Re: LFS grub start error

2011-01-06 Thread Rosario Turco
Bruce Dubbs bruce.dubbs at gmail.com writes:


-- Bruce

I haven't got /dev/sda4, my /dev/sda has got only two (sda1 e sda2)
brw-rw 1 root daemon 8, 0 Jan  2 18:31 /dev/sda
brw-rw 1 root daemon 8, 1 Jan  2 18:31 /dev/sda1
brw-rw 1 root daemon 8, 2 Jan  2 18:31 /dev/sda2
brw-rw 1 root daemon 8, 16 Jan  2 18:31 /dev/sdb
brw-rw 1 root daemon 8, 17 Jan  2 18:31 /dev/sdb1
brw-rw 1 root daemon 8, 18 Jan  2 18:31 /dev/sdb2
brw-rw 1 root daemon 8, 19 Jan  2 18:31 /dev/sdb3
brw-rw 1 root daemon 8, 20 Jan  2 18:31 /dev/sdb4

So i have modified grub.cfg with
set root=(hd0,1)
and
root=/dev/sda2

with boot on /dev/sda1

In fstab i have done the same   
/dev/sda1 /boot ext3 ...
/dev/sda2 /   ext3 

Now i obtain this error:
.. (i cannot read all because is very speed ... How can read all? 
Is there alog?)

list of all partions:
0800 sda
0801 sda1
0802 sda2
0803 sda3
0804 sda4
0b00 sr0 driver
No filesystem could mount root, tried: ext3 vfat msdos iso9660
Kernel panic: not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown block(8,2)

I am blocked.

Then i cannot use 8.4.3 Testing teh configuration with Fedora 14, because
/sbin/reboot  restarts all and doesn't show prompt grub 





-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: tools directory question

2011-01-06 Thread Andrew Benton
On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 14:19:48 -0800
Brian Winfrey bwcod...@gmail.com wrote:

 After completing the pre chroot steps I find I have
 /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu
 and
 /tools/i686-lfs-linux-gnu
 directories (some libs too).
 
 Is this correct, or did I miss something along the way.  I guess they
 have to do with first and second passes of binutils/gcc, but I want to
 be sure before I proceed.

Yes, for a 32 bit build it's normal to have /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu
and /tools/i686-lfs-linux-gnu because we pass the option 
--target=$LFS_TGT to the configure scripts of binutils and gcc the
first time around but not the second time.

Andy
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: LFS grub start error

2011-01-06 Thread Andrew Benton
On Thu, 6 Jan 2011 10:56:23 + (UTC)
Rosario Turco rosario_tu...@virgilio.it wrote:

 Bruce Dubbs bruce.dubbs at gmail.com writes:
 
 
 -- Bruce
 
 I haven't got /dev/sda4, my /dev/sda has got only two (sda1 e sda2)
 brw-rw 1 root daemon 8, 0 Jan  2 18:31 /dev/sda
 brw-rw 1 root daemon 8, 1 Jan  2 18:31 /dev/sda1
 brw-rw 1 root daemon 8, 2 Jan  2 18:31 /dev/sda2
 brw-rw 1 root daemon 8, 16 Jan  2 18:31 /dev/sdb
 brw-rw 1 root daemon 8, 17 Jan  2 18:31 /dev/sdb1
 brw-rw 1 root daemon 8, 18 Jan  2 18:31 /dev/sdb2
 brw-rw 1 root daemon 8, 19 Jan  2 18:31 /dev/sdb3
 brw-rw 1 root daemon 8, 20 Jan  2 18:31 /dev/sdb4
 
 So i have modified grub.cfg with
 set root=(hd0,1)
 and
 root=/dev/sda2
 
 with boot on /dev/sda1
 
 In fstab i have done the same   
 /dev/sda1 /boot ext3 ...
 /dev/sda2 /   ext3 
 
 Now i obtain this error:
 .. (i cannot read all because is very speed ... How can read all? 
 Is there alog?)
 
 list of all partions:
 0800 sda
 0801 sda1
 0802 sda2
 0803 sda3
 0804 sda4

The kernel sees 4 partitions on /dev/sda. 

 0b00 sr0 driver
 No filesystem could mount root, tried: ext3 vfat msdos iso9660
 Kernel panic: not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown block(8,2)

Clearly, what your host Fedora system sees as /dev/sdb your LFS kernel
sees as /dev/sda. Try altering your grub.cfg to pass your LFS kernel
the option root=/dev/sdb2

linux /boot/vmlinux-lfs root=/dev/sdb2

Andy
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: jhalfs not work with xz-utils

2011-01-06 Thread xinglp
It looks like the jhalfs use the below section instead of filename.

lfs/{chapter05,chapter06}/xz.xml line 9
?dbhtml filename=xz-utils.html?

2011/1/6 Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com:
 xinglp wrote:
 I patched the jhalfs. Maybe I should patch the lfs book instead.

 BTW: Is there any tools for editing the lfs book in a easier way,
 other than vim.

 No, that's how we've always done it.


 diff -Naur jhalfs.orig/LFS/master.sh jhalfs/LFS/master.sh
 --- jhalfs.orig/LFS/master.sh
 +++ jhalfs/LFS/master.sh
 @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@

      # Grab the name of the target (minus the -pass1 or -pass2 in the
 case of gcc
      # and binutils in chapter 5)
 -    name=`echo ${this_script} | sed -e 's...@[0-9]\{3\}-@@' -e
 's...@-pass[0-9]\{1\}@@'`
 +    name=`echo ${this_script} | sed -e 's...@[0-9]\{3\}-@@' -e
 's...@-pass[0-9]\{1\}@@' -e 's...@-utils@@'`

      # Set the dependency for the first target.
      if [ -z $PREV ] ; then PREV=022-settingenvironment ; fi
 @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@
      esac

      # Grab the name of the target.
 -    name=`echo ${this_script} | sed -e 's...@[0-9]\{3\}-@@' -e 's,'$N',,'`
 +    name=`echo ${this_script} | sed -e 's...@[0-9]\{3\}-@@' -e
 's,'$N',,' -e 's...@-utils@@'`

      # Find the version of the command files, if it corresponds with
 the building of
      # a specific package. We need this here to can skip scripts not needed 
 for

 It appears that 'this_script' is taken from the xml filename.  I can
 easily change that.  The problem is that the home page calls it 'XZ
 Utils', but the package is named xz-version.

 I went ahead and made the change in rev 9438.  It shouldn't make any
 changes to rendered book.

   -- Bruce
 --
 http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
 FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
 Unsubscribe: See the above information page

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: tools directory question

2011-01-06 Thread Brian Winfrey
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Andrew Benton b3n...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 14:19:48 -0800
 Brian Winfrey bwcod...@gmail.com wrote:

 After completing the pre chroot steps I find I have
 /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu
 and
 /tools/i686-lfs-linux-gnu
 directories (some libs too).

 Is this correct, or did I miss something along the way.  I guess they
 have to do with first and second passes of binutils/gcc, but I want to
 be sure before I proceed.

 Yes, for a 32 bit build it's normal to have /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu
 and /tools/i686-lfs-linux-gnu because we pass the option
 --target=$LFS_TGT to the configure scripts of binutils and gcc the
 first time around but not the second time.

 Andy
 --
 http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
 FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
 Unsubscribe: See the above information page


I thought that was the case.
Thanks, I can continue now.
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: Error in 6.7. Linux-2.6.35.4 API Headers

2011-01-06 Thread Andrew Burns
Muruganand Karthikeyan muruthegun at gmail.com writes:

 
 Hi All,
 
 I'm facing an error in 6.7 linux API headers specifically the step
 
...snip...
 There are a whole lot of previous posts with the exact same error. But
 a resolution was not posted. I've checked my GCC/Binutils compile logs
 and they seem to be alright. The sanity tests passed as well. So I've
 kind of hit a dead end here. Any help is much appreciated.
 
 Thanks,
 Anand


I am experiencing the exact same issue. A directory listing indicates that all 
the files exist; however attempting to execute them results in the No such file 
or directory, which leads me to believe it is missing a dependency.

A ldd file results in the same error.

Guidance anyone?



-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: LFS grub start error

2011-01-06 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Rosario Turco wrote:

 I haven't got /dev/sda4, my /dev/sda has got only two (sda1 e sda2)
 brw-rw 1 root daemon 8, 0 Jan  2 18:31 /dev/sda
 brw-rw 1 root daemon 8, 1 Jan  2 18:31 /dev/sda1
 brw-rw 1 root daemon 8, 2 Jan  2 18:31 /dev/sda2
 brw-rw 1 root daemon 8, 16 Jan  2 18:31 /dev/sdb
 brw-rw 1 root daemon 8, 17 Jan  2 18:31 /dev/sdb1
 brw-rw 1 root daemon 8, 18 Jan  2 18:31 /dev/sdb2
 brw-rw 1 root daemon 8, 19 Jan  2 18:31 /dev/sdb3
 brw-rw 1 root daemon 8, 20 Jan  2 18:31 /dev/sdb4
 
 So i have modified grub.cfg with
 set root=(hd0,1)
 and
 root=/dev/sda2
 
 with boot on /dev/sda1
 
 In fstab i have done the same   
 /dev/sda1 /boot ext3 ...
 /dev/sda2 /   ext3 
 
 Now i obtain this error:
 .. (i cannot read all because is very speed ... How can read all? 
 Is there alog?)
 
 list of all partions:
 0800 sda
 0801 sda1
 0802 sda2
 0803 sda3
 0804 sda4
 0b00 sr0 driver
 No filesystem could mount root, tried: ext3 vfat msdos iso9660
 Kernel panic: not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown block(8,2)
 
 I am blocked.
 
 Then i cannot use 8.4.3 Testing teh configuration with Fedora 14, because
 /sbin/reboot  restarts all and doesn't show prompt grub 

Do you get a menu before it starts to build?  If so type 'c' when it 
comes up and enter commands there.

I'd also recommend cutting down the grub.cfg file to the minimum and 
posting it here,  You really only need something like this to start:

insmod ext2
set root=(hd0,1)

menuentry Linux 2.6.36.2-lfs {
 linux /linux-2.6.36.2-lfs root=/dev/sda1 ro

But it really sounds like you are booting, but there is a problem with 
the parameters.  Note that the 'set root=(hd0,1)' is for grub and 
'root=/dev/sda1' is for the linux kernel.

   -- Bruce

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: LFS grub start error

2011-01-06 Thread Rosario Turco
Bruce Dubbs bruce.dubbs at gmail.com writes:

 
 Rosario Turco wrote:
 
  I haven't got /dev/sda4, my /dev/sda has got only two (sda1 e sda2)
  brw-rw 1 root daemon 8, 0 Jan  2 18:31 /dev/sda
  brw-rw 1 root daemon 8, 1 Jan  2 18:31 /dev/sda1
  brw-rw 1 root daemon 8, 2 Jan  2 18:31 /dev/sda2
  brw-rw 1 root daemon 8, 16 Jan  2 18:31 /dev/sdb
  brw-rw 1 root daemon 8, 17 Jan  2 18:31 /dev/sdb1
  brw-rw 1 root daemon 8, 18 Jan  2 18:31 /dev/sdb2
  brw-rw 1 root daemon 8, 19 Jan  2 18:31 /dev/sdb3
  brw-rw 1 root daemon 8, 20 Jan  2 18:31 /dev/sdb4
  
  So i have modified grub.cfg with
  set root=(hd0,1)
  and
  root=/dev/sda2
  
  with boot on /dev/sda1
  
  In fstab i have done the same   
  /dev/sda1 /boot ext3 ...
  /dev/sda2 /   ext3 
  
  Now i obtain this error:
  .. (i cannot read all because is very speed ... How can read all? 
  Is there alog?)
  
  list of all partions:
  0800 sda
  0801 sda1
  0802 sda2
  0803 sda3
  0804 sda4
  0b00 sr0 driver
  No filesystem could mount root, tried: ext3 vfat msdos iso9660
  Kernel panic: not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown 
  block(8,2)
  
  I am blocked.
  
  Then i cannot use 8.4.3 Testing teh configuration with Fedora 14, because
  /sbin/reboot  restarts all and doesn't show prompt grub 
 
 Do you get a menu before it starts to build?  If so type 'c' when it 
 comes up and enter commands there.
 
 I'd also recommend cutting down the grub.cfg file to the minimum and 
 posting it here,  You really only need something like this to start:
 
 insmod ext2
 set root=(hd0,1)
 
 menuentry Linux 2.6.36.2-lfs {
  linux /linux-2.6.36.2-lfs root=/dev/sda1 ro
 
 But it really sounds like you are booting, but there is a problem with 
 the parameters.  Note that the 'set root=(hd0,1)' is for grub and 
 'root=/dev/sda1' is for the linux kernel.
 
-- Bruce
 

 
I have reduced grub.cfg at minimum as your suggest.

Now the error is:

xxx] md: ... autorun DONE.
VFS: Cannot open root device sda1 or un-known block(8,1)
Please append a correct root= boot options. Here are the available partitions:

0800 n sda driver: sd
0802 sda2
0803 sda3
0804 sda4
0b00  sr0 driver: sr
No filesystem could mount root, tried: ext3 vfat msdos iso9660
Kernel panic: not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown block(8,1)

GRUB.CFG
### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/00_header ###
if [ -s $prefix/grubenv ]; then
  load_env
fi
set default=0
if [ ${prev_saved_entry} ]; then
  set saved_entry=${prev_saved_entry}
  save_env saved_entry
  set prev_saved_entry=
  save_env prev_saved_entry
  set boot_once=true
fi

function savedefault {
  if [ -z ${boot_once} ]; then
saved_entry=${chosen}
save_env saved_entry
  fi
}
insmod ext2
set root='(hd1,1)'
set timeout=5
### END /etc/grub.d/00_header ###

### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/10_linux ###
menuentry GNU/Linux, with Linux 2.6.36-lfs-6.7 --class gnu-linux --class gnu
--class os {
insmod ext2
set root='(hd1,1)'
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set c544afb8-6417-4d14-89e0-5aa35173c3c3
echoLoading Linux 2.6.36-lfs-6.7 ...
linux   /boot/vmlinux-2.6.36-lfs-6.7 root=/dev/sda1 ro  
}
### END /etc/grub.d/10_linux ###


FSTAB
/dev/sdb1 / ext3 defaults 1 1
/dev/sdb2 /home ext3 defaults 1 1
/dev/sdb3 swap swap pri=1 0 0 
proc /proc proc defaults 0 0
sysfs /sys sysfs defaults 0 0
devpts /dev/pts devpts gid=4,mode=620 0 0
tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0

My /dev now is:
/dev/sda
/dev/sda1
/dev/sda2
/dev/sdb
/dev/sdb1
/dev/sdb2
/dev/sdb3   
 
Is it possible to see a log of the complete error? For example the output of
dmesg ...






-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: Error in 6.7. Linux-2.6.35.4 API Headers

2011-01-06 Thread Ken Moffat
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 04:25:06PM +, Andrew Burns wrote:
 Muruganand Karthikeyan muruthegun at gmail.com writes:
 
  
  Hi All,
  
  I'm facing an error in 6.7 linux API headers specifically the step
  
 ...snip...
  There are a whole lot of previous posts with the exact same error. But
  a resolution was not posted. I've checked my GCC/Binutils compile logs
  and they seem to be alright. The sanity tests passed as well. So I've
  kind of hit a dead end here. Any help is much appreciated.
  
  Thanks,
  Anand
 
 
 I am experiencing the exact same issue. A directory listing indicates that 
 all 
 the files exist; however attempting to execute them results in the No such 
 file 
 or directory, which leads me to believe it is missing a dependency.
 
 A ldd file results in the same error.
 
 Guidance anyone?
 
 If a binary program file created in chapter 5 exists, but you
cannot execute it after you have entered chroot, then it must be
linked to the host's files.

 If ldd is linked to the host's files, you have a major problem -
either you didn't run 'adjusting the toolchain', or it didn't work.

ĸen
-- 
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: LFS grub start error

2011-01-06 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Rosario Turco wrote:

 Is it possible to see a log of the complete error? For example the output of
 dmesg ...

Until you get it to boot, no.  If it can't mount /, where would it write 
to?

I don't think you understand.  Make a grub.cfg file that is exactly 5 
lines long:

insmod ext2
set root='(hd0,1)'
menuentry LFS {
   linux   /boot/vmlinux-2.6.36-lfs-6.7 root=/dev/sda1 ro
}

What partition did you use for LFS?  /dev/sdb1?  Try all variations of
root=/dev/sd??.

fstab at this point doesn't matter.

   -- Bruce
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: Udev-165 (apparently) System Crash

2011-01-06 Thread alupu

On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 02:08:45 AM, Simon Geard wrote ... if the system is completely frozen, it may be hardware related ...Hi Simon,Very good points, overall.When it crashes it's frozen all right (i.e. a crash crash).No hardware changes as of late.Seems some old hardware the latest Udev iteration started disagreeing with.I have a software-"mirror" system, more modern, SATA based, which still boots verysmoothly.If I correctly read the frozen screen, and taking into account the Udev stepwhere the crash occurs, seems an IRQ conflict of some sort.I'll dig into it.The important thing for me is you appear to support me, even if indirectly,in my attempt to avoid kdump in my troubleshoot, if at all possible :)Thank you very much,Best Wishes,-- Alex
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: jhalfs not work with xz-utils

2011-01-06 Thread Thomas Pegg

On Jan 6, 2011, at 11:18 AM, xinglp wrote:

 It looks like the jhalfs use the below section instead of filename.
 
 lfs/{chapter05,chapter06}/xz.xml line 9
 ?dbhtml filename=xz-utils.html?
 

Yes, right it does ignore my previous email. 
Bruce if you would like I'll fix this in jhalfs, rather than making more 
changes to the book.

Thomas


-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: jhalfs not work with xz-utils

2011-01-06 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Thomas Pegg wrote:
 On Jan 6, 2011, at 11:18 AM, xinglp wrote:
 
 It looks like the jhalfs use the below section instead of filename.
 
 
 lfs/{chapter05,chapter06}/xz.xml line 9 ?dbhtml
 filename=xz-utils.html?
 
 
 Yes, right it does ignore my previous email. Bruce if you would like
 I'll fix this in jhalfs, rather than making more changes to the book.

Yes, that would be great Thomas.  Thanks.

   -- Bruce
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: Udev-165 (apparently) System Crash

2011-01-06 Thread William Immendorf
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:36 PM,  al...@verizon.net wrote:
 If I correctly read the frozen screen, and taking into account the Udev step
 where the crash occurs, seems an IRQ conflict of some sort.
 I'll dig into it.
Intriguing. This is something that you should report to both LKML and
linux-hotplug (the Udev list). Also, be sure to provide the kdump of
that kernel, the log, and the hardware that you think is causing the
Udev issue.


-- 
William Immendorf
The ultimate in free computing.
Messages in plain text, please, no HTML.
GPG key ID: 1697BE98
If it's not signed, it's not from me.

--

Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master.  Richard Stallman
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: Error in 6.7. Linux-2.6.35.4 API Headers

2011-01-06 Thread Muruganand Karthikeyan
 I'm facing an error in 6.7 linux API headers specifically the step
 ...snip...
 Thanks,
 Anand

 I am experiencing the exact same issue. A directory listing indicates that all
 the files exist; however attempting to execute them results in the No such 
 file
 or directory, which leads me to believe it is missing a dependency.

 A ldd file results in the same error.

 Guidance anyone?

Make sure you delete all the source directories that you untar, before
adjusting the tool chain.  Have you run the script for checking the
host system requirements? I noticed that on my ubuntu host /bin/sh was
linked to dash. I changed this  to point to bash.
Also I used the following cflags: -march=native, -pipe, -O2,
-fomit-frame-pointer. Not sure if they have any bearing on the
outcome, but, since its a change that I made since my last
unsuccessful attempt at LFS , i thought i might add it here anyways.

Anand
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: Udev-165 (apparently) System Crash

2011-01-06 Thread Simon Geard
On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 18:36 -0600, al...@verizon.net wrote:
 The important thing for me is you appear to support me, even if
 indirectly, in my attempt to avoid kdump in my troubleshoot, if at all
 possible :)

Happy to help.

Simon.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: Error in 6.7. Linux-2.6.35.4 API Headers

2011-01-06 Thread David Young
2010/12/24 Muruganand Karthikeyan muruthe...@gmail.com

 Hi All,

 I'm facing an error in 6.7 linux API headers specifically the step

 make headers_check

 I get the following error:

 CHK include/linux/version.h
 UPD include/linux/version.h
 HOSTCC  scripts/basic/fixdep
 gcc: error trying to exec

 '/tools/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.1/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/as':
 execv: No such file or directory
 make[1]: *** [scripts/basic/fixdep] Error 1
 make: *** [scripts_basic] Error 2

 There are a whole lot of previous posts with the exact same error. But
 a resolution was not posted. I've checked my GCC/Binutils compile logs
 and they seem to be alright. The sanity tests passed as well. So I've
 kind of hit a dead end here. Any help is much appreciated.

 Thanks,
 Anand
 --
 http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
 FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
 Unsubscribe: See the above information page



I've passed this step perfectly.in my experience ,you should uncompress the
linux in source directory,and then cd into linux subdirectory,then do all
following the book.
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page