[lfs-support] udev-lfs-20140305.tar.bz2 not found.

2014-04-06 Thread xinglp
http://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/sources/other/udev-lfs-20140305.tar.bz2
att
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


[lfs-support] Thanks

2014-04-06 Thread Robin
Thanks to all for the book and the help on the lists.  Apart from
minor console and network config issues, down to my errors, everything
works fine.

Thanks
-- 
rob
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: [lfs-support] udev-lfs-20140305.tar.bz2 not found.

2014-04-06 Thread Bruce Dubbs
xinglp wrote:
 http://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/sources/other/udev-lfs-20140305.tar.bz2

Yes, it should be 20140306.  I fixed that last night.  The on-line 
version of the book is correct as well as the svn source.

   -- Bruce
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


[lfs-support] LFS-7.5 Chapter 6.61. Util-linux-2.24.1

2014-04-06 Thread baho utot
the  configure should be:

./configure --disable-nologin

as nologin was previously installed by shadow


-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: [lfs-support] LFS-7.5 Chapter 6.61. Util-linux-2.24.1

2014-04-06 Thread William Harrington

On Apr 6, 2014, at 7:20 PM, baho utot wrote:

 the  configure should be:

 ./configure --disable-nologin

 as nologin was previously installed by shadow


Does util-linux nologin binary overwrite shadow's? If so, that is  
desired because util-linux ships a better nologin binary.

Coreutils will also overwrite groups program because it is better than  
shadow's groups binary.


Rather, shadow, if not wanting to install groups or nologin installed,  
could edit Makefile.in to exclude those.

Sincerely,

WIlliam Harrington
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: [lfs-support] LFS-7.5 Chapter 6.61. Util-linux-2.24.1

2014-04-06 Thread baho utot

On 04/06/2014 08:33 PM, William Harrington wrote:
 On Apr 6, 2014, at 7:20 PM, baho utot wrote:

 the  configure should be:

 ./configure --disable-nologin

 as nologin was previously installed by shadow

 Does util-linux nologin binary overwrite shadow's? If so, that is
 desired because util-linux ships a better nologin binary.

I am using rpm package manager.  It causes a conflict when a file is 
already installed by another package.
You then have to remove one of them from one of the packages.


 Coreutils will also overwrite groups program because it is better than
 shadow's groups binary.

There isn't a groups executeable installed by shadow.
I could list the files installed by shadow and coreutils here if needed




 Rather, shadow, if not wanting to install groups or nologin installed,
 could edit Makefile.in to exclude those.

On my builds I just rm the duplicate file from one of the packages 
before it is packaged up by rpm so I don't have to edit any of the 
Makefiles.

For the book the later package will over write the earlier package, and 
you will not know the over write has occurred.


 Sincerely,

 WIlliam Harrington

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: [lfs-support] LFS-7.5 Chapter 6.61. Util-linux-2.24.1

2014-04-06 Thread Bruce Dubbs
baho utot wrote:

 On 04/06/2014 08:33 PM, William Harrington wrote:
 On Apr 6, 2014, at 7:20 PM, baho utot wrote:

 the  configure should be:

 ./configure --disable-nologin

 as nologin was previously installed by shadow

 Does util-linux nologin binary overwrite shadow's? If so, that is
 desired because util-linux ships a better nologin binary.

 I am using rpm package manager.  It causes a conflict when a file is
 already installed by another package.
 You then have to remove one of them from one of the packages.


 Coreutils will also overwrite groups program because it is better than
 shadow's groups binary.

 There isn't a groups executeable installed by shadow.

Yes, we do disable that.

 Rather, shadow, if not wanting to install groups or nologin installed,
 could edit Makefile.in to exclude those.

 On my builds I just rm the duplicate file from one of the packages
 before it is packaged up by rpm so I don't have to edit any of the
 Makefiles.

 For the book the later package will over write the earlier package, and
 you will not know the over write has occurred.

That seems like the correct behavior to me.

   -- Bruce

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page