On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 11:03 -0600, Dan McGhee wrote:
> On the other hand, I can understand another possible difference unless
> I don't understand what "hot-plug" means. To me it's the ability to
> "plug something in" while the computer is running and have it
> work--much like a USB device. If m
On 11/26/2013 11:52 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Dan McGhee wrote:
>
>> From reading that "policy statement" in the man
>> page, I think my NIC should also be named "enpXsY" but it's "eth0."
> That's because you ran the init-net-rules.sh script as a part of the
> udev installation.
>
> -- Bruce
>
Dan McGhee wrote:
> From reading that "policy statement" in the man
> page, I think my NIC should also be named "enpXsY" but it's "eth0."
That's because you ran the init-net-rules.sh script as a part of the
udev installation.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-sup
On 11/26/2013 11:23 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Dan McGhee wrote:
>> On 11/26/2013 07:53 AM, William Harrington wrote:
>>> On Nov 25, 2013, at 8:06 PM, Dan McGhee wrote:
>>>
There were many allusions to the "new naming convention." enpxx for
ethernet and wlpxx for wireless. Where does this
Dan McGhee wrote:
> On 11/26/2013 07:53 AM, William Harrington wrote:
>> On Nov 25, 2013, at 8:06 PM, Dan McGhee wrote:
>>
>>> There were many allusions to the "new naming convention." enpxx for
>>> ethernet and wlpxx for wireless. Where does this name convention
>>> exist? I remember that xlngl
On 11/26/2013 07:53 AM, William Harrington wrote:
On Nov 25, 2013, at 8:06 PM, Dan McGhee wrote:
There were many allusions to the "new naming convention." enpxx for
ethernet and wlpxx for wireless. Where does this name convention
exist? I remember that xlnglp posted about what he had discove
On Nov 25, 2013, at 8:06 PM, Dan McGhee wrote:
> There were many allusions to the "new naming convention." enpxx for
> ethernet and wlpxx for wireless. Where does this name convention
> exist? I remember that xlnglp posted about what he had discovered in
> the "different" names, but I can't fi
On 11/25/2013 9:06 PM, Dan McGhee wrote:
> ...
> Here's the mystery for me: Alan and I have the same NIC. We probably
> have different boxes, but I don't think that's relevant. He built
> LFS-7.4 just like I did. Kernel 3.10.10 + identical NIC = same kernel
> configuration. However, his NIC is
With all the interest in helping Alan to get his ethernet card working,
one of the things that caught my attention was the name that appeared
for him in "/sys/class/net." I googled "enp3s0" and saw many, many
threads in different lists and fora about exactly the same situation.
People couldn'
