On 07/14/2010 04:50 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
On 14/07/10 20:18, Dan McGhee wrote:
In addition to the testing failures I've documented in another thread,
I've also had an installation failure with GlibC-2.11.2. I know the
cause though. It's a result of using the More Control and Package
In addition to the testing failures I've documented in another thread,
I've also had an installation failure with GlibC-2.11.2. I know the
cause though. It's a result of using the More Control and Package User
package management system. I've encountered similar things in my
previous builds,
On 14 July 2010 20:18, Dan McGhee beesn...@grm.net wrote:
The GlibC install wants to install sg.h, scsi.h and scsi_ioctl.h in
/usr/include/scsi. There are two ways in which to get the install
process to proceed. The first is for me to manually remove scsi.h and
let glibc do it's thing.
On 07/14/2010 02:33 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
If you weren't using the package users hint, the problem would not
arise. Therefore we can assume that allowing the kernel's headers
to be installed is the well-tested choice.
You are absolutely right, but I would not characterize it as a
On 14/07/10 20:18, Dan McGhee wrote:
In addition to the testing failures I've documented in another thread,
I've also had an installation failure with GlibC-2.11.2. I know the
cause though. It's a result of using the More Control and Package User
package management system. I've encountered
On 14/07/10 21:10, Dan McGhee wrote:
On 07/14/2010 02:33 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
If you weren't using the package users hint, the problem would not
arise. Therefore we can assume that allowing the kernel's headers
to be installed is the well-tested choice.
You are absolutely right, but I
On 07/14/2010 04:50 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
If you don't replace the kernel's /usr/include/scsi/scsi.h with hte one
from glibc then you will get build failures later on. I think it was
udev which failed? Some other things in BLFS (cdrtools?) also fail. Just
do what a normal LFS install would
On Wednesday 14 July 2010 18:07:13 Dan McGhee wrote:
I hope everyone who reads this is getting a good laugh.
No, just chuckling and nodding knowingly. As I hobble around on my
bullet-riddled feet. Need the t-shirt?
As long as *you* are laughing, all is well.
--
On 07/14/2010 05:23 PM, Neal Murphy wrote:
On Wednesday 14 July 2010 18:07:13 Dan McGhee wrote:
I hope everyone who reads this is getting a good laugh.
No, just chuckling and nodding knowingly. As I hobble around on my
bullet-riddled feet. Need the t-shirt?
As long as *you* are
Dan McGhee wrote:
You are absolutely right, but I would not characterize it as a problem,
but something to be considered and about which to make a decision. In
fact, it's the reason I posted. Using only the instructions in the LFS
book, this header file would be replaced three
10 matches
Mail list logo
