On 2013/10/24 1:04, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> Hi Weng,
>
> Would something similar to the attached patch help you? This of course
> is completely untested (it seems to build).
>
> Ideally the list I have made would be setup better, and extensible,
> and we just track the dependencies there for specif
- Original Message -
> From: "Peter Schiffer"
> To: libcg-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 3:09:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [Libcg-devel] [PATCH 6/6] be more verbose by default
>
> On 10/17/2013 02:33 PM, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> >> I have to
> I feel very nervous with this one. Let's say the setup is for cpu,
> with nested groups such a and a/b. What if something fails to be set
> in a, or a/b which then causes problems with containment/other groups.
> You would be asking for the user to check whether cgconfigparser
> actually succeede
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Stanislav Fomichev
wrote:
>> I feel very nervous with this one. Let's say the setup is for cpu,
>> with nested groups such a and a/b. What if something fails to be set
>> in a, or a/b which then causes problems with containment/other groups.
>> You would be asking
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Weng Meiling
wrote:
> On 2013/10/24 1:04, Dhaval Giani wrote:
>> Hi Weng,
>>
>> Would something similar to the attached patch help you? This of course
>> is completely untested (it seems to build).
>>
>> Ideally the list I have made would be setup better, and exten
On 2013/10/24 21:04, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Weng Meiling
> wrote:
>> On 2013/10/24 1:04, Dhaval Giani wrote:
>>> Hi Weng,
>>>
>>> Would something similar to the attached patch help you? This of course
>>> is completely untested (it seems to build).
>>>
>>> Ideally t
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Weng Meiling
wrote:
> On 2013/10/24 21:04, Dhaval Giani wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Weng Meiling
>> wrote:
>>> On 2013/10/24 1:04, Dhaval Giani wrote:
Hi Weng,
Would something similar to the attached patch help you? This of course
>>