Re: [Libguestfs] [p2v PATCH v2 0/6] restrict vCPU topology to (a) fully populated physical, or (b) 1 * N * 1

On 09/09/22 15:04, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 02:53:11PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> On 09/09/22 13:51, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>> On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 11:10:47AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: On 09/08/22 18:27, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > Bugzilla:

Re: [Libguestfs] [p2v PATCH v2 0/6] restrict vCPU topology to (a) fully populated physical, or (b) 1 * N * 1

On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 02:53:11PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 09/09/22 13:51, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 11:10:47AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > >> On 09/08/22 18:27, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > >>> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1590721 > >>> v1:

Re: [Libguestfs] [p2v PATCH v2 0/6] restrict vCPU topology to (a) fully populated physical, or (b) 1 * N * 1

On 09/09/22 13:51, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 11:10:47AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> On 09/08/22 18:27, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >>> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1590721 >>> v1: >>>

Re: [Libguestfs] [p2v PATCH v2 0/6] restrict vCPU topology to (a) fully populated physical, or (b) 1 * N * 1

On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 11:10:47AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 09/08/22 18:27, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1590721 > > v1: > > https://listman.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2022-September/029806.html > > > > Please see the Notes

Re: [Libguestfs] [p2v PATCH v2 0/6] restrict vCPU topology to (a) fully populated physical, or (b) 1 * N * 1

On 09/08/22 18:27, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1590721 > v1: > https://listman.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2022-September/029806.html > > Please see the Notes section on each patch for the updates in this > version (addressing v1