On Mon, 2010-06-07 at 17:45 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
That's not so easy. We create the book with Docbook xml. I don't know
of a way to to do that. We do have both a change log and a What's new
section. We are trying to do a new release every 6 months. If you look
at What's new, almost
Hello everybody,
I am new to this mailing list and this is also my first try to build a LFS. I
am using Linux for several years now and decided now to try to build my own
Linux.
Ok, now for my building environment. If there are any infos missing, just ask:
Base system: Debian kernel
On 08/06/10 10:05, Rademaker, Pascal (Dealis) wrote:
mawk: scripts/gen-sorted.awk: line 19: regular expression compile failed
(bad class -- [], [^] or [)
/[^
mawk: scripts/gen-sorted.awk: line 19: syntax error at or near ]
mawk: scripts/gen-sorted.awk: line 19: runaway regular expression /, ,
Ups, that could be the point!
Many, many thanks Andy!!!
I will report again, but I guess, that´s it!
Greetings
Pascal
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: lfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org
[mailto:lfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org] Im Auftrag von Andrew Benton
Gesendet:
On 07/06/10 16:35, linux fan wrote:
# Hack to solve glibc __stack_chk_guard cross compile ( 2.4 :)
# this schpeel in LFS-6.6 ch5 gcc-pass1 and ch5 gcc-pass2 after unpack:
glibc=$(ls /lib/libc-*.so)
read j1 v[0] v[1] v[2] j2 ${glibc//[-.]/ }
if (( v[0] 2 )) || (( v[1] 4 )) [ -f
That's not so easy. We create the book with Docbook xml. I don't know
of a way to to do that. We do have both a change log and a What's new
section. We are trying to do a new release every 6 months. If you look
at What's new, almost every package changes each time, but most use
the
On 6/8/10, Andrew Benton b3n...@gmail.com wrote:
shouldn't that be
if (( ${v[0]} 2 )) (( ${v[1]} 4 ))
or maybe (( v[0] == 2 )) (( v[1] 4 ))
... bash (( allowed me to omit $ and {} around variables/arrays ))
But in the target lfs-6.6, glibc 2.4 is true, so the test isn't even needed.
On 6/8/10, Andrew Benton b3n...@gmail.com wrote:
so the whole thing can be reduced to:
v=($(ls /lib/libc-*.so | sed 's/[.-]/ /g'))
[ (( ${v[1]} 2 )) (( ${v[2]} 4 )) ]
sed -i '/k prot/agcc_cv_libc_provides_ssp=yes' ../gcc-4.5.0/gcc/configure
[ $(ls /lib/libc-*.so \
| sed 's/[.-]/
I don't recall the book saying anything about it, possibly runlevel
3 is so typical it has never come up, but as I mentioned a week ago
or so, I think there would be an advantage to building LFS within
runlevel 2--where there's no network running, no chance of some
external attack on a vulnerable
mawk: scripts/gen-sorted.awk: line 19: regular expression compile failed
(bad class -- [], [^] or [)
/[^
mawk: scripts/gen-sorted.awk: line 19: syntax error at or near ]
mawk: scripts/gen-sorted.awk: line 19: runaway regular expression /, ,
I've never used mawk, so I'm not familiar how
Paul Rogers wrote:
I don't recall the book saying anything about it, possibly runlevel
3 is so typical it has never come up, but as I mentioned a week ago
or so, I think there would be an advantage to building LFS within
runlevel 2--where there's no network running, no chance of some
external
Neal Murphy wrote:
That's not so easy. We create the book with Docbook xml. I don't know
of a way to to do that. We do have both a change log and a What's new
section. We are trying to do a new release every 6 months. If you look
at What's new, almost every package changes each time, but
On Tuesday 08 June 2010 11:48:52 Paul Rogers wrote:
mawk: scripts/gen-sorted.awk: line 19: regular expression compile failed
(bad class -- [], [^] or [)
/[^
mawk: scripts/gen-sorted.awk: line 19: syntax error at or near ]
mawk: scripts/gen-sorted.awk: line 19: runaway regular expression
Hi,
Started reading and doing what the book says (6.6). Didn't take too
long before I got myself into trouble. :-(
In Host system Requirements, the instructions explicitly wants
'/bin/sh' to be pointing to bash. Mine was pointing to dash. So I
endeavoured to change it by deleting the symlink
piper.guy1 wrote:
Hi,
Started reading and doing what the book says (6.6). Didn't take too
long before I got myself into trouble. :-(
In Host system Requirements, the instructions explicitly wants
'/bin/sh' to be pointing to bash. Mine was pointing to dash. So I
endeavoured to change it
On 8 June 2010 21:08, piper.guy1 piper.g...@gmail.com wrote:
Sooo...before I do something else that I'm not suppose to do, I
thought I'd get advise first. My thinking is that I need to get a
Linux rescue or recovery CD, mount the file system on the hard drive,
and then add a symlink to bash.
piper.guy1 wrote:
Hi,
Started reading and doing what the book says (6.6). Didn't take too
long before I got myself into trouble. :-(
Hee hee! Aren't we having fun! Before starting in on something
like this, be sure your backup and recovery procedure works well.
So, join the explicitly non
On 08/06/10 21:54, Mike McCarty wrote:
piper.guy1 wrote:
Sooo...before I do something else that I'm not suppose to do, I
thought I'd get advise first. My thinking is that I need to get a
Linux rescue or recovery CD, mount the file system on the hard drive,
and then add a symlink to bash. Make
I haven't read where piper.guy confirmed that bash is installed or
that if bash is not installed, that changing the link to point to bash
won't help.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above
linux fan wrote:
I haven't read where piper.guy confirmed that bash is installed or
that if bash is not installed, that changing the link to point to bash
won't help.
I don't know of a distro that doesn't install bash by default unless you
are using tomsrtbt.
-- Bruce
--
[ $(ls /lib/libc-*.so \
| sed 's/[.-]/ /g' \ awk '{print ($23 $34) ? foo : bar}') ==
| foo ]
sed -i '/k prot/agcc_cv_libc_provides_ssp=yes' ../gcc-
4.5.0/gcc/configure
Please pardon me being silly.
I think you'd've LOVED APL!
This is better than one sed to insert no- in nscd's
Mike McCarty wrote:
# cd LFS/6.3
# rm -rf build
and deleted /dev from my host system! No discs, no printers, no
terminals, etc. I rebooted with a Knoppix disc, let it populate
/dev, and then mounted my hard drive, and copied (yes copied
using cp) /dev onto my hard drive.
I don't think
Mike McCarty wrote:
Yeah, deleting the link without changing your /etc/passwd entry
to point to a valid shell would do that.
Changing the /etc/password file won't do much. The bootscripts need
/bin/sh.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 5:50 PM, linux fan linuxscra...@gmail.com wrote:
I haven't read where piper.guy confirmed that bash is installed or
that if bash is not installed, that changing the link to point to bash
won't help.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ:
On Tuesday 08 June 2010 19:04:21 Paul Rogers wrote:
You can minimize the interval with ln -sf bash /bin/sh. Then it
stomps on the old link to dash and there's no appreciable interval when
there's no /bin/sh--but it's still not to be advised when it's a shell
something in your tty branch might
On Tuesday 08 June 2010 16:54:52 Mike McCarty wrote:
piper.guy1 wrote:
One more thing. Seeing that this is a very risky thing to be advising
in LFS 6.6, can I suggest that the authour(s) add some caveats around
this instruction?
The best way to do LFS is to pretend you are the computer,
On Tuesday 08 June 2010 18:57:21 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Mike McCarty wrote:
# cd LFS/6.3
# rm -rf build
and deleted /dev from my host system! No discs, no printers, no
terminals, etc. I rebooted with a Knoppix disc, let it populate
/dev, and then mounted my hard drive, and copied (yes
Neal Murphy wrote:
I started playing with UNIX in 1986, and Linux in the
mid-nineties. And just a couple weeks ago, I overwrote a disk that contained
half of a couple striped MD filesystems. Lost nearly 10 years of pics and
history.
No backups? How is this different (in effect) from a
On Tuesday 08 June 2010 20:05:46 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Neal Murphy wrote:
I started playing with UNIX in 1986, and Linux in the
mid-nineties. And just a couple weeks ago, I overwrote a disk that
contained half of a couple striped MD filesystems. Lost nearly 10 years
of pics and history.
No
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 16:08:18 -0400
In Host system Requirements, the instructions explicitly wants
'/bin/sh' to be pointing to bash. Mine was pointing to dash.
under Ubuntu, try sudo dpkg-reconfigure dash.
Any recommendations on a rescue disk?
CDlinux. ( http://cdlinux.info/ )
PS: try
30 matches
Mail list logo
