On 06/26/2012 10:18 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
The /boot partition is rarely written. The purpose of a journaled file
system is to recover written data in a cache that is in the journal an
not properly committed to the disk in the case of a power/system
failure. Making /boot ext3 is OK, but it
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Ken Moffat zarniwh...@ntlworld.comwrote:
ext3 should be ok for /boot. fsck will be run on *all* the
filesystems in fstab which are automounted and in need of an fsck.
Understood. Thanks.
Thanks, I didn't know that file could do that!
No worries. I
=0755,nosuid 0 0
# End /etc/fstab
Thanks.
Alexander Kapshuk.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
What this mean? I have four partitions:
Partition Mount Point Description
sda1 / Initial OS, CentOS.
sda2 swap Swap for the initial OS.
sda3 swap Swap for LFS
sda4
What patch would that be?
The book doesn't mention any.
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 5:35 PM, xinglp xin...@gmail.com wrote:
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
--
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:10 PM, xinglp xin...@gmail.com wrote:
在 2012年3月29日 下午11:03，Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps...@gmail.com 写道：
What patch would that be?
The book doesn't mention any.
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter05/binutils-pass2.html
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:10 PM, xinglp xin...@gmail.com wrote:
在 2012年3月29日 下午11:03，Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps...@gmail.com 写道：
What patch would that be?
The book doesn't mention any.
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter05/binutils-pass2.html
On 03/29/2012 07:58 PM, xinglp wrote:
在 2012年3月29日 下午11:58，Alexander Kapshukalexander.kaps...@gmail.com 写道：
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:10 PM, xinglpxin...@gmail.com wrote:
在 2012年3月29日 下午11:03，Alexander Kapshukalexander.kaps...@gmail.com 写道：
What patch would that be?
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:01 PM, ankit vishwakarma
ankitvishwakarma0...@gmail.com wrote:
please provide me help on the following error i started all the
process from the beginning still the error persists.
In file included from ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syslog.c:10:0:
../misc/syslog.c:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Sumeet Shekhar sshekhar.s...@gmail.comwrote:
I am not getting any output while running the program dummy.c after
GCC pass2 installation.
Also it says that create gcc-build directory again. Should i remove
the previous gcc-build and build it again or create
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Simon Geard delga...@ihug.co.nz wrote:
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 21:54 +0200, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
(6). While still in $LFS/sources/gcc-build, I ran ln -sv ../usr/bin/cpp
/lib; And this is where I found it confusing, ../usr/bin/cpp ==
$LFS/sources/usr/bin
an absolute or a relative path;
I hope I'm making sense here.
Anyway, thanks a lot to all those who responded to my query. I reckon
it'll make more sense as I progress through the book.
Alexander Kapshuk.
On 03/21/2012 10:07 AM, Simon Geard wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 16:50 +0200, Alexander
Got it. Thanks.
It's relative to /lib, not $LFS/sources/gcc-build as I had thought
initially.
I'll have another look at ln(1).
On 03/21/2012 10:25 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 09:54:18PM +0200, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
(6). While still in $LFS/sources/gcc-build, I ran
While working on '6.17.1. Installation of GCC', I created and cd'd into
'/sources/gcc-build'. One of the instructions suggests creating this
symlink, 'ln -sv ../usr/bin/cpp /lib'. I assumed that I was supposed to run
the command line while still in '/sources/gcc-build'. If that is the case,
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Rick Shelton rick.shel...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Alexander Kapshuk
alexander.kaps...@gmail.com wrote:
While working on '6.17.1. Installation of GCC', I created and cd'd into
'/sources/gcc-build'. One of the instructions suggests
15 matches
Mail list logo
