On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:18:30 -0500
rhubarb...@poetworld.net wrote:
Is there a disadvantage of using auto for file system type in the
/etc/fstab file? I have three non-swap partitions. Why not list
them all as auto?
About the only reason you wouldn't have something set to be auto is if
it
Jonathan Arnold wrote:
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:18:30 -0500
rhubarb...@poetworld.net wrote:
Is there a disadvantage of using auto for file system type in the
/etc/fstab file? I have three non-swap partitions. Why not list
them all as auto?
About the only reason you wouldn't have
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 16:18 -0500, rhubarb...@poetworld.net wrote:
Is there a disadvantage of using auto for file system type in the
/etc/fstab file? I have three non-swap partitions. Why not list them
all as auto?
I may be wrong, but I *think* auto works only for filesystems that are
Is there a disadvantage of using auto for file system type in the
/etc/fstab file? I have three non-swap partitions. Why not list them
all as auto?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:18 PM, rhubarb...@poetworld.net wrote:
Is there a disadvantage of using auto for file system type in the
/etc/fstab file? I have three non-swap partitions. Why not list them
all as auto?
I don't really know the answer to your question but if it's of
interest then
On 09/30/2010 07:52 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:18 PM,rhubarb...@poetworld.net wrote:
Is there a disadvantage of using auto for file system type in the
/etc/fstab file? I have three non-swap partitions. Why not list them
all as auto?
That's a good question... But
