sunaram wrote:
hi,
i am trying to build a linux system with lfs6.1 . my
host system is fedora core 4. while i try to make
binituils-2.15.94.2.2 i get the following error
message.
If you want to build LFS on Fedora Core 4 you'll need to follow the development
version of the book. LFS-6.1
Albert wrote:
In file included from ./targ-cpu.h:1,
from ../../binutils-2.15.94.0.2.2/gas/config/obj-elf.h:42,
from ./obj-format.h:1,
from ../../binutils-2.15.94.0.2.2/gas/config/te-linux.h:4,
from ./targ-env.h:1,
Albert wrote:
Ah, thank you, Andrew. I have three distros on my box right now. LFS
5.0 (too old), GoboLinux 012(too weird), and Ubuntu 5.10 (too new). I
am beginning to despair of hitting that just right spot wherein LFS
6.1 will install.
For what it's worth, I had good results building
José Carlos Carrión Plaza wrote:
Hello co-listers:
I have put my hands on a SGI O2 workstation (MIPS R12000 CPU, I believe).
¿Anyone has tried LFS on it?
If not, ¿It's interesting for the LFS project that I try install LFS on
it? (I don't promise any success :-) ).
It's a bit experimental,
Hans - Jürgen Sauer wrote:
Thx for your reply :) - Sure that it is the best way , to find it out - i did
it - it fails the same way :((
Is there any way to redirekt the whole Output into a file ?
It would make it easier to get detailed information , why make install fails .
Sure, if you
Jedediah Klusman wrote:
KK trying to install LFS using live cd. Heres my question, I want my
final LFS distro to have this directory/partition structure
hda1 /
hda2 SWAP
hda3 /var
hda4 ext
hda5 /home
hda6 /usr
However from reading the book it tills me to mount my lfs partition to
/mnt/lfs,
Mark Ryden wrote:
Hello,
I am working on a 2.6.8-2-686 with gcc version 3.4.3.
I am trying to install linuxfromscratch step by step, according
to the book; I am using latest 6.1 stable linuxfromscratch.
I had reached 6.14. GCC-3.4.3.
and there , when running make from gcc-build,I get
Mark Ryden wrote:
Hi,
First thanks Andrew very much indeed for your quick response.
It wasn't that quick. I waited to see if someone else would jump in 'cos I
can't see what's going on...
Should $LFS/usr/include/stdio.h be ***exactly*** similar to the one
on the host system?
There is a
ÕÅ ÓÂ˳ wrote:
i am install the lfs 6.1 in debian 3.1
with kernel 2.6.8.11-i386 gcc 3.4.3
and make this erren
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/mnt/lfs# chroot $LFS /tools/bin/env -i
\
HOME=/root TERM=$TERM PS1='\u:\w\$ ' \
PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/tools/bin \
/tools/bin/bash
Jens Radloff wrote:
I tried the --kernel-source-path option, no success. I made a symlink
from /usr/src/linux to /usr/src/linux-2.6.13.1, and
from /lib/modules/2.6.13.1/build to /usr/src/linux-2.6.13.1, but no
success. I tried several Advanced options which the install script
Jens Radloff wrote:
(3) Some seconds later, this message is displayed: RNTLINK answers:
Files exists [Failed]
Edit /etc/rc.d/init.d/localnet and move the line `ip link set lo up' down one
line so that it's after the line `ip addr add 127.0.0.1/8 label lo dev lo'. The
interface should be
rick wrote:
I have finally managed to get to step 5.5, Installation of
Linux-Libc-Headers without any errors but now am stuck.
The instructions given on pg. 57 in Linux From Scratch ver
6.1 show performing a cp from (what I believe) is my
original partition...
cp -R include/asm-i386
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking of the book (6.1), there's a confusion on page 103:
'console' and 'null' are mounted twice and 'console' with different modes (622
seems to be the correct choice).
No, not mounted. mknod creates block or character special files which allow the
kernel and
Hugo Bernier wrote:
On 9/10/05, Andrew Benton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
I think this needs looking into. Has anyone filed a bug?
[snip]
I just did :-)
What's the number of the bug? a search for tcl in BLFS bugzilla gets me Zarro
Boogs found...
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman
Tushar Teredesai wrote:
I was checking out the various Mozilla projects and found that they
also release NSPR and NSS indepndently of Mozilla. Given that Firefox,
Thunderbird and few other packages link gaim depend on NSS libraries,
it would probably be useful to build these libraries separately
Keith wrote:
Ran into some make check failures with Libtool-1.5.14. All tests passed
right up until the end...
FAIL: f77demo-static.test
SKIP: f77demo-make.test
SKIP: f77demo-exec.test
FAIL: f77demo-conf.test
SKIP: f77demo-make.test
SKIP: f77demo-exec.test
FAIL: f77demo-shared.test
SKIP:
Torsten Vollmann wrote:
Hi.
I just compiled lfs from the latest live-cd. I deactivated loadable module
support in the kernel, but after rebooting realized that the bootscripts need
this option to be enabled because the hotplug script runs scripts from inside
the modules dir...
Just build
Bhishma wrote:
Hi,
This is my first lfs install, and i am experiencing some problems.
I am trying to compile gcc (second pass) and it cannot found the
gnu/stub.h file.
Perhaps you mean gnu/stubs.h? It should have been installed as part of glibc.
It sounds like you had a problem installing
baho-utot wrote:
LFS-6.1 build
I build a kernel (2.6.11.12) for my scratch built system and it populates
/dev with the wrong permissions, ie /dev/null with crw-rw permissions.
Non root users can not access it example: echo Cat shit /dev/null.
Fails with Permission denied. (because of 660
ralph jefferies wrote:
I have a simple newbie question on LFS:
Section 5.3.1 of version 6.1 of the book instructs you
to enter:
mkdir ../binutils-build
cd ../binutils-build
and later
../binutils-2.15.94.0.2.2/configure --prefix=/tools
--disable-nls
I understand that ../ implies the parent
Matt Sanchez wrote:
So, beware of gawk 3.1.4. Use either 3.1.3 or 3.1.5.
libgpg-error LFS 5.1LFS 6.1 LFS 6.1
version gawk 3.1.3 gawk 3.1.4 gawk 3.1.5
-- --- --
0.7 OK did not buildOK
1.0 OK did
Mike Clawson wrote:
I have the following questions. Although I tried to follow the
directions in the book strictly, I wanted the process to be
reasonably automated. The problem I had was with the 'su' command
just before section 4.4 of the book. The logic of the book appears
to be, change to
Guenther Niess wrote:
I've updated my udev-063 to udev-068 and tried it. Then I've rebuild the
kernel and the driver modules. It doesn't help. The sys.log file said:
Aug 23 02:25:19 localhost kernel: ipw2200: Detected Intel PRO/Wireless
2200BG Network Connection
Aug 23 02:25:29 localhost
Tarek Ghaleb wrote:
I take back what I wrote about Fedora. I think Fedora uses a 755
permission as well.
And SuSE, Slack and Mandrake. They all set permissions at 755. Only Debian (and Ubuntu) set the permissions at 644.
Ncurses seems to work OK on Ubuntu so I don't know why we need to set
Tarek Ghaleb wrote:
Hello list,
I'm in the process of building an LFS system a second time, this time
paying more attention to detail. I was wondering why we give the Ncurses
libraries execute permissions in LFS 6.1 (6.21):
chmod 755 /usr/lib/*.5.4
I know in Debian the permissions are 644
Andrew Benton wrote:
Just as an experiment I've (or rather, root has) just run
find /usr/lib -type d -exec chmod 755 {} \;
find /usr/lib -type f -exec chmod 644 {} \;
This has set the permissions of every file in /usr/lib to 644. I've
rebooted and everything seems to be running OK
Guenther Niess wrote:
I have made a system based on the lfs-book. Then I added net-tools,
wireless_tools.
Now I try to install the ipw2200 driver for my wireless card, but it
fail. My current configuration is:
kernel 2.6.12.4
ieee80211 1.0.2
ipw22001.0.6
Before compiling the
DNS, Prasad(GE Consumer Finance, Consultant) wrote:
Hi All,
While doing customized installation, after the completion of installation,
we are getting on error Kernel panic - not syncing...
what may be the reason for this..
help me out in this regard.
Perhaps you didn't enable support
Lyn St George wrote:
Hallo all
Another question, hopefully simple, for vanilla LFS 6.1.
Configuring GCC requires an option to allow it to support
kernel 2.6.x. Does this still allow it support 2.4 kernels?
This installation will not have a kernel of its own, as it will
be a skeleton for
Dienadel wrote:
1- In the init process:
EXT3 FS on hda5, internal journal
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. [OK]
/etc/rc.d/rcsysinit.d/S45autofs: line 110: boot_mesg: command not found
.
Perhaps you're trying to use a new version of BLFS with an old version of the LFS
Jeremy Shivers wrote:
When I try to compile programs that don't already have their configure
script created but have autogen.sh to do the whole aclocal, autoheader,
autoconf, libtoolize and automake thing I sometimes get strange errors.
Running ./autogen.sh that has #!/bin/sh on the first line
Srinath M wrote:
Obviously, the CDROM drive on my Laptop has gone flaky.
Not unnecessarily, it may be that the kernel on the live cd has not been
compiled with support for your particular chipset.
Now I'm looking
for an alternate method to start the installation. The 12 Gig HDD in my
developerman wrote:
Module-init-tools installation chashed becouse 'docbook2html' not found. What
package contains this utility?
docbook-utils http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/pst/docbook-utils.html
You shouldn't need to install things from BLFS to compile LFS. Can you give us
Stephen Liu wrote:
cp: cannot create regular file
`/tools/lib/perl5/5.8.6/warnings.t': Permission denied
Please advise how to fix it.
Follow the book. /tools should be a symbolic link pointing at /mnt/lfs/tools
The user lfs should own the folder /mnt/lfs/tools and so should, by definition,
Stephen Liu wrote:
Shall I manually change;
drwxr-xr-x 13 lfs root 4096 Jul 22 15:36 .
drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 4096 Jul 21 22:23 ..
with
# chmod -R 777 /mnt/lfs/tools
chown -R lfs /mnt/lfs/tools
That may fix the problem, but you shouldn't have installed anything in tools as
root. If
TheOldFellow wrote:
I'm having some problems with grub (and others) on my old i586. It's a
Fujitsu ErgoPro with a Pentium MMX 200Mhz.
Has anyone any ideas?
Well the first thought that sprang to mind was to buy a new hard drive. But
would a new drive work with an old machine? Hard drives
Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
the beta releases of openoffice 2.0 don't have an installer but lots of rpm-files.
Since LinuxFromScratch is not based upon an rpm database, what's the
easiest way to install this release?
I think the easiest way to install it is to install cpio-2.6 (it's in
rblythe wrote:
Thanks in advance for the help.
I am really not sure about this part of the build. I couldn't find a specific
BLFS Mailing list so I hope this is the right place for this post. If not,
could someone please tell me (gently) where blfs support mailing list is.
Speek wrote:
When running in ch 5.10 (Expect) ./configure --prefix=/tools --with-
tcl=/ tools/ lib --with-x=no, an error occurs:
checking for Tcl private headers... checking for tclInt.h... no
configure: error: Can't find Tcl private headers
Building and installing tcl seemed to go fine. I did
rblythe wrote:
I have completed the LFS 6.0 book. System boots like a champ. I have started
putting together things from BLFS. Still working smoothly. Before I go too
much farther, I would like to know:
Can my current LFS be copied to another hard drive for future build
considerations.
rblythe wrote:
I just finished the LFS 6.0 book. Successfully booted into my new LFS system.
I wanted to check if my on-board LAN is working properly. when I issue the
ping command the systems just sits there.
Were you trying to ping a website by name or did you ping the numerical address
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, you might be getting another message very similar to this. Anyways, $LFS is set as /LFS. The /tools directory also exists. The problem that I think I'm having, that I'm not sure I was clear about earlier, is that since chrooting into the new environment, the /LFS
Ozsvath Csaba wrote:
Hi,
I've finished with the lfs book and i booted the new system. Everything went
ok, it gave the login prompt and when i wanted to type, at the first key hit
it gave a kernel panic. I've put this question on the lfs-support irc and
there was an observation (thanx QeH)
Chakkaradeep C C wrote:
performance.??...and how do i generate /etc/modprobe.conf file
initially??
In linux there is help documentation in the form of man pages. To avoid looking stupid, before firing off another message to the list, try reading man modprobe.conf
It says there is a
David Fix wrote:
Hey guys, I've been working through the book (SVN-20050524), and I'm at 6.29.
Flex-2.5.31... (I posted this on the lfs-devel list, but they told me to ask
here)... However, I get the following when I attempt to compile (some parts
compile, then it gets to this):
Allard Welter wrote:
Take it to lfs-chat (and don't top-quote)
Yes, please!
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Phillip Fynan wrote:
I was wondering if anyone knows of a distribution that uses 1 cd and is
known to work for building LFS.
Thanks.
I use Ubuntu. You need to apt-get install gcc, bison and flex so you need a network
connection but it does the job for me
--
John Gay wrote:
My current box is a 6.0TP, but I'm going to be starting to rebuild on a new
box this week, and I hope to have an even better box early in June so I was
wondering will 6.1 be near completion?
In my opinion, LFS-6.1 is good to go
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/testing/
Donal Farrell wrote:
Now I tried going back into chroot and compiling again like we were
shown in LFS chapter 8 (kernel ) {LFS vs 6.0 linux-2.6.8.1} I get the
same kernel panic message. Is there anything I can do in either chroot
or by magic in LFS to correct this or am I destined for a complete
Cliffe Hodgkinson wrote:
As I reported in an earlier post, I have the LFS system pretty much
finished. However, when I go into the chroot environment (making sure
that proc sysfs are mounted and ramfs, tmpfs devpts are fake
mounted first) and try to mount the RAMFS with mount -n -t ramfs
none
Andrew Benton wrote:
the boot scripts try to bring up the loopback interface, it says
RTNETLINK answers: File exists
Well changing the order of those commands made the problem go away. No more ugly red
Fail. With them this way round
ip addr add 127.0.0.1/8 label lo dev lo
ip link set lo up
I now
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I try to set up the symbolic link
ln -s $LHS/tools /
Try using
ln -s $LFS/tools /
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Dan McGhee wrote:
Just completed an LFS 6.0 build--well Friday night. Each time I try to
boot I get:
Kernel panic:VFS:Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block (3,67)
I know that this subject is a FAQ. I have made sure that ext2 and ext3
are compiled into the kernel. In addition, the drivers
Andrei A. Voropaev wrote:
Which means that you've forgotten to set --prefix to configure.
Congratulations, you've just updated the glibc of your host system.
How? The user lfs shouldn't have permissions to write in /usr or / on the host
system
--
Donal Farrell wrote:
hi guys, i having problems with grub for LFS 6.0
when i try to configure grub with root (hd0,6) grub tells me
Error 21: Selected disk does not exist
What kernel are you running when you get this error? The SuSE one or one you compiled
yourself? It may be unrelated but I
Jeremy Utley wrote:
I've always done the dvd symlink like this:
KERNEL=hdc, NAME=hdc, SYMLINK=dvd.
That should definitely do it for you, always has for me.
But, but (just to play devils advocate!) what if someone has a DVD which isn't hdc?
Though I should say, that rule does work for me too.
401 - 456 of 456 matches
Mail list logo
