On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 19:43 +0300, Эмиль Кранц wrote:
By trial and error I have found that any action that takes more than
one SBU in LFS is better off with -j1.
BLFS packages are more agreeable with -j2 switch.
On my dual core machine only kernel compiles flawlessly with -j2
switch.
I expect every chip has its peculiarities, and my CPUs are not an exception.
I failed to build LFS-6.8 (if I remember correctly, it was before 7.0 for
sure) with -j2, however all worked fine with -j1.
I haven't tried building in parallel on my later builds though, so maybe I
should.
On the other
On 5/16/2012 12:22 AM, lei huang wrote:
help help!!!
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:01 AM, lei huangcode.huang...@gmail.com wrote:
system: centos5.8 linux2.6.18 gcc44
lfs: binutils-2.22 gcc-4.7.0 glibc-2.15
lfs-man Linux From Scratch - Version SVN-20120513
build glibc erro:
gcc44 -nostdlib
From: bl8r1...@tut.by
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 14:33:12 +0300
To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] LFS-7.1: 6.37. Automake-1.11.3 (TEST FAILURE)!
I expect every chip has its peculiarities, and my CPUs are not an exception.
I failed to build LFS-6.8 (if I remember
