Hi Paul,
I'm at a conference so I don't have time to switch the RB examples now,
so if you go ahead that'd be great.
David
On 06/05/2013 11:22 AM, Paul T. Bauman wrote:
Mind waiting 24 hours? I wanted to finish off the work I'd started a
long time ago on "privatizing" FEMSystem stuff for t
On Wed, 5 Jun 2013, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
> anyone have heartache if I package up 0.9.2-rc1, complete with PETSc
> 3.4 support and preliminary blocked matrix support?
If we're going to continue having much more frequent releases then we
ought to script up the whole tag/branch/upload
On Jun 5, 2013, at 10:22 AM, "Paul T. Bauman" wrote:
> Mind waiting 24 hours?
Not at all. I'm actually overwhelmed with stuff ATM so you won't be holding me
up.
--
How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departmen
On Wed, 5 Jun 2013, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
> anyone have heartache if I package up 0.9.2-rc1, complete with PETSc
> 3.4 support and preliminary blocked matrix support?
We should be set to go for -rc1 whenever Paul's ready. There's a
couple bugfixes for non-uint index types that I wan
Mind waiting 24 hours? I wanted to finish off the work I'd started a long
time ago on "privatizing" FEMSystem stuff for this release (which will
break backward compatibility). A couple of hours work tonight should be
able to finish it off and I can put in a pull request.
David Knezivic, I'll try a
On Jun 5, 2013, at 10:07 AM, Roy Stogner wrote:
> I actually fixed that about a month ago, so
> if you want to try the latest libMesh from git (which is currently in
> quite stable shape) it should work with your old Makefiles.
Roy just mentioned this on the user list. I completely agree - anyo
I have a question about the whole mesh bootstrap procedure as I track down
an issue that Derek and I bumped into when tiling and stitching meshes a
few weeks back.
We are starting to grow utilities to programmatically build meshes for our
simulations on the fly out of several primitives like build
