Dear Roy,
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Roy Stogner wrote:
Currently, ex10 on 2 CPUs dies after the first refinement, when
operator() fails at TransientSystem::old_local_solution.operator()(i),
where i is outside of the local dofs on that processor, because at the
time the _global_to_local_map is empty.
Dear Ben,
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG) wrote:
> I'd still like to ultimately change the PetscVector() to use
> VecCreateGhostWithArray() (or whatever the proper name is). In that
> approach we would allocate our own buffer (preferably in the NumericVector
> base class) and this b
>> However, for efficiency it would be nice for these 2d surface
>> elements to know the 3d element that created them. To make that
>> happen, I have been considering abusing the notion of parent -
>> basically using the -parent pointer to store the (dim+1)-dimensional
>> parent, and then making t
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG) wrote:
>> Reusing the parent pointer scares me.
As long as you're not arguing the point. ;-) Just be careful.
> Not sure about that... Since the orientation of the elements on the
> manifold introduce the notion of 'inside' and 'outside' I think t
This sounds good to me. The converged bool was really a stop-gap. We
didn't have _any_ way to report a converged status at all.
Derek
On Jan 26, 2009, at 1:52 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
> Someone (Derek?) recently added a bool to NonlinearSolver to store the
> status of the last solve. Should w
Hey all,
At some point since we set up the new wiki, LabobOgetr, has registered
an account and posted a bunch of spam. We should probably fix this
ASAP but I can't get to it at the moment.
--
John
--
This SF.net email
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, John Peterson wrote:
> At some point since we set up the new wiki, LabobOgetr, has registered
> an account and posted a bunch of spam. We should probably fix this
> ASAP but I can't get to it at the moment.
"Can't get to it" == "don't have enough time" or
== "have been lock
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, John Peterson wrote:
>
>> At some point since we set up the new wiki, LabobOgetr, has registered
>> an account and posted a bunch of spam. We should probably fix this
>> ASAP but I can't get to it at the moment.
>
> "Ca
