Re: [Libevent-users] bug in evhttp_write_buffer/weird event_set semantics?

2007-11-03 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 05:40:50PM -0700, Niels Provos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think the documentation is very clear on this: I read that part, but the documentation doesn't mention anything about wether one can pass in uninitalised memory (as I explained in my mail). Did you read it? The

Re: [Libevent-users] bug in evhttp_write_buffer/weird event_set semantics?

2007-11-03 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 01:57:31AM +0100, Marc Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I find your somewhat discourteous insinuation of bugs distracting. 1. I reported a number of bugs in libevent so far. I am not insinuating, but reporting bugs, to improve libevent. I wanted to mention that I

Re: [Libevent-users] bug in evhttp_write_buffer/weird event_set semantics?

2007-11-03 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 02:00:15AM +0100, Marc Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 01:57:31AM +0100, Marc Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I find your somewhat discourteous insinuation of bugs distracting. 1. I reported a number of bugs in libevent so far. I am not