Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 4/17/06, Richard A Downing FBCS CITP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, I've been experimenting with FUSE (Filesystem in User Space),
which has a driver in the kernel. The entry in fstab has a zero in the
6th field(fs-passno), i.e.:
curlftpfs#langside:[EMAIL PROTECTED
During boot the checkfs bootscript runs the command:
fsck ${options} -a -A -C -T 2/dev/null
and according to my reading of man fsck this means that fsck is to check
each filesystem in /etc/fstab in the order specified by the 6th field.
In my fstab I have a number of filesystem with zero as the
Archaic wrote:
As fellow Hoosiers probably know, our fine government has again decided
to change timezone laws. With a glorious history of changes being made
not just at the state level, but on a county-by-county level, and with
the addition of several changes that were implemented, reverted,
Fabien LUCE wrote:
Bison, Flex and gcc should be enough on Ubuntu
Are you sure??
Can someone confirm?
Thanks a lot
If you need your hand held this much, stick to Ubuntu. You are not
ready for LFS yet.
You could also try it and find out for yourself of course, rather than
implying
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 3/3/06, Richard A Downing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Richard A Downing wrote:
Does anyone know how to set up such a system for gphoto2 (not
usb-storage)?
Does it just work for root when the usb-storage module is not loaded
and /proc/bus
Niki Kovacs wrote:
Hi,
I'm actually in the middle of the first LFS book, somwhere at the beginning
of
chapter 6. I appreciate the quality of the doc: everything is well explained,
and I just have to follow the book.
Just out of curiousity...
1) LFS/BLFS... is it just a learning
On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 16:35:07 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't believe I reposted the whole digest. Apologies to all.
We all do something like that occasionally. Even pan-dimensional
superbeings (like me).
R.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 19:45:20 -0800
Justin O'Neil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Paul Rogers ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
http://www.geocities.com/paulgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: Everything you do communicates.
(I do not personally endorse any additions after this
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 18:34:48 +0100
Clemens Haupt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Clemens,
I realise that you are helping another German speaker. However this
list is English. If you give him bad advice we can't correct it if we
didn't understand it. Please stick to English on the lists and
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:03:24 +0100
Niki Kovacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm an Austrian writer living in Montpezat (South France), and a 100%
GNU/Linux user since 2001.
Excellent, you are the 'Target Audience'. Welcome to LFS.
One question, just on the curious side: how did you
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:24:42 +
Alan Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard A Downing wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:03:24 +0100
Niki Kovacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
snip
It doesn't actually take that long as long as you READ the book
CAREFULLY. (There have been quite a few
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:55:47 +0100
Jeremy Monnet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have searched the web site for an history of the lfs, but I couldn't
find it, can you tell me if there is one ?
My point is I built (b)lfs-6.1, and I would like to start another
build, and I was wondering
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 11:23:14 +0100
Tor Olav Stava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe you should ask yourself what you want from your system.
Good advice.
I've been using SVN version for the last dozen builds, and there's
been no major issues with it. Of course, I don't have any critical
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 16:39:25 -0500
Jeremy Huntwork [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard A Downing wrote:
sudo - nice package, solves the problem of scripting su. It's not
in BLFS (but should be), however it's a straight CMMI package.
Yes it is. :D
Recent addition.
So it is. --with-all
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:44:16 - (GMT)
S. Anthony Sequeira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, December 20, 2005 11:48, Jeremy Byron said:
Dan Nicholson wrote:
Yep, no reason why not. You can script everything if you want. In
fact, I doubt there are any veteran LFSers who don't script
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 20:26:59 +0100
Michiel Faber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Nicholson schreef:
On 12/20/05, Richard A Downing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:44:16 - (GMT)
S. Anthony Sequeira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, December 20, 2005 11:48
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:54:27 -0800
Dan Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/20/05, Michiel Faber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I indeed tried su(do) but i didn't wan't the asking for password
stuff.
I'm no sudo expert, but I think there's is a way to disable the
password prompt.
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:02:21 +0530 (IST)
Chandan M. C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hai All ,
I want to know what will be the actual size of LFS ..After building
completely .. We are getting 270 MB... Can it be reduced still .
Regards
Chandan
Hints.
--
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 12:45:27 +0100
Tony Balinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Karl:
Hi, just to let you all know, I have (almost) seamlessly set up
what I had running in slackware, lfs style; the checklist:-
...
boot in 30 seconds - tick (nearly 2 minutes in slack)
...
One happy
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:51:09 -0500
Andy Kalenderian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in HTML. So he should be ignored. He hasn't read either the FAQ or
the Essential Pre-Reading Hint.
R.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 00:15:36 -0600
Kevin Barnard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK I thought I'd try to run through the LFS install. I'm using a
basic Fedora Code 4 host minimal install with a few extra RPMs so I
can build.
This is a FAQ. FC4 isn't a suitable host distro.
Read FAQ. Search
On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 10:04:50 -0500
Jeremy Huntwork [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Benton wrote:
Bing. You hit the nail on the head there. As Richard said, Fedora Core 4
isn't a suitable distro to build the stable version of the book. It
should work OK for the development version but
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 22:09:27 + (GMT)
Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a number of 486 machines. They have very little memory
16M or less. My interest is to make a version of Linux to
run a few programs on these, particularly the mail program
Mutt and Midnight Commander; no X
Tom wrote:
How do I correctly move the root partition to another partition? Im also
want to move /usr /var as well and probably /home
I've not tried this, but I think it should work.
Boot using something like this grub line:
kernel (hd0,5)/boot/lfskernel-1.2.3 root=/dev/hda4
S. Anthony Sequeira wrote:
A question for the package users users out there. Anyone using
postfix as their MTA?
This thread seems to have dissolved into 'recommend an MTA'. I'd
recommend XMail. It's easy to build, easy to configure, has a built in
pop3 server, integrates well with clamav or
Ian Brown wrote:
Hello LFS List,
Can LFS stabel (6.1) be build with FC4 ?
No. The FC4 Gcc is heavily patched and doesn't work.
Search the archives of LFS-Dev and LFS-Support for possible ways round this.
R.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ:
Lennon Cook wrote:
I'm about to be re-doing LFS (using the GCC4 book, while I built my
current system using the 6.1-pre1 book), and I'm wondering: if /boot
is on a separate partition, do I need to reinstall Grub as part of
LFS, or will my current one still do the job? That is to say: are
Christopher Reimer wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote:
I'm unclear what you mean by 40MB/20GB and 'Ontrack' - that sounds
like a windoze driver ? I imagine it will take several days to build
LFS on a P100, so I wouldn't look forward to it, but it should
certainly be possible.
The laptop I have
Mark wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote:
... Cross-lfs is probably untested for
pentium-class processors ( i686), and had certain issues with glibc
last week which make me reluctant to recommend it for this specific
situation (because restarting from the beginning will be painfully
slow), and the
David Jensen wrote:
David Rosal wrote:
Hi again.
Continuing to reduce the size of my LFS, I've found a quite strange
thing: it seems that e2fsprogs installs identical files with different
names instead of simply symlink them. For example:
I was sent to newbie corner last week! :-)
30 matches
Mail list logo
