Forgot to add the link:
http://www.pitonyak.org/OOME_4_0.odt
On 2/8/19 8:42 AM, LORENZO Vincent wrote:
Hello,
I’m looking for a code example to create a table of contents and fill
it programmatically. I thought find something like an object called
XTableOfContents in the unoil library,
From OOME on my web site, well, part of that section:
Finding and inserting a table of contents (TOC) is easy unless you want
to change the defaults. The following macro checks ThisComponent to see
if the document contains a content index.
REM Find TOC if it exists.
oIndexes =
This does work for me, but, only if I define some global variables in
the defining module. Try setting OptionExplicit at the top of the module
and it will flag all of those undefined variables for you.
Global oGlob
GLobal oListener
Global boFinished
Global url
On 07/06/2015 04:54 PM, Jerry
Calc documents implement the following service:
com.sun.star.sheet.SpreadsheetDocument
Using that with the examples below based on a write document:
'**
'// Count the total number of open componets.
'//
Nicholas,
Can you clarify your request?
Do you simply need a free UML tool, something that allows you to model
UML from within LO, or something to create UML for use by the official
LO project?
Some years back, I found a UML to a project that directed that open
source tools be used. If I
It seems to be an issue where one's view point is attacked with
religious zeal. The fact that people feel so strongly on both sides is
an indicator to me that it is nothing more than personal preference.
The posting style used affects the best way to follow the thread. If you
leave
On 09/15/2014 03:38 PM, julien2412 wrote:
Hello,
Following
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=a3ad01dc1e07da21182077bd899094fd73f57714,
should it worth it to replace rtl_math_log1p/rtl_math_expm1 and related by
boost::math::log1p/expm1 ?
Or should we let the code as it is
When I see this, it is usually so that a macro knows when it can close a
document (you cannot close a document that is being used because it is
being actively printed). So, you noticed that the reported states are
very basic
On 01/26/2014 07:35 PM, Chris Sherlock wrote:
Libreoffice takes advantage of STL vectors throughout the codebase. So
just a general question: under what circumstances is it better to use
a for loop than an STL for_each loop?
Are there specific advantages to for_each over a regular loop?
I
On 11/27/2013 07:45 AM, Pavel Laštovička wrote:
Hi all,
is there a way to reformat parts or whole text document e.g. from a
Basic macro? Without inserting / changing a text content to force
formatting.
I am thinking about a macro changing a compatibility option called by
user during document
On 11/15/2013 07:43 AM, Thomas Krumbein wrote:
Every custom macro application with dialogs or forms for user
interfaces is influenced if dialogs/forms using Date/time fields. And
typicly most of them (in my applications about 70%) used those fields.
So all applications will crash using LO
Do we have more information on this library anywhere, or should I just
poke through it to see what is there?
On 10/13/2013 08:00 PM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
Just a notice that as per now, master-towards-4.2 contains
Access2Base, a StarBasic library that offers an easier API to Base
(and
Thanks for looking Eike!
Good to know for sure that it is a bug rather than intended behavior. I
will contact a few others that are not on this list and update them.
On 08/30/2013 03:27 PM, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On Friday, 2013-08-30 01:27:05 -0400, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote
On 08/30/2013 04:53 PM, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On Friday, 2013-08-30 15:50:09 -0400, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
Good to know for sure that it is a bug rather than intended
behavior. I will contact a few others that are not on this list and
update them.
Cause identified, easy fix
Anyone know off hand where I can find the sourcecode to set the the
Formula and FormulaLocal property. Then, how can I see how changed that
code last?
A bug was introduced in 4.1 and I am trying to track the developer
responsible.
So, what is the bug?
Setting the Formula property on a
On 08/29/2013 10:44 PM, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
Anyone know off hand where I can find the sourcecode to set the the
Formula and FormulaLocal property. Then, how can I see how changed
that code last?
A bug was introduced in 4.1 and I am trying to track the developer
responsible.
So
I had a lot of trouble with your little macro and I am not sure if it is
because there are Bugs in LO or something else is happening.
First, I believe that your only stated problem is that you enter
B780) and it comes out as C13. This is because it is relative. In
other words, what you
On 08/14/2013 11:05 AM, Joeran Beel wrote:
Hello,
we are planning to develop an open-source add-on for LibreOffice to
manage citations based on BibTeX and the citation style language
http://citationstyles.org/. If someone of you is interested in helping
us with the development (for money,
it later... ugg.
mike
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 12:00 AM, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
and...@pitonyak.org mailto:and...@pitonyak.org wrote:
I remember looking at redlines way back in the dark recesses
of time, so I loaded up AndrewMacro.odt
The best I saw
I remember looking at redlines way back in the dark recesses of time, so
I loaded up AndrewMacro.odt
The best I saw there was the ability to enumerate text sections to find
Redline text portion sections.
If I had to determine if the cursor was currently in a redline section,
my first guess
The usual way of for obtaining help is outlined here:
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/
You do not mention exactly what type of support that you require...
but I don't think that in general you can obtain a support contract
from a "community" of
Does not really answer your question, but:
MsgBox PageCount = ThisComponent.CurrentController.PageCount
CHR$(10) _
LineCount = ThisComponent.CurrentController.LineCount
CHR$(10) _
Current Page = ThisComponent.CurrentController.ViewCursor.Page
In AndrewMacro.odt, look
On 03/04/2013 04:46 AM, Fernand Vanrie wrote:
On 4/03/2013 8:27, M. Fioretti wrote:
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 08:16:25 AM +0100, Fernand Vanrie wrote:
99% percent , changes comes and will come from incompatiliteis in de
API.
for now this is OK, small changes from version to version, but
nothing
They work independently. The best you can likely do is to check the code
or dev documentation to see if it is in both places and if it is marked
deprecated or not.
I do not know how to check the IDL, but, if you figure that out, I
expect that it would not be too difficult to check that for
On 02/22/2013 04:51 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 21:50 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
The issue is purely academic, but if it _has_ to be resolved then yes
a compatibility mode has a much better value that creating an
'alternate' function.
True - though clearly there
I was recently involved in a conversation related Calc and Excel
compatibility. At issue is the fact that LO returns POWER(0,0) = 1 and
Excel returns an error.
I have seen two primary means of dealing with this suggested. The first
is to create a compatibility function for POWER(x,y) to
On 02/05/2013 10:57 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi Samuel,
On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 16:34 +0100, Samuel Mehrbrodt wrote:
as I wanted to include the Clip Art from Symphony in LibreOffice, I
stumbled about the license [1].
A public list is not a great place to discuss that.
IMHO it
Does the patch fix this regression (that fails with 4 RC2)?
Sub badStruct
Dim x As New com.sun.star.beans.PropertyValue
Dim y As New com.sun.star.beans.PropertyValue
x.Name = hello
x.Value = y
End Sub
Unable to test with RC3 yet
On 02/05/2013 10:40 AM, Noel Power (via Code Review)
Reported here:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60371
On 02/06/2013 08:56 PM, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
Does the patch fix this regression (that fails with 4 RC2)?
Sub badStruct
Dim x As New com.sun.star.beans.PropertyValue
Dim y As New com.sun.star.beans.PropertyValue
On 11/28/2012 05:41 PM, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Not sure I understand. My suggestion is that boost::mt19937 is the
only underlying generator algorithm (generating int's) which is then
transformed to get RAND() and RANDBETWEEN(i,j). Yet both are simple
uniform distributions but
On 11/24/2012 10:39 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
Hi All,
We need UX input on this bug:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54975
Seems like we already have two different opinions. Basically we need
to know if a cell should be considered a value if there is no cell
reference in the
On 10/15/2012 10:59 PM, Arno Teigseth wrote:
I had the impression that LO Base Forms are actually writer documents.
They behave mostly like that.
You mean they are not?
If you look at the services supported by the form, what type is it? I
don't have time to check now (late for a meeting),
On 07/19/2012 11:58 AM, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
Hey Eike, Kohei,
2012/7/19 Kohei Yoshida kohei.yosh...@gmail.com:
On 07/19/2012 10:29 AM, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi,
Please review and cherry-pick to 3-6 and 3-6-0
On 07/10/2012 10:07 AM, Noel Grandin wrote:
On 2012-07-10 15:35, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 14:53 +0200, Noel Grandin wrote:
Rather than re-implement such a class/template repeatedly, is there a
common place I could stash such a template, and then include it in the
places it
On 07/11/2012 09:20 AM, Noel Grandin wrote:
On 2012-07-11 15:16, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
How large do you expect the sorted vector to be? I ask because a
linear search is used, which on average will take time n/2 to find
the item and n to not find the item (assuming vector of size n
On 07/05/2012 04:22 AM, Noel Power wrote:
On 05/07/12 02:47, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
On 07/04/2012 03:23 PM, Noel Power wrote:
with
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=1720641bf36306fc296635925e571556ced8a302
a long standing wrinkle with modifying nested structs
It is possible to load document properties from a file on disk. You may
find this of interest:
http://www.oooforum.org/forum/viewtopic.phtml?t=94527
On 06/20/2012 12:54 AM, Rafael Dominguez wrote:
Im trying to fetch document properties like author, creation date,
application that created
On 02/27/2012 11:46 AM, Noel Power wrote:
On 27/02/12 16:02, Andras Timar wrote:
Hi,
2012/2/27 Eike Rathkeer...@redhat.com:
If this is only about no BASIC should be executed, there's the
configuration setting behind Tools-Options-Security, Macro Security.
If Security Level is set to Very High
On 02/26/2012 09:27 AM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
For the iOS port, no BASIC-related functionality can be present if we
want apps using the code to be allowed in the App Store. What would be
the most elegant way (least ifdefs to clutter the code, etc) to
achieve this?
Is it more accurate to say
It just occurred to me, if you disable Basic... How about add-ons and
extensions? For example, I frequently use an add-on / extension to
format certain types of text.
Sadly, I am not in a position to enumerate the extent of the limitations
if Basic is disabled. If simply disabling the IDE is
On 02/21/2012 06:49 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 10:36 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
So - I have already spent some 4 hours, or more, trying to fix this one.
I spent a little time too ;-) cf. my comments in the bug.
IMHO the lifecycle of images is highly
On 02/17/2012 08:31 PM, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
While updating LO documentation using the latest release of LO, most
of the embedded graphics just disappeared so I have been looking at this:
https://www.libreoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33393
I spent a few hours poking around
On 02/18/2012 04:43 PM, julien2412 wrote:
You may find some guidelines to debug LO here :
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/How_to_debug
Julien.
Thanks Julien, very helpful.
I am able to cause the problem every time in LO but unable to cause it
at all in OOo. Have been poking
On 01/20/2012 06:32 AM, Noel Power wrote:
Hi Andrew,
My primary concerns
1. Change in behavior that may break existing code.
the intent of the patch is to restore the previous behaviour ( by
previous behaviour I mean before integration of the feature that
erroneously removed the 'special'
On 01/20/2012 10:30 AM, Noel Power wrote:
On 20/01/12 13:40, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
On 01/20/2012 06:32 AM, Noel Power wrote:
note there is a mistake in the table below
[*] table of behaviour in vba, pre the bug being introduced and post
patch
mso
On 01/16/2012 08:01 AM, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Noel,
On Friday, 2012-01-13 09:51:33 +, Noel Power wrote:
this change ( the variant ) is what is on master, here the
intention is as Andrew pointed out ( in a previous mail discussing
the regression ) to allow operations on date types return
On 01/19/2012 09:03 PM, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
On 01/16/2012 08:01 AM, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Noel,
On Friday, 2012-01-13 09:51:33 +, Noel Power wrote:
this change ( the variant ) is what is on master, here the
intention is as Andrew pointed out ( in a previous mail discussing
On 01/17/2012 04:46 AM, Noel Power wrote:
On 16/01/12 16:59, Eike Rathke wrote:
b) not so risky ( I think ), and... would change the present
behaviour in consistent way for treatment of minus operator
-if( GetType() == SbxDATE || rOp.GetType() ==
SbxDATE )
+
On 01/09/2012 08:16 AM, Noel Power wrote:
On 06/01/12 21:39, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
Off hand, I might be inclined to simply move the code back to its
original location, which would set the behavior back to letting math
with dates return dates, rather than just specific operations
On 01/06/2012 11:48 AM, Noel Power wrote:
Andrew,
Apologies for the late reply, just back from vacation and now trying
to chip away at the mountain of mail backlog
On 01/01/12 16:01, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
Thanks for checking Will wait and see what Noel has to say...
I say I
For what it is worth, I would provide an argument so that you could
enable or disable the generation. I don't really care what the default
is, as long as I can enable or disable doxygen.
What can become easy hacks, though, is to clean up the warnings
doxygen still produces ...
That seems
I created a bug for this.
https://www.libreoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44385
I will poke around and see if I am able to build the source and test a
solution... Running git now.
On 01/01/2012 11:01 AM, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
Thanks for checking Will wait and see what
;
moved from after the switch inside the switch with commit
1421b098ae19a10acb4836fa3752188cf7c52eb2
by Noel Power 06-Dec-2010
and the #if 0 is a WaE fix by Tor Lillqvist 06-Oct-2011
8529da08517b41bd9317714e3216bb6d487b24ee
So I think, Noel should know.
Kind regards
Regina
Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
I thought I found a bug, I decided to take a crack at fixing the bug,
and then I became confused because the bug appears to be intentional.
Let me explain:
Consider some comments related to Basic.
In the last release of OOo, the statement Now + 2 returns a date /
time that is two days later
On 12/09/2011 01:04 AM, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
Hi,
Le 09/12/2011 06:26, Shoubhik Bose a écrit :
Hello,
what is the difference with
auto-completion : Tools AutoCorrectoptions ... Word completion Tab ?
The suggestions are based only on what has been typed in the document
before.
I am
On 11/10/2011 05:14 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 18:05 -0500, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
I assume that this would check for an array as well.
I would feel safer if pointers were set to NULL (or nullptr if we
support C++11) since it is not safe to delete a pointer twice
On 07/16/2011 05:02 AM, Ta Duc Tung wrote:
Hi,
1. How to get current page number for printing?
We've found a variable mnCurPage from printdlg.cxx but it
seems not to be the right one. I think it is current page number for
preview in print dialog.
If I were writing a macro and I
57 matches
Mail list logo
