Re: [Libreoffice] Make dev-install without running smoketests

2011-08-03 Thread Thomas Arnhold
tools-options-security-macro security-low : open libo/smoketestdoc/PLATFORM/bin/smoketestdoc.sxw and click the run button. The error in smoketest is (write test results): assertion caught: Error: sentence indices out of range From File

Re: [Libreoffice] Build problem on Linux 3.0; plea for workflow

2011-08-01 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Marty, On 08/02/2011 12:02 AM, Marty Jack wrote: If there is a way to do site-local patches in your workflow between the unpacking and the building steps, I haven't found it documented. I beg you to think this over and decide to do something about it. I've already fixed this in master and

Re: [Libreoffice] note on unused destructors in unused.easy

2011-07-30 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 07/29/2011 02:23 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 13:52 +0200, Thomas Arnhold wrote: On 07/29/2011 12:05 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: If a destructor is listed in unused.easy as unused then its probably after detecting a leak if at least one of the constructors is used, i.e

Re: [Libreoffice] About merging and people not paying attention

2011-07-29 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 07/29/2011 11:01 AM, Miklos Vajna wrote: On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 03:53:18PM +0200, Thomas Arnholdtho...@arnhold.org wrote: I think this was not intended. Simple solution would be to add some ' HEAD' .* '===' .* ' master' stuff to git hooks. So git would block commits with conflicts.

Re: [Libreoffice] About merging and people not paying attention

2011-07-29 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 07/29/2011 01:37 PM, Miklos Vajna wrote: On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:46:21AM +0200, Thomas Arnholdtho...@arnhold.org wrote: Yeah, I've already found that file. Strangely we already have such a check: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/bootstrap/tree/git-hooks/pre-commit#n61 Oh, now I

Re: [Libreoffice] note on unused destructors in unused.easy

2011-07-29 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 07/29/2011 12:05 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: If a destructor is listed in unused.easy as unused then its probably after detecting a leak if at least one of the constructors is used, i.e. construction without destruction somewhere. Thanks! You mean HttpRequest::~HttpRequest, right? I'm still

Re: [Libreoffice] About merging and people not paying attention

2011-07-27 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 07/27/2011 02:35 PM, Robert Nagy wrote: I would like to ask my fellow developers to be more careful about merging and _touching_ files at all that they don't understand. During the last two days I had to fix several problems that were introduced by merging changes, hell I even found files

Re: [Libreoffice] Kill Dtwm/CDE

2011-07-27 Thread Thomas Arnhold
So I removed this Property checks for various vendors with commit http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-gui/commit/?id=6b344d2654eb6a87f6e759376e7ee988f1a52761 If someone needs this back, feel free to do so (only jobset.{h,c}xx was a mis-merge, sorry for that). Thomas

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEWED] nss/moz: Add Linux 3.0 profile

2011-07-26 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 07/26/2011 11:40 AM, Michael Meeks wrote: Hi Thomas, On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 19:42 +0200, Thomas Arnhold wrote: An additional comment: Problem without this fix is, that you won't be able to compile Libreoffice (3.4) on a plattform with newest kernel. I think this means it's a blocker

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] nss/moz: Add Linux 3.0 profile

2011-07-25 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, I've added a new profile for nss/moz to get it build with a linux kernel 3.0: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-extern-sys/commit/?id=64609b5e174e44bfc49c29cb871d057af740edeb Please cherry-pick this on the libreoffice-3-4 branch. Thomas

[Libreoffice] Kill Dtwm/CDE

2011-07-21 Thread Thomas Arnhold
handling as resizing is correctly working out of the box with newer Sawfish versions (checked it with 1.8.1). Thomas From 716757b7789877575784b68c32c52603ea4baa23 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Arnhold tho...@arnhold.org Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 23:52:21 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Kill dtwm/cde

Re: [Libreoffice] Kill Dtwm/CDE

2011-07-21 Thread Thomas Arnhold
I'm not really sure. I could bring those enum values back. This enum is only used once at: http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/libs-gui/vcl/unx/generic/app/saldisp.cxx#871 Strangely SAL_WM is empty on my PC (gnome). So maybe I let the enums untouched and only remove the uses of dtwm, olwm,

Re: [Libreoffice] Kill Dtwm/CDE

2011-07-21 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Here is the output of PrintInfo(): Environment $XENVIRONMENT $DISPLAY:0.0 $SAL_VISUAL $SAL_FONTPATH $SAL_NOSEGV $SAL_IGNOREXERRORS $SAL_PROPERTIES

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Make base debug.hxx free

2011-07-21 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Jan, Hi Jacek, script approach sounds good. I've used them for conversion from DBG_ to OSL_ already. Should be absolutely no problem to dump DBG_{C,D}TOR with it. If it's ok I'm doing this. Should be done in some 10 minutes + building. Just give me the cue to ;) Thomas On 07/21/2011

Re: [Libreoffice] Kill Dtwm/CDE

2011-07-21 Thread Thomas Arnhold
So I let the enums untouched. It's all pushed to master. There is a strange vendor list at saldisp.cxx. I think some stuff is very outdated, but I have no possibility to check it on Sun etc. http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/libs-gui/vcl/unx/generic/app/saldisp.cxx#362 This vendor stuff

Re: [Libreoffice] Kill Dtwm/CDE

2011-07-21 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 07/21/2011 09:49 PM, Francois Tigeot wrote: Why does LO tinker with window managers in the first place ? Maybe from times where you had to do so (various X servers and implementations) and the idea of StarOffice as all-in-one desktop tool ;) Thomas

Re: [Libreoffice] Doubled files: testsax.cxx?

2011-07-12 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Caolán, I've got it compiled and pushed this to master. As next step I'll check if it does something useful. Thomas ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED-3-4] Libo 3.4.1: Cherry pick for fixing debug build

2011-07-09 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Thanks! On 07/06/2011 12:04 PM, Thorsten Behrens wrote: Thomas Arnhold wrote: it would be nice if this commit could be cherry-picked on libreoffice-3-4-1, because without it a debug build will fail at cui Cherry-picked to libreoffice-3-4. Don't think 3-4-1 makes too much sense

Re: [Libreoffice] Remove CREDITS.odt?

2011-07-09 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 07/04/2011 09:14 PM, Thorsten Behrens wrote: Question is: Is Help-Libreoffice Credits menu entry necessary at all if there's a link to it within the about window? I don't think so. If we remove it, we could remove CREDITS.odt as well. Or at least we need to sync them. Hm, given the wide

[Libreoffice] Doubled files: testsax.cxx?

2011-07-09 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, I've found out, that there's a whole directory doubled in the tree: libs-gui/sax/test/sax and extensions/test/sax I think the first one is the desired and the second could be removed. Or is it intened, that libs-gui/sax/test/sax is an internal sax test and extensions/test/sax is the one

[Libreoffice] Libo 3.4.1: Cherry pick for fixing debug build

2011-07-05 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, it would be nice if this commit could be cherry-picked on libreoffice-3-4-1, because without it a debug build will fail at cui: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/components/commit/?id=3764b31aae43883c6b13b91c6ad8d0daa59f4ba5 Thomas ___

[Libreoffice] Remove CREDITS.odt?

2011-07-04 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, I've seen the latest About LibreOffice window from master, which is pretty awesome. There is a link Contributer credits to the online version of the credits. At Help-LibreOffice Credits there is a link to the offline CREDITS.odt which is out of sync with the online version. Question is:

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fdo#31251 - Improve default page layout

2011-04-16 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, I like your patches for the new smooth shadow. I looked around the other LibO apps like Impress or Draw. They have this shadow already, but it's not as width as in Writer and it's on all sides. Maybe we should do it in Writer as in Draw and Impress. Looks better I think. Here is what I mean:

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] removing the executable mode from some source files

2011-03-23 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, only short note from me: You won't find all wrong chmod'ed files with the help of extensions. For example in bootstrap, there are the file post_download or download. These need to be executable. You could check for these files if you do head -n1 FILE and look if this first line has a

Re: [Libreoffice] _OLD_FILE_IMPL

2011-03-20 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Christina, On 03/20/2011 12:47 PM, Christina Roßmanith wrote: the definition of _OLD_FILE_IMPL is commented out in basic/source/inc/runtime.hxx. So I could remove the parts which are #ifdef'ed with _OLD_FILE_IMPL and remove the #ifndef _OLD_FILE_IMPL statements? Or could _OLD_FILE_IMPL get

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] libs-gui: fix debug build

2011-03-19 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 03/19/2011 12:00 PM, Aurimas Fišeras wrote: Patch is contributed under the LGPLv3+ / MPL. Thanks, but this was already fixed by David. Thomas ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Fix build of presenter extension

2011-03-19 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 03/19/2011 10:59 AM, Aurimas Fišeras wrote: Patch is contributed under the LGPLv3+ / MPL. One got already fixed by David. I adopted the other one as David did with OSL_FAIL. I set you as author, because you pointed it out. Thanks!

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Replace j_assert with OSL_ in writer/starmath

2011-03-19 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Now it's really pushed. Only had problems to apply on cursor.cxx due to m101 merge. Should be fixed. Thanks! Thomas ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Replace j_assert with OSL_ in writer/starmath

2011-03-18 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Jacek, On 03/18/2011 09:14 AM, Jacek Wolszczak wrote: I did compile it with --enable-debug as it's OSL_ specific and it compiled correctly. Haven't used --enable-dbgutil as there are no #ifdef DBG_UTIL in the files I touched. But for the future I will recompile LibreO with both flags

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Replace j_assert with OSL_ in writer/starmath

2011-03-17 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 03/17/2011 11:26 PM, Jacek Wolszczak wrote: Easy hacks align ASSERT ( friends) macro foo patch. Yeah, this looks nice. Did you build this once with --enable-debug and --enable-dbgutil? Thomas ___ LibreOffice mailing list

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] get rid of duplicated .gitattributes files

2011-03-16 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 03/12/2011 11:46 PM, Miklos Vajna wrote: So far we have 4 .gitattributes files in the root of 4 repos with the same contents. To have them in the rest of the repos and avoid duplication, it's better to have a single one in the bootstrap repo and configure the rest of the repos to use that

Re: [Libreoffice] media export ...

2011-03-02 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Fernand, On 03/02/2011 11:48 AM, Fernand Vanrie wrote: 2 Corrections: - I was wrong, in PDF documents we can now embed most off the Video-formats - LO - (windows) still not accept flash video Use Insert - Media and Sound - Select 'All files' as filter, so you are able to add flv videos,

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] Remove dead code

2011-03-01 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Nice, thanks :) Pushed it. Thomas On 02/28/2011 11:21 PM, Michael Lefevre wrote: ACCESSIBLE_EVENT_NOTIFICATION_ENABLED was never define. So the #ifdef #endif brackets could go away. --- .../extended/accessibleiconchoicectrlentry.hxx | 16

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [Patch] remove dead code

2011-03-01 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Thanks, pushed the first one. The second didn't apply (0002-..). Thomas On 02/27/2011 10:26 PM, Xisco Faulí wrote: Remode all dead code from /libs-core/sfx2/source ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] Remove bogus comments

2011-03-01 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Antoine, pushed this, thanks! Probably your name isn't set in the gitconfig, only your mail address was given as author. You could set this with: git config --global user.name Your Name Thomas On 02/28/2011 12:06 AM, Antoine Proulx wrote: Hi, Here's a patch who removes bogus comments.

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Remove Dead Code

2011-03-01 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Thanks! I've pushed it. Deleted three additional comments as they belong to the deleted code. Nice work :) Thomas On 02/27/2011 04:17 PM, Xisco Faulí wrote: Greetings ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Libreoffice] No full justification in master?

2011-03-01 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Khaled, On 03/01/2011 05:10 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote: In locally built libreoffice master I can't get full justification; text is kept left aligned. I tested with the distro packaged 3.3.1 and justification is fine. Can anyone confirm this, or it is just me? Yes, I can confirm this! I've

Re: [Libreoffice] media export ...

2011-03-01 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, On 03/01/2011 06:29 PM, Fernand Vanrie wrote: Video in PDF can been done but it must be Flash-video :-) So: or: we need a on the fly conversion, or you havbe accept Flash video in the LO documents. I can help to do some research but i am not a coder, just a bit off a avandced user. That

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Code cleanliness

2011-03-01 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 03/01/2011 02:07 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: #n123456# bugids are Novell bugids, typically publically available, e.g. #n672421# - https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672421 So they're typically useful information. I've added this information to the Easy Hacks page, under Translate

Re: [Libreoffice] Build fails without gdb installed

2011-02-25 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 02/24/2011 10:37 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: It only does this if the environmental variables DEBUGCPPUNIT or debugcppunit are set. Those aren't automatically set, they have to be set manually when trying to debug a unit test, at which point its reasonable to expect gdb to be installed. Did

Re: [Libreoffice] Tools - Media Player

2011-02-25 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, On 02/25/2011 12:07 PM, Fernand Vanrie wrote: Please consider: We are living and working in a Multi Media world: Not only who is working with Impress needs a media player, all content can have mixed content and LO must be the one stop place to handle all multi media stuff. I partially

Re: [Libreoffice] Remove unused methods

2011-02-24 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Balint, not all of them are unused. getDropDownEntries() and getDropDownResult() are used at FormControlHelper.cxx. But the rest is fine. I applied the rest. Thanks! Thomas On 02/22/2011 05:11 PM, Bálint Dózsa wrote: Hi, I have removed some unused methods. Regards, Balint Dozsa

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] removed commented code

2011-02-24 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Christina, thanks, pushed this! Why don't you commit this by your self? Your patches look good! :) Thomas On 02/24/2011 01:37 PM, Christina Roßmanith wrote: Hi, continued to remove commented code lines. As usual under LGPLv3+ / MPL Christina

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Remove unused commented variable

2011-02-24 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, pushed this. Thanks! Thomas On 02/23/2011 10:47 PM, Michael Lefevre wrote: --- writerfilter/source/dmapper/PropertyMap.cxx |1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/writerfilter/source/dmapper/PropertyMap.cxx

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] Remove commented variable

2011-02-24 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Thanks, pushed this, too :) Thomas On 02/23/2011 11:11 PM, Michael Lefevre wrote: Still code cleaning. --- sc/source/ui/view/gridwin.cxx |1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/sc/source/ui/view/gridwin.cxx b/sc/source/ui/view/gridwin.cxx index

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] Remove more commented unused variables

2011-02-24 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Pushed this. Thanks! Thomas On 02/23/2011 11:03 PM, Michael Lefevre wrote: Keep cleaning the code, line by line. --- filter/source/flash/swfwriter.hxx |2 -- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/filter/source/flash/swfwriter.hxx

[Libreoffice] Build fails without gdb installed

2011-02-24 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, the latest build fails on sal cppunit tests, because I have no gdb installed. This dependency is new, maybe because some tests got enabled. I think configure should check for gdb and turn this test on/off. --- -- - start unit test #1 on

Re: [Libreoffice] Tools - Media Player

2011-02-23 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 02/23/2011 05:46 AM, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: Perhaps you should ask end-users. Some users are using Draw or Writer as a replacement of MS-Publisher. Or Writer to edit their website. Maybe it is useful in these cases ? Right, the website thing came to my mind later, too. But as I said: I

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove include of no more existent errhdl.hxx

2011-02-23 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Sébastien, On 02/23/2011 08:46 AM, Sébastien Le Ray wrote: This patch removes an include which prevent debug build of sw (the file has been deleted in commit 6aa93c291d18c7db6dbee73adc6c4aa1bdc88eda. I removed the whole except directory with dbgloop.cxx in it. Maybe your tree is out of

Re: [Libreoffice] Tools - Media Player

2011-02-23 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Yifan, On 02/23/2011 10:47 AM, Yifan Jiang wrote: I guess end-users could still bring the menu item back using the menu customization UI (Tools-Customize...-Menus). Is that right? That's possible. But for writer and calc the background calls are gone. So it won't work. Maybe I re-enable

Re: [Libreoffice] How to start with some code?

2011-02-22 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Rogerio, you could grep for it in the command line with grep '\$MINLEN' * -R or you could search the source with http://opengrok.libreoffice.org. Then you'll get libs-core/sfx2/source/dialog/password.* as result :) You've already done some contribution with this email! Would be nice if you

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Translation of German comment in libs-core/svx/source/dialog/

2011-02-22 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 02/22/2011 01:52 AM, Kohei Yoshida wrote: On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 21:14 +0100, Albert Thuswaldner wrote: Hi, Translated German comments in libs-core/svx/source/dialog. Made a few other fixes (removed out commented code) along the way. Albert, @@ -515,9 +501,7 @@ void SvxRectCtl::Paint(

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Translate german comments of writer/sw/source/ui/cctrl

2011-02-22 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 02/22/2011 12:06 AM, Martin Kepplinger wrote: Am 21.02.2011 23:08, schrieb Thomas Arnhold: Hi Martin, I've pushed it. Please could you attach such a diff as patch next time? Would be easier to commit it :) Thanks! Thomas On 02/21/2011 10:28 PM, Martin Kepplinger wrote: This translates

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Translate german comments of writer/sw/source/ui/cctrl

2011-02-22 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 02/22/2011 11:38 AM, Thomas Arnhold wrote: On 02/22/2011 12:06 AM, Martin Kepplinger wrote: Am 21.02.2011 23:08, schrieb Thomas Arnhold: Hi Martin, I've pushed it. Please could you attach such a diff as patch next time? Would be easier to commit it :) Thanks! Thomas On 02/21/2011 10

Re: [Libreoffice] Tools - Media Player

2011-02-22 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, I've finally removed the menu entry from calc, writer and draw. Thomas ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] Tools - Media Player

2011-02-22 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Yeah right, but on writer, calc and draw? It's still in impress. Or are you using it from the other apps? Thomas On 02/22/2011 09:47 PM, Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai wrote: Sometimes Mediaplayer is useful. Inserting video, preview, etc. KAMI ___

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] 386BSD and MACH defines.

2011-02-21 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Nice. I let those files untouched, thought they came from X. I'll remove hpux and this other stuff soon. Thomas On 02/21/2011 05:19 PM, Francois Tigeot wrote: The attached patch a 386BSD #defined test (the only one ?) If nobody objects, I'll push it in a few hours. I have left the MACH

Re: [Libreoffice] Build speedup

2011-02-21 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 02/17/2011 01:02 PM, Francois Tigeot wrote: On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:08:58AM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: CSET is probably also complete foo IIRC. Though I don't know to what it referred. I don't know if these cleanups are the reason, but my builds are now faster by a few minutes.

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove TCPP support

2011-02-21 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 02/17/2011 10:39 AM, Tor Lillqvist wrote: TCPP seems to be an old compiler. Turbo C++ ? --tml Yes, thanks :) ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove TCPP support

2011-02-21 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 02/17/2011 11:08 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 10:34 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: Ah, forgot one. All looks good, go for it. CSET is probably also complete foo IIRC. Though I don't know to what it referred. C. IBM CSet C- Compiler - I'll remove this one, too

[Libreoffice] Removed ASSERT_ID and errhdl.[ch]xx

2011-02-21 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, I've recently replaced all ASSERT_ID() macros with OSL_ASSERT(). Therefore errhdl.[hc]xx became obsolete. So I removed these files. There was a line in errhdl.hxx: SW_DLLPUBLIC void AssertFail( USHORT, const sal_Char* ); With this removed I changed the API, right? There is one file left

Re: [Libreoffice] Removed ASSERT_ID and errhdl.[ch]xx

2011-02-21 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 02/21/2011 06:37 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 18:20 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: SW_DLLPUBLIC void AssertFail( USHORT, const sal_Char* ); With this removed I changed the API, right? Sure, but only an internal API, the external API, i.e. the bits that extensions link

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Translate german comments of writer/sw/source/ui/cctrl

2011-02-21 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Martin, I've pushed it. Please could you attach such a diff as patch next time? Would be easier to commit it :) Thanks! Thomas On 02/21/2011 10:28 PM, Martin Kepplinger wrote: This translates the few german code comments in the cctrl directory to english. This is contributed under the

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Comment fix

2011-02-21 Thread Thomas Arnhold
I've pushed it. Thanks! Thomas On 02/21/2011 10:03 PM, Martin Kepplinger wrote: This fixes a typo that occured during translation. thanks. This is contributed under the terms of the LGPLv3+/MPL dual license. --- sw/source/ui/app/docsh2.cxx |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Translation of German comment in libs-core/svx/source/customshapes/

2011-02-21 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Albert, thanks! I've pushed it. But could you please separate your dead code removal and translation? It makes it hard to review this and if some dead looking code should come back later it's harder to do this (with translations in one diff). :) Thanks for your patches! Thomas On 02/21/2011

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Translation of German comment in libs-core/svx/source/dialog/

2011-02-21 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Yeah, thanks! Had some trouble with the diff - at the end of file there were some accidentally redos of some prior changes. I removed them (CSET and tools/list.h). And there were lots of trailing whitespaces. But now it's all fine. Thanks! Thomas On 02/21/2011 09:14 PM, Albert Thuswaldner wrote:

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove TCPP support

2011-02-17 Thread Thomas Arnhold
ce9dd25c9b5383daa6259a1e328d3409a0b60778 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Arnhold tho...@arnhold.org Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:21:47 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Remove TCPP Seems to be an old compiler --- rsc/source/prj/gui.cxx |2 +- rsc/source/prj/start.cxx |4 ++-- rsc/source/rscpp

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove TCPP support

2011-02-17 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Ah, forgot one. On 02/17/2011 10:31 AM, Thomas Arnhold wrote: Hi, TCPP seems to be an old compiler. Google doesn't know anything about it, but there were some comments in the source which let me conclude that this a compiler. I've removed it from filter and writer. For libs-gui I need

Re: [Libreoffice] Files without Copyright notice

2011-02-16 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Yeah, thanks for fixing them :) Thomas On 02/16/2011 09:36 AM, Noel Power wrote: Hi Thomas, On 14/02/11 21:02, Thomas Arnhold wrote: On 02/14/2011 09:32 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 19:45 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: Yes, some of them. I've corrected the list. Many

Re: [Libreoffice] Files without Copyright notice

2011-02-16 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Caolán, I'm looking ahead this at the weekend. Maybe it's worth a task to write a little lint script which checks if new files have a copyright header. Thomas On 02/14/2011 10:10 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 22:02 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: You're right

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-16 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, And another thing, in combination with GCC: C272 (occurs with GCC) i.e. at impress/sd/source/ui/view/zoomlist.cxx:#if ( defined GCC defined C272 ) . Doesn't look that this is set anymore. Yeah, you got me there. No idea where C272 came from. I strongly suspect it was set to indicate

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-16 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 02/15/2011 10:28 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 22:22 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: Of the ports listed on http://porting.openoffice.org/ , Tru64 is dead and I would be surprised if VMS and Linux/m68k were much alive. Yeah, only take the completed one, VMS and Tru64

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Remove dead code

2011-02-16 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Great! Pushed it! Thanks. Thomas On 02/16/2011 07:16 PM, Bálint Dózsa wrote: Hi, I have removed some dead code form //xml2cmp, /xmlhelp/ and //xmloff/. My code is under the LGPLv3+/MPL dual license. Regards, Balint Dozsa ___

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove OSF/1 support

2011-02-16 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Francois, in the meantime I removed HPUX and SCO support. Found out, that osarch.pm is pretty unused ;) I didn't touch libs-extern(-sys) and dmake, too. Your patchset looks good. Thomas On 02/16/2011 08:49 PM, Francois Tigeot wrote: The attached patches remove OSF/1 support from the build

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] Remove unused macro

2011-02-16 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 02/16/2011 03:40 PM, Francois Tigeot wrote: On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 01:06:47PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 13:03 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 08:55:12AM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: Are the UUID_SYSTEM_TIME_RESOLUTION_100NS_TICKS defines in

Re: [Libreoffice] WIN16 references

2011-02-16 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 02/16/2011 09:53 PM, Francois Tigeot wrote: On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 09:15:37PM +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: in the meantime I removed HPUX and SCO support. Looking at your diffs for the SCO stuff, I found a _WIN16 test. It seems many files are infected with WIN16 references, most

Re: [Libreoffice] WIN16 references

2011-02-16 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 02/16/2011 09:53 PM, Francois Tigeot wrote: On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 09:15:37PM +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: in the meantime I removed HPUX and SCO support. Looking at your diffs for the SCO stuff, I found a _WIN16 test. It seems many files are infected with WIN16 references, most

[Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-15 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, i stumbled across some precompiler checks for several (deprecated?) arches: HP9000 (already removed some parts of this) SINIX RM400 ... And another thing, in combination with GCC: C272 (occurs with GCC) i.e. at impress/sd/source/ui/view/zoomlist.cxx:#if ( defined GCC defined C272 ) .

Re: [Libreoffice] Tools - Media Player

2011-02-15 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, On 02/12/2011 10:01 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 23:08 +0100, Christoph Noack wrote: what the heck do we do with Tools - Media Player? Do we need this within an office suite? Is anyone using this?! :-) My suspicion is that ~no-one is using it. I think the same.

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] fdo#32552 (alt key opens File-menu)

2011-02-15 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Julien, I've compiled and tested it. Works fine. I read the bug description and there was said, that on Windows Alt works as F6 on Linux - to set focus on the menubar. Now we completely got rid of this with Alt on Linux. Is this intentionally, say that Alt alone has no effect at all? I

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] Remove bogus comments

2011-02-14 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Thanks! On 02/14/2011 02:01 PM, Thorsten Behrens wrote: Thomas Arnhold wrote: Didn't know that there are bug numbers like this #b449874#. Those are from the old Sun-internal bugtracker (in contrast to the old StarDivision-internal bugtracker, which is w/o letter prefix) - and can be elided

Re: [Libreoffice] duplicate code (binfilter)

2011-02-14 Thread Thomas Arnhold
I've updated the wiki. On 02/14/2011 10:40 AM, Michael Meeks wrote: Hi Christina, On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 21:07 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote: binfilter/bf_svtools/source/config/svt_menuoptions.cxx and svtools/source/config/menuoptions.cxx So - as Tor says, binfilter is

Re: [Libreoffice] [Partially Pushed] Patch

2011-02-14 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Balint, looks good. I've pushed the second one. I slightly changed your patch - removed the newlines for the empty methods and didn't remove the description in writerfilter/inc/doctok/WW8Document.hxx as this is some kind of doxygen code. For the first patch, which removes the method, I'm not

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Patch

2011-02-14 Thread Thomas Arnhold
, Thomas Arnhold wrote: Hi Balint, looks good. I've pushed the second one. I slightly changed your patch - removed the newlines for the empty methods and didn't remove the description in writerfilter/inc/doctok/WW8Document.hxx as this is some kind of doxygen code. For the first patch, which

[Libreoffice] Files without Copyright notice

2011-02-14 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, I stumbled across some files w/o any copyright notice in writerfilter/source/dmapper. So I grep'ed around and found are more or less long list of files with copyright notice missing. I've attached it to the mail. I've only searched for cxx and hxx files. I filed a bug at OOo:

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] cppcheck easyhack

2011-02-14 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Thanks! Pushed it. Thomas On 02/14/2011 07:54 PM, Kevin Hunter wrote: Hullo List, One, likely final, cppcheck-found post- to pre-iterator patch. Cheers, Kevin ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Libreoffice] Files without Copyright notice

2011-02-14 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 02/14/2011 09:32 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 19:45 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: Hi, I stumbled across some files w/o any copyright notice in writerfilter/source/dmapper. So I grep'ed around and found are more or less long list of files with copyright notice missing

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] Remove bogus comments in components and impress

2011-02-13 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Thanks for all of them! I pushed them all. I deleted one additional line in cui/source/tabpages/numfmt.cxx: //@ aEdFormat.SetText( aLbFormat.GetSelectEntry() ); as this also belong to a deleted comment. Thomas On 02/13/2011 02:08 PM, Guillaume Poussel wrote: Second part.

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [Patch] Remove bogus comments and dead code from editeng

2011-02-13 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, nice, thanks for this! I pushed it. As far as I know there is no need to reformat the code, because this should be done by a script some time later (and we want to be compatible to diffs from OOo). Thomas On 02/13/2011 03:29 PM, Arnaud Versini wrote: Hi, Remove some comments from

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] Remove bogus comments

2011-02-13 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Looks good. Thanks! I pushed it. Didn't know that there are bug numbers like this #b449874#. Thomas On 02/13/2011 01:57 AM, Antoine Proulx wrote: Hi, Here's a patch (another one) who removes bogus comments. It's released under the LGPLv3+ / MPL. Antoine

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [Patch] Easy hack: idl removed and translated comments

2011-02-13 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Thanks! I pushed it all. Thomas On 02/13/2011 01:26 AM, Michael Münch wrote: Hi, first attempt so I will take any advise (split the patch into smaller files?). License is LGPLv3+/MPL. I would have edited the wiki that I am working on this directory but the registration is disabled.

Re: [Libreoffice] Tools - Media Player

2011-02-13 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Christoph thanks for the discussion link and the specs! On 02/12/2011 10:01 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 23:08 +0100, Christoph Noack wrote: what the heck do we do with Tools - Media Player? Do we need this within an office suite? Is anyone using this?! :-) My

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove Xine

2011-02-13 Thread Thomas Arnhold
I did this already, as the registration for the wiki doesn't work at the moment. Thomas On 02/13/2011 10:19 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 18:07 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote: Hello, Here is a patch to remove xine. I think that was an Easy Hack, can you remove it from that

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] Easy hack: remove obsolete gjc aot compilation

2011-02-13 Thread Thomas Arnhold
I pushed it now. Wanted that someone had a look at it ;) On 02/13/2011 10:38 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 17:02 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: And I removed configure.cmd as it's a personal file (local paths and so on). Yeah, remove that, and the aot removal looks good too

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Easy hack: remove obsolete gjc aot compilation

2011-02-12 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, I've removed gjc aot from the build system. I grep'd for occurances inside other repos, but it doesn't match anything. Looks like this is all. LibO builds an runs fine on Linux. Thomas From a67a2555a34b07babfc809e7d58e9ee6c8f3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Arnhold tho

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Dead Java code

2011-02-12 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Luke, thanks for that. But could you please use git format-patch for the next patches? Would be easier. Thanks for the patch! Thomas On 02/12/2011 06:15 PM, L P wrote: Deleted some more commented-out code in xmerge. Code is contributed under the LGPLv3+ / MPL. Luke

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Easy hack: more commented out code

2011-02-12 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Luke, I applied patchfile one only partially. These @param and @autor tags are important for javadoc. Thanks! Thomas On 02/12/2011 06:36 PM, Luke Petrolekas wrote: First patch deletes two commented lines out and removes four bogus comments. The second patch deletes some commented out

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Easy hack: more commented out code

2011-02-12 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Pushed. On 02/12/2011 06:57 PM, Thomas Arnhold wrote: Hi Luke, I applied patchfile one only partially. These @param and @autor tags are important for javadoc. Thanks! Thomas On 02/12/2011 06:36 PM, Luke Petrolekas wrote: First patch deletes two commented lines out and removes four

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] More dead code in xmerge

2011-02-12 Thread Thomas Arnhold
This one got obsolete by one of your other patches. Thomas On 02/12/2011 05:56 PM, L P wrote: Deleted some more commented-out code in xmerge. code is contributed under the LGPLv3+ / MPL. Luke ___ LibreOffice mailing list

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Remove bogus comments

2011-02-12 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, thanks, looks nice! Pushed it! Thomas On 02/12/2011 09:12 PM, Antoine Proulx wrote: Hi, Here's a patch who removes bogus comments. It's released under the LGPLv3+ / MPL. Antoine ___ LibreOffice mailing list

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >