Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.1 - 6.17. GCC-4.6.2

2012-05-09 Thread Lázaro Morales
En 08/05/2012 19:34:13, Eleanore Boyd cara...@cox.net escribió: Another hint: If you trust yourself and/or your copy+paste skills, you can save time by skipping all of the testing in the book. However, if you want to know absolutely that it won't break on you, don't skip them. Then again, I

[lfs-support] LFS 7.1 - 6.17. GCC-4.6.2

2012-05-08 Thread Lázaro Morales
Hello, The GCC compilation process finished fine, but I get the next errors in the testing phase and then the test is stopped. === libgomp Summary === [...] make[2]: Target `check-target' not remade because of errors. make[2]: Leaving directory

Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.1 - 6.17. GCC-4.6.2

2012-05-08 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Lázaro Morales wrote: Hello, The GCC compilation process finished fine, but I get the next errors in the testing phase and then the test is stopped. === libgomp Summary === [...] make[2]: Target `check-target' not remade because of errors.

Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.1 - 6.17. GCC-4.6.2

2012-05-08 Thread Lázaro Morales
En 08/05/2012 12:29:41, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com escribió: No. You are OK. If you had hundreds of errors, then that would be a problem, but notice that the book points out libmudflap as a common problem. Thanks Bruce! I will continue then. Best Regards, Lázaro --

Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.1 - 6.17. GCC-4.6.2

2012-05-08 Thread Eleanore Boyd
On 5/8/2012 11:41 AM, Lázaro Morales wrote: En 08/05/2012 12:29:41, Bruce Dubbsbruce.du...@gmail.com escribió: No. You are OK. If you had hundreds of errors, then that would be a problem, but notice that the book points out libmudflap as a common problem. Thanks Bruce! I will continue