Re: [Libmesh-devel] FENedelecOne

On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Roy Stogner wrote: > > On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Paul T. Bauman wrote: > > The patch can be found here: http://users.ices.utexas.edu/~** >> pbauman/nedelec_one.patch >> >> Comments? OK for trunk? >> > > I'd give ot

Re: [Libmesh-devel] FENedelecOne

On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Paul T. Bauman wrote: > Thanks, that would be my plan. But, at the moment, it's low on the list. I > was just trying to point out the caveats that I were at the front of my > mind. > I knew I was forgetting something... 7. The 2-D case is currently only valid for

Re: [Libmesh-devel] FENedelecOne

On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, John Peterson wrote: > On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Paul T. Bauman wrote: > >> 6. For higher-order tet elements, we'll need a tet14 for the face dofs. > > Interesting. 4 vertex + 6 midedge + 4 midface nodes? Right. We've needed a TET14 for a while; it would let us imple

Re: [Libmesh-devel] FENedelecOne

On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 3:45 PM, John Peterson wrote: > On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Paul T. Bauman wrote: > > > > 5. Just to be clear, the (excellent) report I cite in the code comes from > > the deal.ii website, but I came across it through a Google search. All > the > > code is my own, or c

Re: [Libmesh-devel] FENedelecOne

On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Paul T. Bauman wrote: > The patch can be found here: > http://users.ices.utexas.edu/~pbauman/nedelec_one.patch > > Comments? OK for trunk? I'd give others some time to comment first, but all looks great to me. --- Roy ---

Re: [Libmesh-devel] FENedelecOne

On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Paul T. Bauman wrote: > > 5. Just to be clear, the (excellent) report I cite in the code comes from > the deal.ii website, but I came across it through a Google search. All the > code is my own, or copied from existing libMesh code, and nothing came from > deal.ii.