Re: [lfs-support] Host system requiremens

2018-03-16 Thread Thomas Trepl
Am Mittwoch, den 14.03.2018, 10:34 -0400 schrieb Nathan Hartman:
> On Mar 13, 2018, at 3:12 PM, Paul Rogers 
> wrote:
> 
> > > Hazel, a little late in replying, I know, but I agree, it is
> > > annoying to
> > > have to install two versions of Python.  Of course, the Python
> > > Community
> > > would say that there is only one version of Python now and that
> > > is Python 3.
> > 
> > I'm on Hazel's side.  I like lightweight systems.  And although I
> > do recognize there may come a time to break backward compatibility,
> > I still wish they'd provide a P2->P3 translator.
> 
> I've heard there is one but that it cannot translate all code with
> perfect accuracy.
> 
> I think many projects like to keep their Python 2 code because it
> works, changing it may only introduce "growing pains," and the
> perception is that the hassle outweighs the annoyance of installing
> two Python versions or the benefit of moving forward.

Not only because it just works - there might be projects also available
on other platforms (other than Linux on x86) where P2 is still
standard. So they cannot easily switch to P3 (and drop P2 support).

But yes, having two Pythons on the machine is not that cool...

--
Thomas
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style


Re: [lfs-support] Host system requiremens

2018-03-14 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Mar 13, 2018, at 3:12 PM, Paul Rogers  wrote:

>> Hazel, a little late in replying, I know, but I agree, it is annoying to
>> have to install two versions of Python.  Of course, the Python Community
>> would say that there is only one version of Python now and that is Python 3.
> 
> I'm on Hazel's side.  I like lightweight systems.  And although I do 
> recognize there may come a time to break backward compatibility, I still wish 
> they'd provide a P2->P3 translator.

I've heard there is one but that it cannot translate all code with perfect 
accuracy.

I think many projects like to keep their Python 2 code because it works, 
changing it may only introduce "growing pains," and the perception is that the 
hassle outweighs the annoyance of installing two Python versions or the benefit 
of moving forward.


-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style


Re: [lfs-support] Host system requiremens

2018-03-14 Thread Richard Melville
On 13 March 2018 at 19:12, Paul Rogers  wrote:

> > Hazel, a little late in replying, I know, but I agree, it is annoying to
> > have to install two versions of Python.  Of course, the Python Community
> > would say that there is only one version of Python now and that is
> Python 3.
>
> I'm on Hazel's side.  I like lightweight systems.  And although I do
> recognize there may come a time to break backward compatibility, I still
> wish they'd provide a P2->P3 translator.
>

There is translation available; see these links:-

http://www.pythonconverter.com/
https://docs.python.org/3.0/library/2to3.html

However, the translation is for converting chunks of code from one version
to the other.  Expecting to run a translator on the fly must be close to
impossible, especially where the Python code is linked to C code, which is
probably true for most packages.  It might be possible to convert Python 2
to Python 3 manually on a package by package basis, but it would be a
painstaking business.  Let us know how you get on :-)

Richard
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style


Re: [lfs-support] Host system requiremens

2018-03-13 Thread Paul Rogers
> Hazel, a little late in replying, I know, but I agree, it is annoying to
> have to install two versions of Python.  Of course, the Python Community
> would say that there is only one version of Python now and that is Python 3.

I'm on Hazel's side.  I like lightweight systems.  And although I do recognize 
there may come a time to break backward compatibility, I still wish they'd 
provide a P2->P3 translator.

-- 
Paul Rogers
paulgrog...@fastmail.fm
Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates."
(I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-)
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style


Re: [lfs-support] Host system requiremens

2018-03-12 Thread Bruce Dubbs

On 03/12/2018 03:40 PM, Pol Vangheluwe wrote:

The list of host system requirements in development/LFS-BOOK-SVN-20180303 looks 
a bit outdated
when comparing with the requirements in the INSTALL file of glibc-2.27

Package Bookglibc-2.27
=   =   =
gcc 4.7 4.9
binutils2.172.25
bison   2.3 2.7


Thank you.  I have created a ticket so we do not forget:

http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/4239#ticket

  -- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style