umar wrote:
Hi,friends
This is umar from cdac.iam not getting
how to bundle the packages and make it to bootable CD
can any body help me out
Regards:
MOHD.UMAR
Project Engineer
CDAC
Sorry, can't really help without more information. Is there anything
specific you are having
Help, I'm trying to prepre the Glibc for compliation:
I have unzipped the tar file and moved to addicated
directory as stated in the book specfically
$LFS/tmp/glibc-build. So when I run the command
../glibc-2.3.4/configure --prefix=/tools \
--disable-profile --enable-add-ons \
--enable
) .It
executed correctly.
Can anyone help me to install ptys in my chrooted environment.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Hello all!
This is my first build lfs by refer to LFS BOOK 6.0.
I use FC4 as host system.
I rename /usr/bin/gcc to gcc4 and rename /usr/bin/gcc32 to gcc.Because I think
use gcc-3.2 should be better,may be it can reduce problems.
Now I exec the command:
Problems with gcc4.
that's bad, try using another host-system
On 8/3/05, 杨炳麟 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all!
This is my first build lfs by refer to LFS BOOK 6.0.
I use FC4 as host system.
I rename /usr/bin/gcc to gcc4 and rename /usr/bin/gcc32 to gcc.Because I
think use gcc-3.2 should
杨炳麟 wrote:
Hello all!
This is my first build lfs by refer to LFS BOOK 6.0.
I use FC4 as host system.
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html#what-dist
FC4 and other gcc-4.x host systems are currently not supported and will
cause problems with the current build. Please try using a
: *** [check] Error 2
But that I know of- thats just about it
...um, help anyone?
***
Then I got a reply on a forum:
What you did shouldn't mess it up (pressing ctrl-c after missing a `) since
bash was waiting for the matching ` before it executed the command. What
does ls /lib/libc.* show
is with new ld ( /tools/bin/ld
), because when i use old ld:
lfs:/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build$ /usr/bin/ld
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/3.2.3/../../../libc.so
it works.
Please help me.
P.S.
Excuse me for my terrible english.
--
Best Regards
Bolt
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org
), because when i use old ld:
lfs:/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build$ /usr/bin/ld
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/3.2.3/../../../libc.so
it works.
Please help me.
P.S.
Excuse me for my terrible english.
--
Best Regards
Bolt
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http
rblythe wrote:
Thanks in advance for the help.
I am really not sure about this part of the build. I couldn't find a specific
BLFS Mailing list so I hope this is the right place for this post. If not,
could someone please tell me (gently) where blfs support mailing list is.
blfs-support
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
The same problem exists for other hardware, e.g. Intel EtherExpress
100 and Tulip network cards, but I don't know the situation well for
those chipsets (both e100 and eepro100 work here).
For PCI hardware, I already listed all problematic cases that are
relevant
Bobby Pejman wrote:
In script1.sh I have:
su lfs -c ~/script2.sh
su root -c ~/script3.sh
one way to do this is
to cat the chapter 4.4 .bash_profile and .bashrc's to /home/lfs as root
then chown and chmod them to lfs.lfs and 644
add to end of /home/lfs/.bashrc:
exec
David Jensen wrote:
It appears it will work.
no, it doesn't.
env is ok, but 'set +o' shows the cache is on.
set +h; set +o, still on :(
still thinking!
---
David Jensen
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
David Jensen wrote:
set +h; set +o, still on :(
no, that works.
#script2.sh
set +h; set +o
env
exit
#end script2.sh
you (may) need 'set +h' at the top of (all) your scripts.
---
David Jensen
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ:
David Jensen wrote:
set +h; set +o, still on :(
no, that works.
#script2.sh
set +h; set +o
env
exit
#end script2.sh
you (may) need 'set +h' at the top of (all) your scripts.
---
David Jensen
Hi,
Can we (everyone) get the final script, if it is successful. It will be
and toolchain worked. So I know it's the
lfs
user thing.
What steps do I need to add or change in order to
install LFS without using LFS as a user?
Thank you all for all your help. I really
appreciate
it!!!
Bobby
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have you looked into using sudo instead
Bobby Pejman wrote:
Hello All,
In section 4.3 (Add the LFS user) of the book, I don't
want to add a user LFS. I'm automating my installation
using a simple bash script and when it does this:
su - lfs
My automation stops. :( I like to be able to continue
my installation in root. I am not
to do? Thank you ALL for
your help suggestions.
Bobby
--- Steve Crosby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 28 May 2005, you wrote in lfs.support:
Hello All,
In section 4.3 (Add the LFS user) of the book, I
don't
want to add a user LFS. I'm automating my
installation
using a simple bash
I have:
mkdir script3
exit
Is this what you mean for me to do? Thank you ALL for
your help suggestions.
Bobby
trouble in what sense? are the directories not created?
hint - put a set -vx at the top of each script, which will display the
commands as they run.
- --
Steve Crosby
--
http
hi,
what does the ../gcc-3.4.1/contrib/testsummary file..i may be wrong in
the filename , LFS book has given to check with the summary of the
resultspls do check that file...
with regards,
C.C.Chakkaradeep
On 5/18/05, Michell L. Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some person could help me
,
.lzs
--
Lai Zit Seng
http://thinkingfarm.com/~lzs/
Chakkaradeep C C wrote:
hi all,
well,i have completed LFS 6.0,now i want to know the steps in which
the LFS bootscripts works, and how they are written...where can i get
help,is there any docs on LFS Bootscripts??
with regards
GSI wrote:
Hi there,
all packages beyond chapter 6.13 were compiled successfully but building
Binutils always produces the following errors. (Bison is missing ?)
Or what is the Problem.
I´ve read the Book. Good Book ??? 8-)
Cheops wrote:
I have gotten the exact same error, only difference is that it happend
in chapter 5.4. Binutils-2.15.94.0.2.2 - Pass 1
I am using the following liveCD as a host : lfslivecd-x86-6.0-1.iso
Currently I am using book LFS-BOOK-6.1-testing-20050401-HTML.
So using all versions as given in
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Cheops wrote:
I have gotten the exact same error, only difference is that it happend
in chapter 5.4. Binutils-2.15.94.0.2.2 - Pass 1
I am using the following liveCD as a host : lfslivecd-x86-6.0-1.iso
Currently I am using book LFS-BOOK-6.1-testing-20050401-HTML.
So using
Hi there,
all packages beyond chapter 6.13 were compiled successfully but building
Binutils always produces the following errors. (Bison is missing ?)
Or what is the Problem.
I´ve read the Book. Good Book ??? 8-)
/sources/binutils-build/binutils/../../binutils-2.15.91.0.2/binutils/arlex.l:54:
GSI wrote:
I think gcc cannot find the installed Bison from Chapter 5, but i
don´t understand why.
You know, it might be as simple as having missed the 'make install'
command from chapter 5, and thinking you've done it. I know I've done
stuff like that before. If that's the case, just go
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
GSI wrote:
I think gcc cannot find the installed Bison from Chapter 5, but i
don´t understand why.
You know, it might be as simple as having missed the 'make install'
command from chapter 5, and thinking you've done it. I know I've done
stuff like that before. If
On Saturday 09 April 2005 15:41, Earth Engine wrote:
Section 5.6 (Linux-Libc-Header-2.6.8.1)
Install the header files:
cp -R include/asm-i386 /tools/include/asm
cp -R include/linux /tools/include
If your architecture is not i386 (compatible),
Section 5.6 (Linux-Libc-Header-2.6.8.1)
Install the header files:
cp -R include/asm-i386 /tools/include/asm
cp -R include/linux /tools/include
If your architecture is not i386 (compatible),
adjust the first command accordingly.
401 - 429 of 429 matches
Mail list logo
