On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
> On Wed, 8 May 2013, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
>
>> The full "license" is listed below. Thoughts on what this means for us?
>>
>> (Note I've given up on making these decisions…)
>
>
> This is some custom one-off license, which means I'
On May 8, 2013, at 10:44 AM, Roy Stogner wrote:
> That said: it looks like a basic BSD-type license with no problems.
> We keep the license file and a changelog file in contrib/qhull and
> we're good. It's in Debian, too, so if there are any "gotchas" that
> I'm missing, better license-lawyers
On Wed, 8 May 2013, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
The full "license" is listed below. Thoughts on what this means for us?
(Note I've given up on making these decisions…)
This is some custom one-off license, which means I've spent about one
one-thousandth as much time reading it as I hav
Sounds liberal enough to me - there's no requirement for redistributing
libMesh with any application. Probably wouldn't hurt to email the author
about your intention to be sure.
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) <
[email protected]> wrote:
> OK, Once more unto th
OK, Once more unto the breach, dear friends…
To complement (replace?) tetgen for 3D convex hulls, I'm looking into adding
qhull as an optional, contributed package.
The full "license" is listed below. Thoughts on what this means for us?
(Note I've given up on making these decisions…)
-Ben
