On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 2:50 AM, Greg g...@kinostudios.com wrote:
Also, you convince me how to keep providing high quality software and
support while simultaneously making Espionage completely free and open
source and I will do it in a flash.
Call up Red Hat and ask them about how they manage
Hi,
I've been meaning to point you to the relaunched Tactical Tech website
*Me and My Shadow* for a while: https://www.myshadow.org/
It's a website that aims to help users understand about the traces they
leave online, or rather, the traces about them that can be found online
no matter whether
https://tacticaltech.org/gender-tech-institute
Tactical Tech, in collaboration with the Association for Progressive
Communications (APC), are organising a *7-day event* for up to 50 women
and trans people to learn tools and techniques for increasing their
understanding and practice in digital
Dear Natanael,
Call up Red Hat and ask them about how they manage their open source
Linux distribution.
Oh, I am very familiar with the Red Hat model, and I respect it greatly, and am
in fact pursuing something similar.
Red Hat works because it is complicated, technical infrastructure
On 10/03/2014 12:57 PM, Greg wrote:
Dear Natanael,
Call up Red Hat and ask them about how they manage their open source
Linux distribution.
Oh, I am very familiar with the Red Hat model, and I respect it
greatly, and am in fact pursuing something similar.
Red Hat works because it is
Hi Greg. The burden of proof is on Espionage to convince people that
it is safe. I can't trust it based on marketing claims alone.
There is not a sufficiently detailed design document on the website,
much less a battle-tested, peer-reviewed design. I don't see any
reference to independent
On Oct 3, 2014, at 12:04 PM, Steve Weis stevew...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Greg. The burden of proof is on Espionage to convince people that
it is safe. I can't trust it based on marketing claims alone.
There is not a sufficiently detailed design document on the website,
much less a
Dear Jonathan,
On Oct 3, 2014, at 11:41 AM, Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com wrote:
You could also do a 3-clause BSD license for the library (i.e., business
logic), then separate out the GUI part and put whatever license you want on
the bundle. You could even do deterministic builds of
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 05:50:08PM -0700, Greg wrote:
K, thanks for the read (I read it but nothing there seems to apply,
perhaps some of its points will be addressed below).
I'm sorry that you feel that way; I included that link because I think
the entire message applies, particularly this
Hi Rich, Your footnote #1 is dubious at best. The cost of aiming peoples
eyes at bugs is _not_ $0. Until it is, the free software community has a
problem with too few resources chasing too many bugs. Sitting my Debian box
next to an XP box that's running Flash certainly doesn't change
Dear Rich,
I echo Jonathan's reply to your email.
At the same time, I do feel a certain empathy and understanding of the feeling
behind your words. If there was anything in your email that I came closest to
agreeing with, it would be this:
You can't have the former without the latter: it's
Well, to be completely honest I wouldn't use security software with a
proprietary GUI myself. But I'm not most people, and it would be better for
your business logic to be open source than for the whole thing to be subject to
the terms you describe.
-Jonathan
On Friday, October 3, 2014
12 matches
Mail list logo
