On 11/3/05, Matthew Burgess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doug Ronne wrote:
There is a chance this should go to the alfs list since that is where
I first ran into the trouble, but I got the error by hand too. During
the second pass of gcc, I get a bunch of errors and the first error
On 11/3/05, Dan Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/3/05, Doug Ronne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/3/05, Matthew Burgess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Right you are. I eventually came to the realization that alfs was not
performing the scripts up front correctly and the fixincludes script
There is a chance this should go to the alfs list since that is where
I first ran into the trouble, but I got the error by hand too. During
the second pass of gcc, I get a bunch of errors and the first error
that shows up is with /usr/included/gmp.h (a huge pile of syntax
errors). Now I didn't
If my disk wouldn't mount because of a bad superblock, and I booted in
another filesystem to run e2fsck which just gave error after error
eventually ending in a filesystem that had nothing but a lost+found
directory full of numbered files, is there any way of salvaging
anything off that partition?
On 10/19/05, Jim Gifford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doug,
I just started to test that version. All the glibc snapshots after
20050926 have had issue's building with cross-lfs. I'll let you know
about this one, once I have completed testing.
ah, that might explain why I was having errors
In my general playing around, I was interested in using a
glibc-snapshot (20051017) for a lfs. But when I tried to just install
it in place of glibc-2.3.5 in the current svn lfs it errors out with:
/mnt/lfs/sources/lfs/glibc-build/libc.a(iofclose.o):(.eh_frame+0x11): undefined
reference to
On 10/19/05, Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure, drink copious amounts of beer. Well, it passes the time!
Ok, I'll try that.
But
seriously, I'm trying this week's snapshot on x86_64 just for the hell
of it - builds fine, test results similar to previous versions (on
32-bit
On 10/19/05, Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005, Doug Ronne wrote:
Are you using glibc-20051017.tar.bz2, or one of the
other tarballs (glibc-2.3, glibc-ports) ? i686 ?
I have done the cross-lfs on an x86_64 before and had no trouble
there. Maybe that is the key
On 10/17/05, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 17:04 -0700, Doug Ronne wrote:
has anyone compiled the esp ghostscript successfully with gcc4?
Yes, I have. Didn't notice any issues whatsoever. I don't believe
I had Fortran installed at the time. I used GCC-4.0.1
Lets say you wanted to re-compile and install your copy of gcc and you
didn't want some of the files lying around, maybe you didn't want some
ada compiler anymore or something, and you wanted to make sure that
you didn't have leftovers from the previous copy. How would you do
that? The make
On 10/14/05, Declan Moriarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words
I have 2 LFS installs on my Dell Inspiron laptop. One of them is a
lfs-dev gcc 3.4.3 system with -O3, -march=pentium-m, and -ffast-math
flags and the other is a gcc 4.0.1 with no special
On 8/18/05, David Courtney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I'll probably have to start over.
I was just looking at my BASH history. I found a typo in one of my
commands. It didn't report an error so I didn't notice it.
After compiling binutils, I accidentally typed make -C ld
On 8/19/05, lux-integ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The external samba server mentioned has two shares; a public share that
requires no password and a normal share that requires authentication. I am
experiencing difficulty mounting either. I have tried various options after
the -o tag. Examples of
On 8/16/05, Joseph M Dupre (AVAB Inc.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is this second processor??? Where is this SMP MP-table that the
kernel is finding, and why is it on a single processor machine?
Does your bios have hyperthreading enabled? Some intel CPUs (or is it
motherboards?) have a
The most common reason for no sound in my experience is that the alsa
mixer defaults to no volume. try running alsamixer, use up arrow to
crank up the main volume, hit , to turn it on, and do the same with
pcm.
-Doug
On 8/15/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings:
I have
On 8/15/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've built the following into the kernel:
Sound Card Support
Advanced Linux Sound Architecture
OSS Mixer API
OSS PCM (digital audio) PCI
ATI IXP AC97 Controller
Intel/SiS/nVidia/AMD Ali AC97 Controller
Open Sound System
Intel
On 8/15/05, guo tie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
../../gcc-3.4.4/gcc/tsystem.h:79:19: stdio.h: No such file or directory
../../gcc-3.4.4/gcc/tsystem.h:82:23: sys/types.h: No such file or directory
../../gcc-3.4.4/gcc/tsystem.h:85:19: errno.h: No such file or directory
I am using Version 7.0-cross-lfs-20050814-x86_64
In section 10.3 when I ran make check, it failed on libc.cat (in
catgets/de/libc.cat). I went away, accidentally closed the terminal,
and ran it again to get the message so that I could send it in... and
it passed. Does this mean I am good to go?
On 8/14/05, steve crosby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/15/05, Doug Ronne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using Version 7.0-cross-lfs-20050814-x86_64
In section 10.3 when I ran make check, it failed on libc.cat (in
catgets/de/libc.cat). I went away, accidentally closed the terminal
And the open source drivers do not have 3D support, multihead support,
or TV-out support. There are a lot of good reasons for using the
nvidia drivers.
-Doug
On 4/15/05, Jeremy Huntwork [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Benton wrote:
Donal Farrell wrote:
Yes, give up on the closed source
They do not come with the free version, you have to go get them yourself.
-Doug
On Apr 1, 2005 11:27 AM, Matthew Burgess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robinlinux wrote:
it is possible that suse it does not have flex and bison installs and these
infuences the compilation?
Yep, it's a
I have been trying to build LFS 6.0 on my x86_64 and want to keep it
open to multilib in the future at least. So I have been building with
--libdir=/tools/lib64. However some things put themselves in lib, and
when I try to check gcc in adjusting the toolchain (section 5.9) it
gives me an error:
22 matches
Mail list logo
