Re: Warning on running "make check", second round

2005-07-11 Thread Stephen Liu
Hi Chris, - snip - > Actually, it's a different error (look carefully - > it's "tst-cancelx17" > - before it was "tst-cancel17"). That's the other > known frequent-failing > test, also fixed by the patch in the latest LFS. > That error can also be > ignored. Try "make check" again. Performed

LFS-Version 7.0-cross-lfs-20050707-x86_64

2005-07-11 Thread Luca
Hi all! When I give the command LFSHOME=`su - lfs -c 'echo $HOME'` in chapter 4.5 Creating the $HOME/cross-tools Directory everything hangs. How to solve the problem? Host system is SuSE 9.1, cpu is athlon64. Thanks in advance, Luca Piol -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-

Re: Hotplug, hotplug-ng, & udev: Versions?

2005-07-11 Thread Declan Moriarty
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words > Declan Moriarty wrote: > > >On the basis that udev-059 should have improved things, (but didn't); > >udev-060 should have fixed that (but didn't); So udev-061 must work... > > And our survey said"possibly not" :) Try udev-062! Too late... Ude

Segmentation fault

2005-07-11 Thread Stephen Liu
Hi folks, 6.11.1. Installation of Glibc http://www.sg.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/6.0/chapter06/glibc.html upto root:/sources/glibc-build# touch /etc/ld.so.conf root:/sources/glibc-build# make install All went through without problem Now coming to re-do root:/sources/glibc-build# mkdir -p

Re: Hotplug, hotplug-ng, & udev: Versions?

2005-07-11 Thread Joern Abatz
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 10:45:07PM +0100, Declan Moriarty wrote: > > Mind you, I STILL have no /dev/hdc, or /dev/hdd. /proc/ide/ide0 shows me > hda (all nodes present & correct). There is no hdb in the box. > > /proc/ide/ide1 shows me hdc & hdd as cdroms in the media file. hdd is > actually a dvd

Re: LFS-Version 7.0-cross-lfs-20050707-x86_64

2005-07-11 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Luca wrote: > Hi all! > > When I give the command LFSHOME=`su - lfs -c 'echo $HOME'` in chapter > 4.5 Creating the $HOME/cross-tools Directory everything hangs. How to > solve the problem? > Host system is SuSE 9.1, cpu is athlon64. > > Thanks in advance, > Luca Piol > > Thi

Re: LFS-Version 7.0-cross-lfs-20050707-x86_64

2005-07-11 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Luca wrote: Hi all! When I give the command LFSHOME=`su - lfs -c 'echo $HOME'` in chapter 4.5 Creating the $HOME/cross-tools Directory everything hangs. How to solve the problem? Host system is SuSE 9.1, cpu is athlon64. What exactly do you mean 'everything hangs'? Are you able to use anoth

Binutils version change

2005-07-11 Thread Daryn Neadow
Does anyone know why the version of binutils was dropped back for the just released 6.1 version? The last SVN version I was running was 20050608 and had binutils-2.16 in it while the 6.1 version just released has 2.15.94.0.2.2? Thanks -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-suppor

Re: Warning on running "make check", second round

2005-07-11 Thread Chris Staub
Stephen Liu wrote: Hi Chris, - snip - Actually, it's a different error (look carefully - it's "tst-cancelx17" - before it was "tst-cancel17"). That's the other known frequent-failing test, also fixed by the patch in the latest LFS. That error can also be ignored. Try "make check" again.

Re: Warning on running "make check", second round

2005-07-11 Thread Stephen Liu
Hi Chris, > No, don't apply the patch - that won't work because > the glibc versions Oh, sorry, too late here, done already. I re-ran, the second time, # make check To my surprise this time it went through without complaint/warning. Later I encountered another problem of "Segmentation fault'.

Re: Binutils version change

2005-07-11 Thread Matthew Burgess
Daryn Neadow wrote: Does anyone know why the version of binutils was dropped back for the just released 6.1 version? The last SVN version I was running was 20050608 and had binutils-2.16 in it while the 6.1 version just released has 2.15.94.0.2.2? It didn't drop back. The way we develop the b

udevsend and hotplug

2005-07-11 Thread kareemy
Hello, I noticed that the lfs bootscripts changed to echo /sbin/udevsend into /proc/sys/kernel/hotplug instead of /sbin/hotplug. Does hotplug ever get called anymore in this case? My problem is with my digital camera. It does not have a /dev entry. When I plug it in, a new entry is created in /p

glibc "make check" error

2005-07-11 Thread David Rosal
Hi. Trying to build LFS-6.1: Chapter VI, glibc-2.3.4: "make" went fine, but "make check" fails: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: make check (...) GCONV_PATH=/sources/glibc-build/iconvdata LC_ALL=C LOCPATH=/sources/glibc-build/localedata /sources/glibc-build/elf/ld-linux.so.2 --library-path /sources/glibc-

Re: udevsend and hotplug

2005-07-11 Thread Dan McGhee
kareemy wrote: Hello, I noticed that the lfs bootscripts changed to echo /sbin/udevsend into /proc/sys/kernel/hotplug instead of /sbin/hotplug. Does hotplug ever get called anymore in this case? My problem is with my digital camera. It does not have a /dev entry. When I plug it in, a new entr

Re: glibc "make check" error

2005-07-11 Thread David Rosal
Hi. I've tried "make check" again and the problem was fixed automagically. There was a spiritual problem that affected the connections between the electronic devices of my computer. But finally harmony was re-established between the transistors, and the buses were unblocked permitting the pure

Re: udevsend and hotplug

2005-07-11 Thread kareemy
On 7/11/05, Dan McGhee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > kareemy wrote: > > >Hello, > > > >I noticed that the lfs bootscripts changed to echo /sbin/udevsend into > >/proc/sys/kernel/hotplug instead of /sbin/hotplug. > > > >Does hotplug ever get called anymore in this case? > > > >My problem is with my

Re: udevsend and hotplug

2005-07-11 Thread steve crosby
On 7/12/05, kareemy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/11/05, Dan McGhee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > kareemy wrote: > > > > Thank you. I have read that. It provided some insight as to how > udev+hotplug are supposed to work but didn't quite solve my issue. In > the meantime I found two possib