Where can I set extra routing table.

I use route add -net 192.168.3.0/24 gw 192.168.0.3 to add it. After reboot, it lost. Add it to /etc/rc.d/x or some where else? -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: Where can I set extra routing table.

2009/9/2 Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com: Benjamin John wrote: xinglp schrieb: I use route add -net 192.168.3.0/24 gw 192.168.0.3 to add it. After reboot, it lost. Add it to /etc/rc.d/x or some where else? Create a file in /etc/sysconfig/network-devices/ifconfig.XXX where XXX is your

Is there anything like chkconfig.

That can manage the /etc/rc.d/rcX.d/ /etc/rc.d/rcsysinit.d/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

sysklogd 1.5.0 segfault,1.4.1 works well.

I tested it on both LFS-SVN and LFS-6.5. Do I have to turn on something in the kernel. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: sysklogd 1.5.0 segfault,1.4.1 works well.

bruce.du...@gmail.com: xinglp wrote: I tested it on both LFS-SVN and LFS-6.5. Do I have to turn on something in the kernel. You're a little short of info here.  Does klogd run OK?  Do you get any errors when you build?  I don't know of anything different in the kernel, but which kernel are you

Re: sysklogd 1.5.0 segfault,1.4.1 works well.

strace result is like below [pid 440] read(2, \nGMT-8-8\n, 2048) = 11 [pid 440] close(2)= 0 [pid 440] munmap(0xb7723000, 4096)= 0 [pid 440] write(1, 6May 5 21:58:10 kernel: klogd 1.5.0, log source = /proc/kmsg started.\0, 73) = 73 [pid 440] uname({sys=Linux,

Re: sysklogd 1.5.0 segfault,1.4.1 works well.

I use kernel modules,but never cy System.map before. Yes. I turned on CONFIG_EMBEDDED. I'll turn on CONFIG_KALLSYMS and try again. BTW: I've found something in the udev-151.tar.bz2\README, which help me out boot hang caused by udev. Where can I find something about kernel config, I don't want

Re: sysklogd 1.5.0 segfault,1.4.1 works well.

CONFIG_KALLSYMS fix it. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

xmllint {2-2.6.31,2-2.7.6} segfault on LFS-SVN.

I met it when I build LFS html book. It can be fixed it with ./configure \ --prefix=/usr \ --without-zlib xmlIO.c:2396 2-2.6.31 xmlIO.c:2510 2-2.7.6 /* * Allocate the Input buffer front-end. */ ret = xmlAllocParserInputBuffer(enc); if (ret != NULL) { ret-context =

Re: xmllint {2-2.6.31,2-2.7.6} segfault on LFS-SVN.

/* * Allocate the Input buffer front-end. */ ret = xmlAllocParserInputBuffer(enc); if (ret != NULL) { ret-context = context; ret-readcallback = xmlInputCallbackTable[i].readcallback; ret-closecallback = xmlInputCallbackTable[i].closecallback; #ifdef HAVE_ZLIB_H if

How to create a list of md5 for every package

like this a6de1cc6434cd64038b0a0ae4e252b33 autoconf-2.65.tar.bz2 c2972c4d9b3e29c03d5f2af86249876f automake-1.11.1.tar.bz2 9800d8724815fd84994d9be65ab5e7b8 bash-4.1.tar.gz just like it `make` create wget-list -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ:

Re: How to create a list of md5 for every package

Thanks a lot. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

lfs-svn-9267 md5sum error

md5sum -c .\list.md5 lfs-bootscripts-20100124.tar.bz2: FAILED udev-config-20100128.tar.bz2: FAILED md5sum: WARNING: 2 of 76 computed checksums did NOT match lfs-svn-9267.md5 Description: Binary data -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ:

Re: GMP incorrectly detects CPU-VENDOR-OS triplet

I've met something like that when I turn on optimize in jhalfs. I fix it by ./configure ABI=32. 2010/5/15 Aleksandar Kuktin akuk...@gmail.com On Fri, 14 May 2010 22:20:32 +0100 Ken Moffat zarniwhoo...@googlemail.com wrote: On 14 May 2010 20:03, Prashant R Keshvani (Baijoo)

/bin/pidof error sym link in 6.53

6.53. Psmisc-22.11 ln -sv killall /bin/pidof 6.56. Sysvinit-2.86 sysvinit-2.86/src/Makefile:126 ln -sf ../sbin/killall5 $(ROOT)/bin/pidof -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the

Re: /bin/pidof error sym link in 6.53

Install sysvinit-2.86 overwrite /bin/pidof. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: /bin/pidof error sym link in 6.53

You are right. I found the If Sysvinit will not be used for a particular system, complete the installation of Psmisc by creating the following symlink:. And I also fount Psmisc's pidof does not work with lfs-bootscript. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ:

Is there any wireless script in /etc/sysconfig/network-devices/services/

-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Is it safe to strip --strip-all *.so

lfs svn 6.62. Stripping Again /tools/bin/find /{,usr/}{bin,lib,sbin} -type f -exec /tools/bin/strip --strip-debug '{}' ';' If disk space is very tight, the --strip-all option can be used on the binaries in /{,usr/}{bin,sbin} to gain several more megabytes. Do not use this option on

Re: Is it safe to strip --strip-all *.so

Then is it safe to del all .a libraries. I've found clfs did this. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: Is it safe to strip --strip-all *.so

Thanks. I know .a links into app. When build lfs I configure many packges with --disable-static in chapt 6. some work, some failed, and some still create .a -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above

no glibc-2.12.1-gcc_fix-1.patch

Glibc GCC Build Fix Patch - 2.5 KB: Download: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/lfs/development/glibc-2.12.1-gcc_fix-1.patch MD5 sum: d1f28cb98acb9417fe52596908bbb9fd 404 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html

Re: no glibc-2.12.1-gcc_fix-1.patch

got it at http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/downloads/glibc/glibc-2.12.1-gcc_fix-1.patch -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

lfs svn-20100923 cat: /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules: No such file or directory

log is Fri Sep 24 05:35:11 GMT-8 2010 KB: 886988 / run_command: calling: test udevadm_test: version 162 parse_file: reading '/lib/udev/rules.d/50-firmware.rules' as rules file parse_file: reading '/lib/udev/rules.d/50-udev-default.rules' as rules file parse_file: reading

udev-164-testfiles.tar.bz2 missing

-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: lfs backup, but size changed.

Thanks a lot. I use tar -Sjcf to backup it, and then restore it. They are the same size now. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

sshd show ... oom_adj deprecated, use ... oom_score_adj instead

OpenSSH_5.6p1 OpenSSL 0.9.8o SVN-20101026 dmesg sshd (275): /proc/275/oom_adj is deprecated, please use /proc/275/oom_score_adj instead. I've modify the /etc/rc.d/init.d/sshd, but not work. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ:

Re: Recommended LiveCD?

I actually used the hint to make a Live CD for each of my systems from LFS. Do you mean the hints below? http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hints/downloads/files/lfscd-remastering-howto.txt http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hints/downloads/files/initramfs.txt --

procps-3.2.8 unknown HZ value still turn up in vmware

-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Make a lfs livecd but shutdown-help not execute

# Begin /etc/inittab id:3:initdefault: si::sysinit:/etc/rc.d/init.d/rc sysinit l0:0:wait:/etc/rc.d/init.d/rc 0 l1:S1:wait:/etc/rc.d/init.d/rc 1 l2:2:wait:/etc/rc.d/init.d/rc 2 l3:3:wait:/etc/rc.d/init.d/rc 3 l4:4:wait:/etc/rc.d/init.d/rc 4 l5:5:wait:/etc/rc.d/init.d/rc 5

Re: sysklogd 1.5.0 segfault,1.4.1 works well.

I have reported it to upstream. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

tar-1.25 got a tarball file lager than the dir

It was created by cd /usr/share/ tar -jcf ~/doc.tar.bz2 doc. I notice it was larger than ever before. bzip2 -d doc.tar.bz2, got a doc.tar,73M tar -xf doc.tar, got a doc same as /usr/share/doc ,43M Try this magic file. http://wholesalesoffer.com/doc.tar.bz2 --

Re: [Bug-tar] tar-1.25 got a tarball file lager than the dir

If you run the same command again, do you see the same problem with the tar file? It not happen again. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: tar-1.25 got a tarball file lager than the dir

Also, as a side note, the Engrish makes it hard to understand the point that you are trying to prove. sorry about my Egnrish ;-) -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Should xz-utils installed before man-db

It seems that man-db depends on xz-utils. The configure out puts below 111 checking for pic... pic 112 checking for gzip... gzip 113 checking for compress... no 114 checking for bzip2... bzip2 115 checking for xz... xz 116 checking for gzopen in -lz... yes --

jhalfs not work with xz-utils

I patched the jhalfs. Maybe I should patch the lfs book instead. BTW: Is there any tools for editing the lfs book in a easier way, other than vim. diff -Naur jhalfs.orig/LFS/master.sh jhalfs/LFS/master.sh --- jhalfs.orig/LFS/master.sh +++ jhalfs/LFS/master.sh @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ # Grab the

Re: jhalfs not work with xz-utils

It looks like the jhalfs use the below section instead of filename. lfs/{chapter05,chapter06}/xz.xml line 9 ?dbhtml filename=xz-utils.html? 2011/1/6 Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com: xinglp wrote: I patched the jhalfs. Maybe I should patch the lfs book instead. BTW: Is there any tools

Re: Segmentation fault with second stripping

Did you execute the commands below ? logout chroot $LFS /tools/bin/env -i \ HOME=/root TERM=$TERM PS1='\u:\w\$ ' \ PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin \ /tools/bin/bash --login 2011/1/9 Louis Davies davieslingr...@gmail.com: Hi, I am building LFS 6.7 and in my opinion all things

Re: Udev 166 Testfiles missing?

tar -xf udev-165-testfiles.tar.bz2 mv udev-165-testfiles udev-166-testfiles tar -jcf udev-166-testfiles.tar.bz2 udev-166-testfiles done 2011/2/18 Casey Daniels l...@cd.kcfam.net: The Udev 166 Test Files link from the Development appears to be broken Thank You, Casey --

I've updated to ncurses-5.8 linux-2.6.37.2

I've updated to ncurses-5.8 linux-2.6.37.2, then works well on my system. both i386 and x86_64 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Can I be notified when lfs's pkgs updated by upstream.

Sometimes I'd like to update them myself. -- code farmer from lanxiangjixiao -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

what -march= option should be used when building 64bits lfs

-march=i686 should be a common option for 32bits system. And I set to jhalfs's jhalfs/optimize/opt_config.d/O3pipe_march. Then which option for 64bits. -- code farmer from lanxiangjixiao -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ:

Re: what -march= option should be used when building 64bits lfs

2011/3/19 Stuart Stegall kel...@keltor.org: On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 1:12 PM, xinglp xin...@gmail.com wrote: -march=i686 should be a common option for 32bits system. And I set to jhalfs's jhalfs/optimize/opt_config.d/O3pipe_march. Then which option for 64bits. -- code farmer from

gcc-4.6.0-startfiles_fix-1.patch missing

-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

a livecd based on LFS SVN-20110330

I created it by learning the Official LFS LiveCD, but my version has no desktop. jhalfs can run in it. With pkgs ssh, apache, svn, php, nginx, sqlite, mysql, gdb, valgrind Introduction http://smartutils.sf.net/livecd.html Downlowd: http://st.yesit.tk/smartlinux-2011-0402-i386.iso

Re: a livecd based on LFS SVN-20110330

32bits and 64bits together http://sourceforge.net/projects/smartutils/files/smartlinux-2011-0402-dual.iso/download http://st.yesit.tk/smartlinux-2011-0402-dual.iso -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the

Re: a livecd based on LFS SVN-20110330

2011/4/6 bsquared bwcod...@gmail.com: On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 7:09 AM, xinglp xin...@gmail.com wrote: I created it by learning the Official LFS LiveCD, but my version  has no desktop. jhalfs can run in it. With pkgs ssh, apache, svn, php, nginx, sqlite, mysql, gdb, valgrind

Re: jhalfs build report

2011/4/6 Dave Hajoglou dhajog...@gmail.com: I ran a jhalfs build last night and was wondering if anyone want's the report.  I seem to recall that a while back the developers wanted these reports.  The build took just over 4.5 hours. So slow, on my machine, it took

udev168 not work with mountfs of bootscript on x86_64 system ?

On my X86_64 lfs (SVN-20110427) system . /dev/disk/by-label/xxx has not turnd up when mountfs started , so I can't use LABEL= in fstab . On 32bits system , this works well. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html

lfs-bootscripts-20110424 not work since last update

missing /usr/lib/lsb/install_initd -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: What is your nationality?

2011/6/19 Webmaster ad...@hwlyz.tk: Are you American? Or French, Spanish, Germany? I saw there are a lot of Mirror Sites which covered North/South American, European, Asian. I am a Chinese. How did u get throuth the GFW ? -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ:

Re: What is your nationality?

2011/6/19 Webmaster ad...@hwlyz.tk: Ha... GFW does not stop ALL websites! Google, Linuxfromscratch, etc. can be visited. The GFW bans the contents about bad things and politics... do not top post -- Original -- From:  xinglpxin...@gmail.com; Date:  Sun, Jun

Grub-1.99 show symbol grub_xputs not found on 32bits system.

Grub-1.99 show symbol grub_xputs not found on 32bits system. But it works well on 64bits. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: Grub-1.99 show symbol grub_xputs not found on 32bits system.

2011/6/23 xinglp xin...@gmail.com: Grub-1.99 show symbol grub_xputs not found on 32bits system.  But it works well on 64bits. May be my mistake, I'll check it later -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See

Re: Grub-1.99 show symbol grub_xputs not found on 32bits system.

2011/6/23 xinglp xin...@gmail.com: 2011/6/23 xinglp xin...@gmail.com: Grub-1.99 show symbol grub_xputs not found on 32bits system.  But it works well on 64bits. May be my mistake, I'll check it later It's like that I can't use entire the disk (/dev/sda, partitionless) formatted

Re: Grub-1.99 show symbol grub_xputs not found on 32bits system.

2011/6/23 Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com: xinglp wrote: 2011/6/23 xinglp xin...@gmail.com: 2011/6/23 xinglp xin...@gmail.com: Grub-1.99 show symbol grub_xputs not found on 32bits system.  But it works well on 64bits. May be my mistake, I'll check it later It's like that I can't use

gcc-4.6.1-cross_compile-1.patch gcc-4.6.1-startfiles_fix-1.patch not available

-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

[lfs-support] in Binutils-2.22 - Pass 2 should patch the source before cd ../binutils-build

-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [lfs-support] in Binutils-2.22 - Pass 2 should patch the source before cd ../binutils-build

to prevent a build failure when using compiler optimizations: patch -Np1 -i ../binutils-2.22-build_fix-1.patch Create a separate build directory again: mkdir -v ../binutils-build cd ../binutils-build = On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 5:35 PM, xinglp xin...@gmail.com

[lfs-support] There is a No such file error in chapter 6.6 Creating Essential Files and Symlinks

http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter06/createfiles.html touch /var/log/{btmp,lastlog,wtmp} chgrp -v utmp /var/run/utmp /var/log/lastlog chmod -v 664 /var/run/utmp /var/log/lastlog chmod -v 600 /var/log/btmp The /var/run/utmp was not created by now, shoul this be

Re: [lfs-support] in Binutils-2.22 - Pass 2 should patch the source before cd ../binutils-build

在 2012年3月29日 下午11:58，Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps...@gmail.com 写道： On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:10 PM, xinglp xin...@gmail.com wrote: 在 2012年3月29日 下午11:03，Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps...@gmail.com 写道： What patch would that be? The book doesn't mention any. http

[lfs-support] Can I set Linux text console to use font DejaVuSansMono.ttf.

I've installed the fontconfig, and put DejaVuSansMono.ttf in /usr/share/fonts, and use fc-scan DejaVuSansMono.ttf. And tried to set FONT=/usr/share/fonts/DejaVuSansMono.ttf to /etc/sysconfig/console , and turn on framebuffer, but it did not work. --

Re: [lfs-support] Can I set Linux text console to use font DejaVuSansMono.ttf.

在 2012年4月15日 上午3:38，Ken Moffat zarniwh...@ntlworld.com 写道： On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 02:38:05AM +0800, xinglp wrote: I've installed the fontconfig, and put DejaVuSansMono.ttf in /usr/share/fonts, and use fc-scan DejaVuSansMono.ttf. And tried to set FONT=/usr/share/fonts/DejaVuSansMono.ttf

[lfs-support] handle power button in LFS

In order to use power button to shutdown or suspend my lfs. I enabled the depreciate /proc/acpi/event in kernel, and install acpid to handle the button event. It works well. But is there any clear way to do that, such as by inittab or udev or kernel callout userspace script (

Re: [lfs-support] handle power button in LFS

2012/5/18 Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com: Andrew Benton wrote: On Fri, 18 May 2012 14:44:00 +0100 xinglp xin...@gmail.com wrote: In order to use power button to shutdown or suspend my lfs. I enabled the depreciate  /proc/acpi/event in kernel, and install acpid to handle the button event

[lfs-support] pstree show wrong info

I've post it to upstream, but no response yet. http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3537508group_id=15273atid=115273 It happend when lots of processes is running, such as compiling somethings. Anyone can reproduce it ? 22.16 is normal init-+-acpid |-agetty |-klogd |-ntpd

Re: [lfs-support] pstree show wrong info

This is just a workaround patch to disable the support of hidepid. When applied the patch and turned on hidepid, pstree not work any more. Not work is better than wrong work, :-) psmisc-22.19-pstree-disable-hidepid.patch Description: Binary data --

[lfs-support] Why system accounts bin, nobody not in locked status?

When I try to login my lfs with user name sshd. I found this message in /var/log/auth.log . Aug 13 15:05:10 lfs_xxx sshd[5674]: User sshd not allowed because account is locked But when I use bin and nobody, I didn't get this message. And there are some different in /etc/shadow .

Re: [lfs-support] live cd

2012/8/13 Robert Cox tw3akur...@yahoo.com: ok , there's a big red notice on the live cd page don't use on 7.0 I see the script and my distro seems to need many changes... could someone be kinnd enough to give me a hint as to what live cd might work? thanks in advance I have my lfs

Re: [lfs-support] Updated 6.3 livecd for LFS 7.2

2012/9/14 William Harrington berzerk...@cox.net: Greetings all, Tonight, I updated the current livecd updated for 7.1 for 7.2. The livecd has an updated e2fsprogs so that users can create and edit ext4 filesystems (e2fsprogs 1.41.13 and later). The 7.2 book is with the livecd and x86 has no

Re: [lfs-support] Booting from USB and root partition uuid

2012/9/20 Tomasz Sekściński tom...@sekscinski.pl: Hi, I copied entire LFS instalation from hdd to USB stick and installed grub into USB. My grub.cfg contains entry: menuentry 'GNU/Linux, with Linux 3.2.6-lfs-7.1' { set root='(/dev/sdb,msdos1)' search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root

Re: [lfs-support] LiveCD to use for building LFS 7.2

2012/12/15 Дмитрий Соколов sokolo...@inbox.ru Hi, Can you help me, what a LiveCD i can use to build LFS 7.2 without installing any packages. -- Thanks, Dmitrij. You can try my lfs(blfs) system, it can do live boot, but it's not a livecd.

Re: [lfs-support] coreutils

2012/12/29 Simon Geard delga...@ihug.co.nz: On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 16:20 +0100, Tobias Gasser wrote: version 8.20 is available since oct 23. lfs-book has a ticket for it: 3215 searching the lists just show the ticket, but no further comments so far. the ticket says 'no announce yet', here it

Re: [lfs-support] eth0 issue NO SUCH DEVICE

2013/3/20 Rubin Saifi rubinsa...@live.com: /run/var/bootlog : no such file or directory /etc/sysconfig/ifconfig.eth0 - well configured /etc/sysconfig/network - well configured ifup eth0 - no device eth0 i am done with the LFS book and the LFSBox is up and running but before the root login

[lfs-support] Binutils-2.23.2 - Pass 1 build error.

log is ../../../binutils-2.23.2/bfd/doc/bfd.texinfo:325: unknown command `colophon' ../../../binutils-2.23.2/bfd/doc/bfd.texinfo:336: unknown command `cygnus' -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above

Re: [lfs-support] Can not find device eth0

2013/5/8 Niels Terp nielst...@comhem.se Hi there, I have build LFS several times now, and I thought I would give the latest kernel 3.9 a try. The installation boots without problems, but in the end of the boot it can not find my NIC. Error message: Adding IPv4 address 192.168.0.100 to

Re: [lfs-support] Can not find device eth0

2013/5/8 Niels Terp nielst...@comhem.se The installation boots without problems, but in the end of the boot it can not find my NIC. Niels It's name was changed, use 'ls /sys/class/net' to detect it's new name. ** ** -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ:

Re: [lfs-support] Migrate bc to lfs?

2013/7/17 loki l...@pancevo.rs ** Heya, following error came up when I compiled the kernel: LD arch/x86/built-in.o CC kernel/fork.o CC kernel/exec_domain.o CC kernel/panic.o CC kernel/printk.o CC kernel/cpu.o CC kernel/exit.o CC

[lfs-support] /etc/init.d/setclock start never run when we start to use eudev

When we use udev (extracted from systemd) , this is a udev rule file for it. cat /etc/udev/rules.d/55-lfs.rules # /etc/udev/rules.d/55-lfs.rules: Rule definitions for LFS. # Core kernel devices # This causes the system clock to be set as soon as /dev/rtc becomes available. SUBSYSTEM==rtc,

[lfs-support] udev-lfs-20140305.tar.bz2 not found.

http://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/sources/other/udev-lfs-20140305.tar.bz2 att -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

[lfs-support] how about auto create udev-lfs-xxx.tar.bz2 automatically

in lfs-book, do the following job: local udevlfs=$(grep udev-lfs-version packages.ent); udevlfs=${udevlfs#*\}; udevlfs=${udevlfs%\*} local udevlfsver=${udevlfs##*-} sed -i s/VERSION=.*/VERSION=${udevlfsver}/ udev-lfs/Makefile.lfs mv udev-lfs ${udevlfs} tar -Scaf ${udevlfs}.tar.bz2 ${udevlfs}

[lfs-support] If only use systemd, which packages can be skipped in chapter06

sysvinit, sysklogd, something else? -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

[lfs-support] missing coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault-1.patch

http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/lfs/development/coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault-1.patch not found. There's only svn://svn.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/trunk/coreutils/coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault.patch -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ:

Re: [lfs-support] missing coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault-1.patch

2014-04-23 11:39 GMT+08:00 Armin K. kre...@email.com: On 04/23/2014 05:15 AM, xinglp wrote: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/lfs/development/coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault-1.patch not found. There's only svn://svn.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/trunk/coreutils/coreutils-8.22-shuf

Re: [lfs-support] missing coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault-1.patch

2014-04-23 13:55 GMT+08:00 Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com: xinglp wrote: 2014-04-23 11:39 GMT+08:00 Armin K. kre...@email.com: On 04/23/2014 05:15 AM, xinglp wrote: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/lfs/development/coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault-1.patch not found. There's only svn

Re: [lfs-support] missing systemd out

2014-04-23 17:26 GMT+08:00 TheOldFellow theoldfel...@gmail.com: Am I right in thinking that ACL, ATTR are not needed if systemd is being avoided? What else has had to be added so that systemd compiles? I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have better alternatives. Richard. Viceversa,

Re: [lfs-support] missing systemd out

2014-04-23 17:26 GMT+08:00 TheOldFellow theoldfel...@gmail.com: Am I right in thinking that ACL, ATTR are not needed if systemd is being avoided? What else has had to be added so that systemd compiles? I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have better alternatives. Richard. Viceversa,

Re: [lfs-support] missing systemd out

sorry for typo. :-) -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page