Hai,
I tried to install bash-2.05a as suggested by the
book.
While ./configure ... it was fine. But while 'make' it
gave the following error(at end of the mail).
I am using fedoracore 3, glibc-2.3.3, gcc-3.4.2
I am following LFS-3.3
I am not a subscribed member of this mailing list.
Thank
Hello,
I've a problem during compilation of pass 2 of
the binutils. Up to this point I followed the
instructions of the lfs-book (6.0) page by page
and everything worked fine. But now, the compilation
process stops with following message:
[...]
file=../../../binutils-2.15.91.0.2/bfd/po/`echo fr
R.Grasbon wrote:
rm -f $file PATH=../src:$PATH no -o $file
Looks to me to be a typo here
--
Shane Shields
Registered LFS Compiler: 7582
To drink the WINE of success you must first seek the sayings of source
Anyone sending unwanted advertising e-mail to this address will be charged $25
Shane Shields schrieb:
R.Grasbon wrote:
rm -f $file PATH=../src:$PATH no -o $file
Looks to me to be a typo here
I think not, but I'm not 100% sure because I transfered the
error-message by hand. But the principal problem remains
in force.
Reimar
--
R.Grasbon wrote:
Shane Shields schrieb:
R.Grasbon wrote:
rm -f $file PATH=../src:$PATH no -o $file
Looks to me to be a typo here
I think not, but I'm not 100% sure because I transfered the
error-message by hand. But the principal problem remains
in force.
Reimar
What I
On 7/4/05, Shane Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
R.Grasbon wrote:
rm -f $file PATH=../src:$PATH no -o $file
Looks to me to be a typo here
The configure script for binutils has replaced a missing gettext
command with the value no. Either your host has an incomplete
gettext
Shane Shields schrieb:
R.Grasbon wrote:
What I meant by typo is there is no program by the name of no that
I know of. Which leads me to believe that somewhere in your toolchain
compile you made a typo. Are you cut'n'pasting or typing out by hand?
If cut'n'pasting maybe you selected less
Hello out there,
I searched the internet the last two days to get my Intel Pro/1000 MT
Dual Port Server Adapter running.
I created my LFS with SVN Version 20050630 and had no major problems
with building it.
I now compiled a nice fresh 2.6.12.2 Kernel with hotplug and module
support which runs
On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, R.Grasbon wrote:
Yes. I'm sorry about that and will be given this information tomorrow.
At the moment I can say, that my host system ist a debian sarge with
kernel 2.6.
Knowing debian's tendency to keep using (and patching) old versions of
software, maybe it's version
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words
Hello out there,
I searched the internet the last two days to get my Intel Pro/1000 MT
Dual Port Server Adapter running.
I created my LFS with SVN Version 20050630 and had no major problems
with building it. I now compiled a nice fresh
I have question...
Why, in new version LFS, are We dynamically linking bintuitls and GCC in
Chapter 5, Pass 1??? In LFS 6.0 it was statically linked.
Thanx a lot
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the
Kapier wrote:
I have question...
Why, in new version LFS, are We dynamically linking bintuitls and GCC in
Chapter 5, Pass 1??? In LFS 6.0 it was statically linked.
Thanx a lot
From the Changelog...
April 16, 2005 [matt]: Removed references to statically linking the pass
1 toolchain which
rblythe wrote:
Thanks in advance for the help.
I am really not sure about this part of the build. I couldn't find a specific
BLFS Mailing list so I hope this is the right place for this post. If not,
could someone please tell me (gently) where blfs support mailing list is.
Hi People,
thanks to all again. uprading my pkg-config v0.17 to v0.18 solved the
problem.
ciao
ulf
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, Ahmed El-Daly wrote:
I swear by all things holy that perl is in the PATH. After chrooting,
if I type perl -v from anywhere in the file structure, I get:
This is perl, v5.8.5 built for x86_64-linux
[...]
Still in config.make I have this line:
PERL = no
What does perl
Hello,
I've just finished LFS CVS (2005.06.30), and ecstatically booted into my
new shiny system. Everything seems to be fine so far - apart from the
fact that one I supply my account name (root) and password, I... cannot
press Enter. Same happens if I boot into my home system and then chroot
I'm now encountering strange responses from sed prior to compiling GCC
in Chapter 6. I'm supposed to run
sed -i 's/install_to_$(INSTALL_DEST) //' libiberty/Makefile.in
..but I get the following:
sed: -e expression #1, char 32: unknown option to `s'
In case anyone using user package management
On 7/4/05, Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, Ahmed El-Daly wrote:
I swear by all things holy that perl is in the PATH. After chrooting,
if I type perl -v from anywhere in the file structure, I get:
This is perl, v5.8.5 built for x86_64-linux
[...]
Still in
18 matches
Mail list logo
