On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 02:31:18PM -0800, Paul Rogers wrote:
> > >
> > > Short answer: I've no idea, I get rid of /tools as soon as possible.
> > >
> > > Longer answer : how are you going to use /tools ? If you are able
> > > to chroot from the current system, or just put it at the front of
> > >
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 03:43:06PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Dutch Ingraham wrote:
> >Hi all:
> >
> >It seems the link to download the gpm file is down (109'd), including the
> >mirrors listed on the github page.
> >
> >I don't know if this is old news, or just a temporary glitch, but wanted
> >t
> >>> We use to recommend rebuilding everything when rebuilding the
> >>> toolchain, then some of us accepted that we might get away with
> >>> fixing the same version of glibc in-place.
> >>
> >> I was thinking of just this. That's one reason I chose the firewall
> >> mitigation. My "best"(?) th
Dutch Ingraham wrote:
Hi all:
It seems the link to download the gpm file is down (109'd), including the
mirrors listed on the github page.
I don't know if this is old news, or just a temporary glitch, but wanted
to FYI.
If there is anywhere else to grab a copy, I'd be grateful!
See
http://ww
On 02/22/2016 03:32 PM, spiky wrote:
On 22/02/16 21:28, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
Hi all:
It seems the link to download the gpm file is down (109'd), including
the mirrors listed on the github page.
I don't know if this is old news, or just a temporary glitch, but
wanted to FYI.
If there is any
On 22/02/16 21:28, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
Hi all:
It seems the link to download the gpm file is down (109'd), including
the mirrors listed on the github page.
I don't know if this is old news, or just a temporary glitch, but
wanted to FYI.
If there is anywhere else to grab a copy, I'd be
Hi all:
It seems the link to download the gpm file is down (109'd), including
the mirrors listed on the github page.
I don't know if this is old news, or just a temporary glitch, but wanted
to FYI.
If there is anywhere else to grab a copy, I'd be grateful!
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.o
On 02/22/16 22:05, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 08:55:42PM +0100, Tim Tassonis wrote:
Hi all
Due to CVE-2015-7547, I have upgraded glibc to a patched version on three
systems now and after the upgrade the reboot hung on two of them. After a
power cycle, they both came up nicely aga
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 08:55:42PM +0100, Tim Tassonis wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Due to CVE-2015-7547, I have upgraded glibc to a patched version on three
> systems now and after the upgrade the reboot hung on two of them. After a
> power cycle, they both came up nicely again.
>
If you have a console,
Hi all
Due to CVE-2015-7547, I have upgraded glibc to a patched version on
three systems now and after the upgrade the reboot hung on two of them.
After a power cycle, they both came up nicely again.
On the third, I reloaded init by calling
init u
before the reboot and the reboot went fine.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:49:17AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Dutch Ingraham wrote:
> >Hello all:
> >
> >I just finished installing LFS 7.9-rc1 (OK - so I'm a little behind!) and
> >upon rebooting, I noticed I have no man binary.
> >
> >I then went to re-configure and re-install man-db, but the co
Dutch Ingraham wrote:
Hello all:
I just finished installing LFS 7.9-rc1 (OK - so I'm a little behind!) and
upon rebooting, I noticed I have no man binary.
I then went to re-configure and re-install man-db, but the configure script
errors out with the message "configure: error: Fatal: no support
On 02/22/2016 12:40 PM, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
Hello all:
I just finished installing LFS 7.9-rc1 (OK - so I'm a little behind!) and
upon rebooting, I noticed I have no man binary.
I then went to re-configure and re-install man-db, but the configure script
errors out with the message "configure:
Hello all:
I just finished installing LFS 7.9-rc1 (OK - so I'm a little behind!) and
upon rebooting, I noticed I have no man binary.
I then went to re-configure and re-install man-db, but the configure script
errors out with the message "configure: error: Fatal: no supported database
library/he
Le lundi 22 février à 11:49, martynvidler a écrit :
> Chapter ^6 is carried out as user "root"
Sorry for the noise ; I'm stupid :-( Many thanks.
--
Ph. Delavalade
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the ab
On 22/02/16 09:39, Philippe Delavalade wrote:
Hi all.
I'm building svn-11023 ; my host is slackware 14.1. Every thing goes right
in chapter 5.
When creating, as user lfs, /dev, /proc, etc. in 6.2, I obtained
"permission denied".
I followed the book strictly (and it's not my first build) excep
On 22/02/2016 10:39, Philippe Delavalade wrote:
Hi all.
I'm building svn-11023 ; my host is slackware 14.1. Every thing goes right
in chapter 5.
When creating, as user lfs, /dev, /proc, etc. in 6.2, I obtained
"permission denied".
I followed the book strictly (and it's not my first build) exce
Hi all.
I'm building svn-11023 ; my host is slackware 14.1. Every thing goes right
in chapter 5.
When creating, as user lfs, /dev, /proc, etc. in 6.2, I obtained
"permission denied".
I followed the book strictly (and it's not my first build) except a small
deviation :-) LFS=/lfs instead of /mnt/
18 matches
Mail list logo
