I (or someone in my group) will make it happen.
Derek
On Feb 18, 2009, at 11:58 AM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG) wrote:
> Succinct and dead-on. I concur. ;-)
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Roy Stogner
> To: Derek Gaston
> Cc: [email protected] >
> Sent: Wed Feb 18
Succinct and dead-on. I concur. ;-)
- Original Message -
From: Roy Stogner
To: Derek Gaston
Cc: [email protected]
Sent: Wed Feb 18 12:48:04 2009
Subject: Re: [Libmesh-devel] libtool
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Derek Gaston wrote:
> In all of our makefiles we've hardcod
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Derek Gaston wrote:
> In all of our makefiles we've hardcoded a libtool call for Darwin
> (OSX). Unfortunately, when using IPO optimization with the Intel
> compiler you need to call "xilibtool" for OSX...
>
> So... we have a couple of options. We could read a $LIBTOOL
> e
In all of our makefiles we've hardcoded a libtool call for Darwin
(OSX). Unfortunately, when using IPO optimization with the Intel
compiler you need to call "xilibtool" for OSX...
So... we have a couple of options. We could read a $LIBTOOL
environment variable in the makefiles. We could d
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Tim Kroeger wrote:
> What's the current state about the ghosted vectors?
They appear to be working for stationary problems, but there's
definitely a bug which corrupts transient results - possibly in the
System::project_vector code, possibly in the
enforce_constraints_exactl
Dear Roy,
What's the current state about the ghosted vectors? Are you waiting
for some input from me, or did you just not have time in the
meanwhile?
Best Regards,
Tim
--
Dr. Tim Kroeger
[email protected] +49-421-218-7710
[email protected]
