On my X86_64 lfs (SVN-20110427) system .
/dev/disk/by-label/xxx has not turnd up when mountfs started , so
I can't use LABEL= in fstab .
On 32bits system , this works well.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 07:25 +0800, xinglp wrote:
On my X86_64 lfs (SVN-20110427) system .
/dev/disk/by-label/xxx has not turnd up when mountfs started , so
I can't use LABEL= in fstab .
On 32bits system , this works well.
Maybe related, I've noticed problems with a 32-bit system using
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 13:17 +1200, Simon Geard wrote:
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 07:25 +0800, xinglp wrote:
On my X86_64 lfs (SVN-20110427) system .
/dev/disk/by-label/xxx has not turnd up when mountfs started , so
I can't use LABEL= in fstab .
On 32bits system , this works well.
Maybe
On Saturday 30 April 2011 21:32:01 Simon Geard wrote:
I'd have expected 'udevadm settle' to block while this stuff's still
happening - is that not the case, maybe with 168?
I'd be real surprised if settle doesn't work.
They haven't removed it *that* soon, have they? (There's been talk about
Simon Geard wrote:
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 13:17 +1200, Simon Geard wrote:
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 07:25 +0800, xinglp wrote:
On my X86_64 lfs (SVN-20110427) system .
/dev/disk/by-label/xxx has not turnd up when mountfs started , so
I can't use LABEL= in fstab .
On 32bits system , this
Apr 30, 2011 09:50:09 PM, Bruce wrote: perhaps a sleep( 2 ) before or after after '/sbin/udevadm settle' in the udev script would isolate the problem.You're right. On a slower machine, where I played with 168a "sleep 3" (for good measure - worked with 2 secs. as well)just before the end (::) of
Apr 30, 2011 09:50:09 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
perhaps a sleep( 2 ) before or after after '/sbin/udevadm settle'
in the udev script would isolate the problem.
You're right. On a slower machine, where I played with 168
a sleep 3 (for good measure - worked with 2 secs. as well)
just before the
