On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Benjamin Kirk wrote:
>>> It's already too late to save the FE classes, but please, the
>>> DofObjects are innocent; there's no need to kill again!
>>
>> I'm sorry Roy but I agree with Ben,
No need to apologize; you're disagreeing with me politely about a
technical question.
>> It's already too late to save the FE classes, but please, the
>> DofObjects are innocent; there's no need to kill again!
>>
>
> I'm sorry Roy but I agree with Ben,
> I think that the FE classes help making the difference taking libMesh
> one step ahead.
> But, I have to say that I love templat
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Benjamin Kirk wrote:
> I've got one more easy fix which helps a lot... Combine the _n_vars and
> _n_comp char vectors, using _n_comp[s][0] to hold the number of variables in
> system s. Then _n_comp[s][1] ... _n_comp[s][NV] is the actual number of
> components for each varia
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Benjamin Kirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Just eliminating that unnecessary, incomplete copy reduced the memory
> >>> usage
> >>> to 980MB, which I consider a huge savings. So needless to say we will
> not
> >>> copy the dof objects when they do not con
>>> Just eliminating that unnecessary, incomplete copy reduced the memory usage
>>> to 980MB, which I consider a huge savings. So needless to say we will not
>>> copy the dof objects when they do not contain complete information.
>>
>> Wow! I'd consider that a big savings too.
>
> I'll third
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, John Peterson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Benjamin Kirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Just eliminating that unnecessary, incomplete copy reduced the memory usage
>> to 980MB, which I consider a huge savings. So needless to say we will not
>> copy the dof obje
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Benjamin Kirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A question recently came up on the user's list regarding the old_dof_object.
> Specifically, is it OK to clear it after system projection.
>
> I couldn't think of a reason why not, but I also figured it had a pretty
> sm
A question recently came up on the user's list regarding the old_dof_object.
Specifically, is it OK to clear it after system projection.
I couldn't think of a reason why not, but I also figured it had a pretty
small memory footprint. Not so, especially on 64-bit machines.
I've got a ~1 million e
