On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 11:56:07AM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> The FSF changed headquarters a long time ago. Here is a patch to update
> the license headers in libmpeg2 to reflect that change. It also
> includes a similar change for the COPYING file. I just replaced yours
> with the copy in /u
The FSF changed headquarters a long time ago. Here is a patch to update
the license headers in libmpeg2 to reflect that change. It also
includes a similar change for the COPYING file. I just replaced yours
with the copy in /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2 on my Debian system.
Please apply.
Die
Hi Diego,
A nitpick about your patch that updates the FSF address: I noticed that
trunk/src/getopt.{c,h} remain untouched.
But anyway, judging from the log, these two files have been untouched
since their introduction in the libmpeg2 repository on 2001-07-23. Since
then, they have been modified u
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 03:12:15PM +0200, Lionel Debroux wrote:
>
> A nitpick about your patch that updates the FSF address: I noticed that
> trunk/src/getopt.{c,h} remain untouched.
Yes, that was done on purpose, these files are from glibc, not libmpeg2.
> What do people think ?
Your patch is
Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > A nitpick about your patch that updates the FSF address: I
> > noticed that trunk/src/getopt.{c,h} remain untouched.
>
> Yes, that was done on purpose,
Ah, OK.
> these files are from glibc, not libmpeg2.
Indeed, but is there something that prevents the libmpeg2 project fr
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 05:16:50PM +0200, Lionel Debroux wrote:
> Diego Biurrun wrote:
>
> > > A nitpick about your patch that updates the FSF address: I
> > > noticed that trunk/src/getopt.{c,h} remain untouched.
> >
> > Yes, that was done on purpose,
> Ah, OK.
> > these files are from glibc, no
Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > What do you, and others, think about upgrading the getopt files ?
>
> If by upgrading you mean fixing the license header like I just did
> for libmpeg2 then my answer is: I would leave the files untouched
> since they are externally imported files.
Nope, I meant replacing
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 08:57:18PM +0200, Lionel Debroux wrote:
> Nope, I meant replacing getopt.{c,h} with more recent versions that seem
> to have compatibility / portability improvements:
> * getopt.c: libmpeg2 has v1.37 (Sat Feb 12 07:33:25 2000 UTC), upstream
> has v1.57 (Sat Mar 29 20:19:18 2
