Hi all,
probably you know that my GRUB problem was RESOLVED. Your suggestions
were very important.
I hope I'm not becoming tedious, but, while running along BLFS avenue,
I encountered a big problem: I don't succeed in installing GPM-1.20.1.
I followed LFS-Book-6.8 and now BLFS-Book-6.3. I always
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 2:51 AM, Giorgio Cittadini gioci...@gmail.com wrote:
I hope I'm not becoming tedious, but, while running along BLFS avenue,
I encountered a big problem: I don't succeed in installing GPM-1.20.1.
I followed LFS-Book-6.8 and now BLFS-Book-6.3. I always get the errors
here
Thanks for your suggestion. I'll try in the next days and I'll keep
you informed about the hoped success.
Giorgio Cittadini
2011/8/18 William Immendorf will.immend...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 2:51 AM, Giorgio Cittadini gioci...@gmail.com wrote:
I hope I'm not becoming tedious, but,
RESOLVED!!! The suggestion to use BLFS SVN as a progressive complement
to LFS-6.8 has been successfull, at least as regards GPM 1.20.6, that
could be installed without any patch (and actually works well). Thanks
again.
Giorgio Cittadini
2011/8/18 Giorgio Cittadini gioci...@gmail.com:
Thanks
To the attention of Andy and Mac (with many thanks for having
considered my problem).
This is how the things go.
I installed LFS-6.8 on a notebook HP Pavilion dv6215ea with i386 dual
core CPU. My situation at the moment is the following:
(1) 500 GB HD partitioned so to have Windows 7 (reserved)
RESOLVED!!!
The error was that I wrote the new menuentries in grub.cfg under the
voice ###BEGIN /usr/etc/grub.d/40_custom, while it was necessary to
write them under the voice ###BEGIN /usr/etc/grub.d/10_linux.
This recognized it was very easy to get a multiboot LFS | ArchLinux |
Ubuntu-Plus-7 |
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 08:31 +0200, Giorgio Cittadini wrote:
Could there be a bug in the tarball of grub? I don't think it
possible, since the other OSs do use grub2 successfully (one in the
1.98, the other in the 1.99 version).
Not likely, since it's the same tarball that works fine for every
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 08:31:06 +0200
Giorgio Cittadini gioci...@gmail.com wrote:
(5) But also if I manually modify grub.cfg introducing the new
menuentry (and, obviously, I don't use grub-mkconfig), nothing
changes.
Then you are not modifying the grub.cfg that grub (the one on the MBR)
is
Giorgio Cittadini wrote:
RESOLVED!!!
Congratulations!
And thanks for posting the fix.
Mac
--
p=p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);};main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN.
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 17:52:44 +0200
Giorgio Cittadini gioci...@gmail.com wrote:
All is OK, but when I've booted the first time using Grub, I found only
Linux 2.6.37-lfs-6.8 and its recovery mode. I tried to make
recognizable the presence of Windows 7, but I got no success.
When I control the
Andrew Benton wrote:
Giorgio gioci...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
What to do? Could you suggest where I mistook? What to do now: remove
(but how?) Grub and reinstall it?
GRUB is not something to remove. If one no longer wants GRUB, then
one simply overwrites it with something else.
You don't
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:46:46 -0500
Mike McCarty mike.mcca...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Andrew Benton wrote:
You don't need to reinstall grub. If it's working Ok and you can boot
into LFS then just edit grub.cfg to make an entry for windows,
something like this:
menuentry Windows {
set
Andrew Benton wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:46:46 -0500
Mike McCarty mike.mcca...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Andrew Benton wrote:
You don't need to reinstall grub. If it's working Ok and you can boot
into LFS then just edit grub.cfg to make an entry for windows,
something like this:
menuentry
13 matches
Mail list logo
