Re: [Libmesh-devel] Periodic BCs patch

2012-08-21 Thread Roy Stogner
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, John Peterson wrote: > Note that the periodicity of v is set up with two sets of periodic BCs > (one for the left and one for the right half of the domain) so it > could have to do with a pair of periodic boundaries meeting at a > point? That's a tricky case, but one I speci

Re: [Libmesh-devel] Periodic BCs patch

2012-08-21 Thread Roy Stogner
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, John Peterson wrote: > So there are small differences in several of the tests which I am > investigating One case in which small differences would be expected: if you have anything where the initial conditions are not periodic-consistent, then it's possible that the way in w

Re: [Libmesh-devel] Periodic BCs patch

2012-08-21 Thread John Peterson
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:52 AM, John Peterson wrote: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:11 PM, John Peterson > wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 4:46 PM, John Peterson >> wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Roy Stogner >>> wrote: This is against the SVN head. It seems to work fine

[Libmesh-devel] Periodic BCs patch

2012-08-20 Thread Roy Stogner
This is against the SVN head. It seems to work fine on the all-too-few tests I've run, but does it pass the INL test suite too? --- RoyIndex: src/fe/fe_base.C === --- src/fe/fe_base.C (revision 5966) +++ src/fe/fe_base.C (working co