Moving the follow-up here, as Thorsten suggested.
So, I'm arguing that we can side-step the need for "discovery" in the
P2P sense. Or even more fundamentally: P2P has several meanings. There
is "peer-to-peer networking", where nodes build an ad-hoc network in
which they need such peer discovery;
Sorry for missing a meeting with a few of "my own" bug reports...
On 24/04/2024 21:58, Heiko Tietze wrote:
* Want indication of whether a master slide is in use or not
+ https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160403
+ MSO Powerpoints shows the number of slides in a
Shame on the BoD - current and previous - for carrying out the entire
hiring process for a RTL/CTL/CJK develop while completely shutting out
(*) the RTL language community, for the second time, despite the
explicit protest and demand not to do so.
And it is unfortunate that the ESC acknowledges
Shame on the BoD - current and previous - for carrying out the entire
hiring process for a RTL/CTL/CJK develop while completely shutting out
(*) the RTL language community, for the second time, despite the
explicit protest and demand not to do so.
And it is unfortunate that the ESC acknowledges
On 22/02/2024 16:46, Heiko Tietze wrote:
* Simplified options dialogs
You seem to have ignored the basic problem with how this bug has been
handled, which I pointed out in comment:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90989#c9
+ name, icons, interface, colors, ui
On 22/02/2024 16:46, Heiko Tietze wrote:
* Simplified options dialogs
You seem to have ignored the basic problem with how this bug has been
handled, which I pointed out in comment:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90989#c9
+ name, icons, interface, colors, ui
regarding modification date etc.) ?
On 22/12/2023 9:11, Heiko Tietze wrote:
On 21.12.23 20:05, Eyal Rozenberg wrote:
"LibreOffice unexpectedly and strangely modifies an ODT file without
they user having done anything, and embedding unnecessary fonts nobody
asked it to."
Sounds like ano
I want to draw our attention to the first bug which was on the agenda in
yesterday's design meeting:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158588
I would say that bug is misnamed. It should be called:
"LibreOffice unexpectedly and strangely modifies an ODT file without
they user
In this week's design meeting, bug 158253 came up:
Shapes-via-Gallery is problematic & partially redundant with the Shapes
sub-toolbars and sidebar
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158253
I was not available to attend (it was during my work hours); but since
this is not
I just had a look at the UNCONFIRMED_set chart on BugZilla:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/chart.cgi?category=LibreOffice=UNCONFIRMED_set=2919=2919=All=wrap=1100=350
so, congrats on getting below 1000, but the behavior of that graph is
kind of weird:
* Perfectly linear increase in
ble there will be an automatic updater
mechanism in place, see the ESC minutes from yesterday (
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2023-September/091022.html "The
UI/UX aspect of how to deal with security vulnerabilities" topic)
Regards
On 28/9/23 23:26, Eyal Rozenber
Cheers
Sophi
Le 28/09/2023 à 21:36, Eyal Rozenberg a écrit :
I second John's sentiment.
For the vast majority of LibreOffice users, this security problem is
_not_ fixed. And that is because they run versions of LibreOffice with
the vulnerability but without the fix; and have not been made aware
On Thu, 28 Sept 2023 at 8:13 am, Miklos Vajna
wrote:
Hi Eyal,
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 08:31:04PM +0300, Eyal Rozenberg
mailto:eyalr...@gmx.com>> wrote:
> I would like to ask you to discuss the situation with the recent CVE:
> https://bugs.documentfoundation
llou made 45 changes in 1 month, and 468 changes
in 1 year
Eyal Rozenberg made 41 changes in 1 month, and 324 changes in
1 year
Kaganski, Mike made 29 changes in 1 month, and 144 changes in
1 year
Dieter made 20 changes in 1 month, and 247 changes in 1 year
Oh, no, no, no, come on... I know I wasn't in the session (which I
couldn't since it was in the middle of a workday), but - there had been
extensive discussion on the bug pages, and the session itself seems to
have just ignore it all. This is really exasperating.
Unfortunately, I won't be able to make it... :-(
Can you explain what the "reviewed items" list means? The other lists
have suggestions regarding what to do with each item; is the "reviewed
items" list what you're planning to go over during the meeting?
Also, on a semi-related note and looking
On 15/06/2023 18:29, Heiko Tietze wrote:
Present: Happy, Hossein, Heiko
Comments: Mike, Dieter, Eyal
Tickets/Topics
* More centralized endnote/footnote settings
+ make footnote numbering page-style-specific, rename the Insert > F
dialog "Out-of-order Note" or "Special Note",
On 15/06/2023 18:29, Heiko Tietze wrote:
Present: Happy, Hossein, Heiko
Comments: Mike, Dieter, Eyal
Tickets/Topics
* More centralized endnote/footnote settings
+ make footnote numbering page-style-specific, rename the Insert > F
dialog "Out-of-order Note" or "Special Note",
LibreOffice, like any application, is in a continuing process of gradual
change. Sometimes, these changes make bugs disappear - intentionally, or
incidentally due to other changes. It is important for developers to
know whether this has happened for a reported bug, because if it has:
*
About the tender project proposals:
The minutes refer to this list:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Budget2022
but - there is also this list:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Budget2023
I know that May 28th has passed, but these minutes were only sent
About the tender project proposals:
The minutes refer to this list:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Budget2022
but - there is also this list:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Budget2023
I know that May 28th has passed, but these minutes were only sent
To put last thing first: I'm not staunchly opposed to bumping the
version number to 8. So think of this as a theoretical discussion.
Anyway...
Noting Italo's explanation that:
> 80% (and probably more) of what we communicate is targeted to
"normal" software users, and not to community members
ers (for both enterprise and
individual profiles).
I'm not saying that we should embrace the Firefox approach, but
thinking about Italo's idea (8 <-> infinite), I guess the message of
this version could be consolidation, not exactly innovation.
Best
Gustavo
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 4
I respectfully disagree with Italo.
First, about the "frame of reference". In my opinion, decisions such as
major version number bumping are not, first and foremost, marketing
decisions. That is a _consideration_, since the version number is
declarative than technical. But - such an action
the modification.
Please don't understand input from UX as a gatekeeper to the
development, you are free to reopen tickets and seek for response from
other people.
Cheers,
Heiko
On 15.02.23 22:41, Eyal Rozenberg wrote:
Heiko, you again scheduled bugs of mine for a discussion without
taking
Heiko, you again scheduled bugs of mine for a discussion without taking
a moment to check whether I can join the meeting.
I asked you not to do that and I'm asking you again. This is unfair,
especially after I've explicitly asked that you not do that.
The treatment of these bugs is usually
I have to protest meeting in which most bugs up for discussion are ones I've
either filed or have been part of the discussion on, scheduled without
consulting me regarding the time. I'm at work in the afternoon and can usually
not attend at these hours. And then of course when I'm not there,
On 17/11/2022 16:28, Heiko Tietze wrote:
* Allow regular deletion of selection containing an entire
generated index/table
+ https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152030
+ at creation time and later it is possible to unset the protection
flag
+ the context menu
On 03/11/2022 15:20, Heiko Tietze wrote:
* Writer: Caption strings should be set to document language instead
of UI language
+ https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151020
+ use translation from PS for variable names requested on ask.libo
(André)
+ not much of
On 14/07/2022 0:44, John Mills wrote:
Do you consider people manipulated by asking them an unambiguous
question that would default to no?
"Would you like to place a bet of 100 EUR on a die roll, winning an
extra 100 on a 6 and losing otherwise? [N/Y]: N_
Suppose I ask a million people this
There are a more concerns, and questions, and potential answers to
questions. These include additions I've made after the session
concluded, based partially on my points in the chat, and as suggested I
do by Heiko. For now I'll just add the Questions section after my additions.
Questions
+
So, about https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143197 ...
The bug author, ajlittoz, wrote:
> to be honest, it took me years to develop a satisfactory mental
model, though I read thoroughly the available documentation
I had asked on the bug page regarding whether or not this
sw/inc/strings.hrc |8
sw/uiconfig/swriter/ui/fldrefpage.ui |4 ++--
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 81472692c4ee0b12c6d2184823faefa7a53431e6
Author: Eyal Rozenberg
AuthorDate: Sat May 29 09:56:22 2021 +0200
Commit
All of my past & future contributions to LibreOffice may be licensed
under the MPLv2/LGPLv3+ dual license.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
officecfg/registry/data/org/openoffice/VCL.xcu |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
New commits:
commit 21da461f374357198bafaea02e28d24de02c6772
Author: Eyal Rozenberg
AuthorDate: Sat Feb 13 10:20:36 2021 +0100
Commit: Ilmari Lauhakangas
CommitDate: Tue Feb 16 15:15
, the gzipping
doesn't seem to reduce the total size.
So - please consider not gzipping. You're just wasting people's CPU
cycles for decompressing the tarball. Why not just distribute
libreoffice_whatever.tar ?
Respectfully,
Eyal Rozenberg
PS - Self-introduction for my first post: w.r.t
Hi,
(I'm not sure this list is the right venue - please tell me if it isn't.)
In the hopes of implementing this missing feature:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55436
I'm trying to build LO on Windows (XP). I seem to have downloaded
everything necessary, passing the autogen and
37 matches
Mail list logo
