On Thu, 1 Dec 2011, David Knezevic wrote:
> I'll just avoid the non-unique naming for now. So you think prepending the
> directory name would be satisfactory:
>
> examples/adjoints/adjoints_ex01
> examples/reduced_basis/reduced_basis_ex01
>
> ?
Yeah; but note that the Makefiles and contrib scri
On 12/01/2011 06:00 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2011, David Knezevic wrote:
>
>> As a first cut, I've moved ex23, ex30 and ex31 into a new
>> examples/reduced_basis/ directory. If everyone's happy with how this
>> looks,
>
> I found minor problems in Makefiles and create_example_d
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011, David Knezevic wrote:
> As a first cut, I've moved ex23, ex30 and ex31 into a new
> examples/reduced_basis/ directory. If everyone's happy with how this looks,
I found minor problems in Makefiles and create_example_docs.sh; I've
fixed them.
There's still a major problem i
Hey all,
I propose that we put ex26 and ex27, in examples/adjoints
We will be adding more adjoint functionality to libMesh in the future
and might be good to have all of those examples in one directory.
One possible issue with the directory organization will be that some
examples will
As a first cut, I've moved ex23, ex30 and ex31 into a new
examples/reduced_basis/ directory. If everyone's happy with how this
looks, I can reorganize the other examples too.
But I think some thought needs to go into how to reorganize the
examples. Further to Derek's suggestion, I'd suggest som
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
> I definitely like the idea of reorganizing
Likewise.
> and maybe even deprecating some of the examples - MeshData is pretty
> well deprecated, right?
The API's not deprecated, but it's highly discouraged to say the
least. I'd be happy
I definitely like the idea of reorganizing and maybe even deprecating some of
the examples - MeshData is pretty well deprecated, right?
On Oct 25, 2011, at 8:55 PM, "John Peterson" wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 7:50 PM, David Knezevic
> wrote:
>> On 10/25/2011 09:49 PM, Derek Gaston wrote
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 7:50 PM, David Knezevic
wrote:
> On 10/25/2011 09:49 PM, Derek Gaston wrote:
>> What about changing the way we store examples altogether? Maybe we should
>> do something like:
>>
>> examples/beginning/ex01
>> examples/adaptivity/ex01
>> examples/transient/ex01
>> examples
On 10/25/2011 09:49 PM, Derek Gaston wrote:
> What about changing the way we store examples altogether? Maybe we should do
> something like:
>
> examples/beginning/ex01
> examples/adaptivity/ex01
> examples/transient/ex01
> examples/femsystem/ex01
> examples/infinite_elements/ex01
> examples/redu
What about changing the way we store examples altogether? Maybe we should do
something like:
examples/beginning/ex01
examples/adaptivity/ex01
examples/transient/ex01
examples/femsystem/ex01
examples/infinite_elements/ex01
examples/reduced_basis/ex01
etc….
The example numbers are starting to ge
On 10/25/2011 09:41 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, David Knezevic wrote:
>
>> There's a few more people working on rbOOmit these days, so I'd like to
>> add a couple of new Reduced Basis examples to libMesh, if everyone's OK
>> with that?
>
> Almost certainly. What would be new in
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, David Knezevic wrote:
> There's a few more people working on rbOOmit these days, so I'd like to
> add a couple of new Reduced Basis examples to libMesh, if everyone's OK
> with that?
Almost certainly. What would be new in the new examples?
> Would renumbering examples be a
There's a few more people working on rbOOmit these days, so I'd like to
add a couple of new Reduced Basis examples to libMesh, if everyone's OK
with that?
Would renumbering examples be an option, e.g. it'd be kinda weird if the
Reduced Basis examples are ex23, ex30 and ex31 (or something)?
Dav
13 matches
Mail list logo
