On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 03:38:38PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote :
The SFLC lawyer said the libfdk-aac license looked (l)gpl-incompatible
to him.
Well, I am sad, but not surprised.
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf
http://www.jbkempf.com/ - +33 672 704 734
Sent from my Electronic Device
On 07/19/2012 10:19 AM, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 03:38:38PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote :
The SFLC lawyer said the libfdk-aac license looked (l)gpl-incompatible
to him.
Well, I am sad, but not surprised.
I'd like to have a better understanding
fdk:
Luca Barbato lu_z...@gentoo.org writes:
On 07/19/2012 10:19 AM, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 03:38:38PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote :
The SFLC lawyer said the libfdk-aac license looked (l)gpl-incompatible
to him.
Well, I am sad, but not surprised.
I'd like to have
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Måns Rullgård m...@mansr.com wrote:
Luca Barbato lu_z...@gentoo.org writes:
On 07/19/2012 10:19 AM, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 03:38:38PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote :
The SFLC lawyer said the libfdk-aac license looked
On 7/18/12 7:57 AM, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
Did any of us ask FLSC, FSFE or Chris?
I did not, who did/would do?
lu
___
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 07:57:07AM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 02:43:13AM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote :
On 07/17/2012 08:13 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
---
Somehow I missed this during review - of course the prudent choice is
not to assume compatibility until
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 09:49:24AM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote :
Derek mailed the SFLC and got a negative response.
Negative answer? What do you mean?
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf
http://www.jbkempf.com/ - +33 672 704 734
Sent from my Electronic Device
___
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:29:46AM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 09:49:24AM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote :
Derek mailed the SFLC and got a negative response.
Negative answer? What do you mean?
The SFLC lawyer said the libfdk-aac license looked (l)gpl-incompatible
---
Somehow I missed this during review - of course the prudent choice is
not to assume compatibility until it has been confirmed. In general
compatibility between copyleft-style licenses is tricky...
configure |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure
On 07/17/2012 02:13 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
---
Somehow I missed this during review - of course the prudent choice is
not to assume compatibility until it has been confirmed. In general
compatibility between copyleft-style licenses is tricky...
configure |1 +
1 files changed, 1
On 07/17/2012 08:13 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
---
Somehow I missed this during review - of course the prudent choice is
not to assume compatibility until it has been confirmed. In general
compatibility between copyleft-style licenses is tricky...
We discussed that before the commit, the short
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 02:43:13AM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote :
On 07/17/2012 08:13 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
---
Somehow I missed this during review - of course the prudent choice is
not to assume compatibility until it has been confirmed. In general
compatibility between copyleft-style
12 matches
Mail list logo
