On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 1:30 PM, wm4 wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 11:38:17 -0400
> Vittorio Giovara wrote:
>
>> request_channel_layout is a decoder option and it makes no sense
>> to have it in a parser.
>
> Both patches LGTM if decoder downmix on its own still works.
Looks like so, I asked a co
On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 11:38:17 -0400
Vittorio Giovara wrote:
> request_channel_layout is a decoder option and it makes no sense
> to have it in a parser.
Both patches LGTM if decoder downmix on its own still works.
___
libav-devel mailing list
libav-deve
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 11:38:17AM -0400, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
> request_channel_layout is a decoder option and it makes no sense
> to have it in a parser.
>
> This feature was needed in the past when the decoder was allowed
> to reuse the avctx from the demuxer. Nowadays the decoder receives
>
request_channel_layout is a decoder option and it makes no sense
to have it in a parser.
This feature was needed in the past when the decoder was allowed
to reuse the avctx from the demuxer. Nowadays the decoder receives
only the parameters from it, already containing the real channel
layout (and