Re: [Libmesh-devel] Candidate for systems_of_equations_ex7: nonlinear elasticity

2014-12-09 Thread David Knezevic
OK, done. On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 5:01 PM, John Peterson wrote: > On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:50 PM, David Knezevic > wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 5:10 PM, David Knezevic < > david.kneze...@akselos.com> > > wrote: > > > > I believe there was an error in the formulation I was using yesterday

Re: [Libmesh-devel] Candidate for systems_of_equations_ex7: nonlinear elasticity

2014-12-09 Thread John Peterson
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:50 PM, David Knezevic wrote: > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 5:10 PM, David Knezevic > wrote: > > I believe there was an error in the formulation I was using yesterday (I had > an extra det(F) which wasn't supposed to be there). I've updated the code on > my fork, and it looks l

Re: [Libmesh-devel] Candidate for systems_of_equations_ex7: nonlinear elasticity

2014-12-09 Thread David Knezevic
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 5:10 PM, David Knezevic wrote: > > John suggested that I put this code into my fork on github so that it's >> easier for others to view and comment on. I'll take care of that shortly. >> > > > OK, it's up on my fork on github, see here >

Re: [Libmesh-devel] Candidate for systems_of_equations_ex7: nonlinear elasticity

2014-12-08 Thread David Knezevic
> John suggested that I put this code into my fork on github so that it's > easier for others to view and comment on. I'll take care of that shortly. > OK, it's up on my fork on github, see here

Re: [Libmesh-devel] Candidate for systems_of_equations_ex7: nonlinear elasticity

2014-12-08 Thread David Knezevic
Hi Paul, > The code converges and seems to give reasonable results, but I was hoping >> to get a second (or more!) set of eyes on this to check that it's >> reasonable. >> > > I'll try and have a quick look later this week. > Much appreciated, thanks! John suggested that I put this code into

Re: [Libmesh-devel] Candidate for systems_of_equations_ex7: nonlinear elasticity

2014-12-08 Thread Paul T. Bauman
Hi David, On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:46 PM, David Knezevic wrote: > > > The code converges and seems to give reasonable results, but I was hoping > to get a second (or more!) set of eyes on this to check that it's > reasonable. > I'll try and have a quick look later this week. > In particular,