No prob,
it's just that sometime I forget to add the list in the recipients.
Back to the main issue,
when you say that Exodus meshes can be split in Nemesis meshes you
mean that Nemesis can do it?
Il giorno 21/ott/2009, alle ore 22.08, Derek Gaston ha scritto:
> Is it ok if I send my response
On Oct 21, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Lorenzo Botti wrote:
> Thanks for the hints.
> Just a question... It seems that you prefer the Nemesis format
> compared to the native xdr xda, is there any reason for that?
The reason is that Nemesis is a format that other things read /
write... where xdr/a is o
Thanks for the hints.
Just a question... It seems that you prefer the Nemesis format
compared to the native xdr xda, is there any reason for that?
I don't know if I will have time to do it in the near future because
the end of my PhD is approaching very fast.
Anyway I think that parallel IO for
1) In certain circumstances but probably not huge.
2) Yes
3) You can read and write parallel xda/r files although I haven't done
it myself. BUT... it looks like that is only possible when writing the
entire equation system not just the mesh. I don't know if there is a way
around that. M
I'm planning to perform a lot of parallel runs (without AMR) on a big
cluster and I would like to know a couple of details about the parallel mesh
implementation.
1) Is it faster than serial mesh?
2) Does it use less memory per process?
3) Is it possible to read and/or write parallel .xdr/.xda dat
