Re: [lfs-support] Can Regular Users Contribute?

lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer) wrote: > (Top-posting as I gather that can be useful re accessibility stuff: is that correct?) It doesn't matter to me personally. A lot of lists for vi folks do top post though. I strike a compromise between the ones that do and the ones like this which bottom

Re: [lfs-support] Can Regular Users Contribute?

Rob wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: The way this type of thing is handled is by someone writing a hint: Do I have to join the hints list (I'm already on way too many lists as is) or can I send you the hint directly. You can just post it hre or send to me directly. --

Re: [lfs-support] Can Regular Users Contribute?

(Top-posting as I gather that can be useful re accessibility stuff: is that correct?) I'd certainly be very interested in learning such info in practice. Although the software side would be the main info, if possible could there be some details on hardware that would be used typically. akh >

Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.1-rc. Inetutils-1.9.4. All tests passed immediately after building.

On 27/08/2016 10:35, Hazel Russman wrote: > The Good Book says: > > One test, libls.sh, is known to fail due to hard coding of some support > program paths. All tests pass if the tests are rerun at the end of Chapter 6. > > That doesn't seem to be the case any more. Not on my system anyway. >

Re: [lfs-support] lfs-support Digest, Vol 563, Issue 1

On 27/08/2016 06:53, Sumit Kokal wrote: > Hello, > Hello sir, my first pass is successfully done..all packages are properly > installed,and M move to pass 2. First package is binutils.when im configure > the error is that" c compiler can not create executable " i try 3-4 times but > same error