On 2014-02-08 21:24:00 -0500, Justin Ruggles wrote:
On 02/08/2014 09:19 PM, John Stebbins wrote:
AVFrame.sample_rate is set in ff_get_buffer, but aacdec calls
ff_get_buffer before the samplerate is known. So it needs to be
set again before returning the frame.
---
libavcodec/aacdec.c |
AVFrame.sample_rate is set in ff_get_buffer, but aacdec calls
ff_get_buffer before the samplerate is known. So it needs to be
set again before returning the frame.
---
libavcodec/aacdec.c | 11 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavcodec/aacdec.c
On 02/08/2014 09:19 PM, John Stebbins wrote:
AVFrame.sample_rate is set in ff_get_buffer, but aacdec calls
ff_get_buffer before the samplerate is known. So it needs to be
set again before returning the frame.
---
libavcodec/aacdec.c | 11 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4
On 05 Feb 2014, at 19:44, John Stebbins stebb...@jetheaddev.com wrote:
On further examination, I see that the latm code path also parses sample_rate
before starting decoding. So the above
comment about latm is incorrect. But we still can't move initialization of
sample_rate earlier because
On 02/04/2014 04:38 AM, Tim Walker wrote:
On 03 Feb 2014, at 00:24, John Stebbins stebb...@jetheaddev.com wrote:
This does make a functional difference. I looked for the fallback code you
mention. It looks like it is in
ff_get_buffer()? In aacdec, ff_get_buffer is called before
On 02/05/2014 09:40 AM, John Stebbins wrote:
On 02/04/2014 04:38 AM, Tim Walker wrote:
On 03 Feb 2014, at 00:24, John Stebbins stebb...@jetheaddev.com wrote:
This does make a functional difference. I looked for the fallback code you
mention. It looks like it is in
ff_get_buffer()? In
On 03 Feb 2014, at 00:24, John Stebbins stebb...@jetheaddev.com wrote:
This does make a functional difference. I looked for the fallback code you
mention. It looks like it is in
ff_get_buffer()? In aacdec, ff_get_buffer is called before
avctx-sample_rate has been set for the first time.
---
libavcodec/aacdec.c | 11 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavcodec/aacdec.c b/libavcodec/aacdec.c
index 70fbb53..a365209 100644
--- a/libavcodec/aacdec.c
+++ b/libavcodec/aacdec.c
@@ -2753,6 +2753,7 @@ static int aac_decode_er_frame(AVCodecContext
On 02 Feb 2014, at 17:39, John Stebbins stebb...@jetheaddev.com wrote:
---
libavcodec/aacdec.c | 11 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Did I really miss this? I was sure I had tested some AAC sources when switching
to those AVFrame fields.
Tim
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Tim Walker tdskywal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02 Feb 2014, at 17:39, John Stebbins stebb...@jetheaddev.com wrote:
---
libavcodec/aacdec.c | 11 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Did I really miss this? I was sure I had tested some AAC
On 02/02/2014 02:13 PM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Tim Walker tdskywal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02 Feb 2014, at 17:39, John Stebbins stebb...@jetheaddev.com wrote:
---
libavcodec/aacdec.c | 11 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Did I
On 02/02/2014 03:24 PM, John Stebbins wrote:
On 02/02/2014 02:13 PM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Tim Walker tdskywal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02 Feb 2014, at 17:39, John Stebbins stebb...@jetheaddev.com wrote:
---
libavcodec/aacdec.c | 11 +++
1 file
On Monday, February 3, 2014, John Stebbins stebb...@jetheaddev.com wrote:
On 02/02/2014 02:13 PM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Tim Walker
tdskywal...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
On 02 Feb 2014, at 17:39, John Stebbins
stebb...@jetheaddev.comjavascript:;
13 matches
Mail list logo
