On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Lorenzo Botti wrote:
> Il giorno 30/mar/2010, alle ore 20.33, Roy Stogner ha scritto:
>
>> This means that the current project_vector() code is definitely buggy
>> for the hp case, and it's possible that the constraint generation code
>> (which uses the same p-hierarchic assu
Il giorno 30/mar/2010, alle ore 20.33, Roy Stogner ha scritto:
>
> This means that the current project_vector() code is definitely buggy
> for the hp case, and it's possible that the constraint generation code
> (which uses the same p-hierarchic assumption) has the same problem.
> ---
> Roy-
Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
> Thanks. 3.1 was released 4 days ago, so I expect we will have support for it
> in about a week or so.
>
> -Ben
>
>
>
Thanks for your great FEA package, so that I can survive in the my
group, and I plan to use libmesh to do my thesis, it is pretty powerful
Thanks. 3.1 was released 4 days ago, so I expect we will have support for it
in about a week or so.
-Ben
- Original Message -
From: Liang
To: libmesh-devel
Sent: Tue Mar 30 15:28:04 2010
Subject: [Libmesh-devel] PETSc v3.1 doesn't cooperate libmesh 0.6.4 well
Hi Developers and Users
Hi Developers and Users,
I did install the libmesh 0.6.4 on a new computer today, it conflicts
with the lastest PETSc v3.1. The libmesh can't find the
/bmake/linux-gnu-c-debug/package. When I downgrade the PESTs to the
v.3.0. the installation goes smoothly. So the PETSc v3.0 will be a good
cho
On Mar 30, 2010, at 12:28 PM, Derek Gaston wrote:
> Just for catloguing the problem... can you give a small description? Maybe
> someone else can fix it...
Bah! If we wanted to keep track of our feline friends... I expect we could do
it without having a log of all of their activities.
However
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Derek Gaston wrote:
On Mar 30, 2010, at 12:09 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
Yeah, and I'm starting to wonder if I did it right. While I was
preparing this patch I think I noticed a bug that would kill the
convergence rates for hp refinement on C0 elements in 2D
On Mar 30, 2010, at 12:09 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
> Yeah, and I'm starting to wonder if I did it right. While I was
> preparing this patch I think I noticed a bug that would kill the
> convergence rates for hp refinement on C0 elements in 2D/3D - a
> situation in which I never did get exponential
