back port to 7.6.5 for tdf#158442 to open LO hybridPDF in correct module

Looks like this got forgotten: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/160306 -- Stuart

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ESC meeting minutes: 2023-04-13

> -> + Shortcuts for "Zoom in" and "Zoom out" > > https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45705 > ... > + Word has no zoom in/out, unclear what to do > ... Actually, the Word 2019 desktop canvas responds to "pinch" zoom on trackpad and on touch screens. And similar to LO Zoom

Re: [libreoffice-accessibility] Re: high contrast accessibility application guidelines?

Caolán, * These Microsoft notes are helpful in general with some specifics for Windows os/DE implementors: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/winauto/high-contrast-parameter https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/controls/supporting-high-contrast-themes Stuart

Re: sigma symbol tailoring

Also, the Formula bar's split button implementation uses an opcode to choose the action to apply. They are not GTK .UI button linked UNO commands. However, there is the .uno:AutoSum that does the original action. So, you can customize to assign to Menu, a Toolbar, a Context menu, or a Keyboard

Going to need an rc4 build of 7.1.0, some unacceptable omissions

Prominent UI warts suggest 7.1.0 is not ready to go out the door: tdf#139781 - missing icons from Start Center tdf#138051 - buttons for the "new" UI Picker feature are blocked Another rc with those patches applied, please. ___ LibreOffice mailing list

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] Sidebar deck HIG discussion - calculated minimum-width vs. resize to collapse

The Sidebar HIG -- is currently silent on behavior of width of the Deck and as a result we have issues like tdf#89984 and ill-conceived fixed-width "lets return to src"

Sidebar deck HIG discussion - calculated minimum-width vs. resize to collapse

The Sidebar HIG -- is currently silent on behavior of width of the Deck and as a result we have issues like tdf#89984 and ill-conceived fixed-width "lets return to src"

Re: Status of Windows builds TB77

Christian Lohmaier-3 wrote >> ... as a workaround I created an additional jobconfiguration that > disables the switch. OK confirm the new configuration is posting a nightly build. But seems the packaging drops a VC++ runtime that is needed to run. On launch get a missing VCRUNTIME140_1.dll

Re: Status of Windows builds TB77

sberg wrote > On 03/03/2020 08:49, Noel Grandin wrote: >> I have reverted the libmerged patch that likely triggered this. >> >> Lets see if tonight is any better. Still no joy. The build log suggests a Visual Studio configuration issue... brief Build Log for tree: MASTER Created at: Thu Mar 5

Re: Status of Windows builds TB77

sberg wrote > On 27/02/2020 17:22, Noel Grandin wrote: >> scheduled an admin_slave_cleaning job for tb77, lets see if that helps > > Before you schedule an admin_slave_cleaning job, you must set the > relevant computer's # of executors to 1, and set it back to the original > value after the

Re: Status of Windows builds TB77

So, https://gef6d1789e45cc9b3ab8a351d84d98dd81cfd84a0^! may have rolled, but TB77 is still stuck. The other Jenkins Windows builds seem to be turning, but none of them upload a TDF

Status of Windows builds TB77

The Jenkins hosted TB77 nightly for 64bit Windows builds has not posted a package since 14 Feb, does it need a nudge? Logs are obtuse. But the other Windows TBs (TB72, TB73) seem to be building. Stuart ___ LibreOffice mailing list

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: tweaking Antispam plugin

@Xisco, * Xisco Fauli wrote > 'Close' is just another status, so if you can change any bug to NEW or > NEEDINFO you can change them to CLOSED as well. However, it depends on > the bug's workflow. Only RESOLVED or VERIFIED bugs can be set to CLOSED > afterwards. /me --*facepalm*-- Never made

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: tweaking Antispam plugin

V Stuart Foote wrote >> contributors limits who can change priority, severity, qa field, and >> assigned So, yes I am in the BZ contributors group--but not sure members the "contributors" group actually have the capability to 'close' or 'request delete' of an issu

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: tweaking Antispam plugin

Xisco Fauli wrote > What do you mean? you are already in the contributor group. you > shouldn't have any limitation or am I missing something? Though QA active before the cut over from the FreeDesktop BZ instance, don't think I've ever had ability to 'close' a bug, nor to mark obvious spam for

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: tweaking Antispam plugin

Xisco, Here is one for you: tdf#34355 Stuart p.s. could you add me to the admin or set permissions so I can do QA 'close', and set 'deletion request' -- Sent from:

An MDI as a new MUFFIN feature, tdf#37124 and the framework/source/tabwin legacy

In hopes of moving tdf#37124 along and suggest another MUFFIN feature to support an MDI -- Tabbed multi-document interface, was poking around in dark areas of source and found this gem [1]: https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@framework.openoffice.org/msg00065.html The GSOC 2005 project was for

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] An MDI as a new MUFFIN feature, tdf#37124 and the framework/source/tabwin legacy

In hopes of moving tdf#37124 along and suggest another MUFFIN feature to support an MDI -- Tabbed multi-document interface, was poking around in dark areas of source and found this gem [1]: https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@framework.openoffice.org/msg00065.html The GSOC 2005 project was for

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [libreoffice-documentation] Buttons/Icons missing from the form Formatting Toolbar.

Believe display of the LTR and RTL toolbar buttons are dependent on the Language settings. Support for CTL (language can be none) must be checked enabled (Tools -> Options -> Language Settings -> Languages). Then restart Calc. Works like that for me on Windows 10 with 6.2.2 and current

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

From: Libreoffice-qa on behalf of Michael Meeks Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2018 9:35 AM To: libreoffice-dev; libreoffice...@lists.freedesktop.org > * CTRL+ALT+E isn't opening the extension dialog but inserts a "é" > +

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Confusion about most recent builds

Yes that is correct, in the timed-based release development of LibreOffice there are always two "release" branches in active developement/support, with a third master branch in active development. https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan If you have been asked to check a current build,

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Confusion about most recent builds

It depends on what you need--there are 3 active build branches 5.4 Stable (5.4.7 upcomming release); 6.0 Fresh (6.0.3 upcomming release) and master/6.1. Master has the most recent & ongoing development work--new features and initial patches of bugs will occur normally occur on master builds and

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Saying Goodbye

Jay -- Thank you! Stuart -- Sent from: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/QA-f3613148.html ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings:

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] Dropping the UX-Advise ML from META and topical BZ issues

Heiko, Have noticed you are liberally deleting the UX-Advise ML recipient from BZ META issues and some topical issues. Is there a reason? While these issues may have had their Keyword "needUXEval" removed (or not assigned) use of the UX-Advise ML remains an efficient way to route the BZ

Re: freieFarbe/freeColour HLC colour system to be accepted as a national standard for "Open Colour Communication" in Germany

Christoph Schäfer wrote > ... > > Currently, an older version of the HLC palette is already included in > Scribus 1.5.3+ (L*a*b*) and the latest LibreOffice (sRGB). And speaking of > Scribus, the juicy bit is that the colour reference will most likely be > produced with Scribus 1.5.4svn, because

[Libreoffice-qa] DirectWrite deficienies holding open BZ issues

@Xisco, * Notice we'd reverted a number of closings for BZ issues that are cleared by Khaled's tweak for tdf#112486 "...optionally not using GDI when not using OpenGL (previously we always used GDI when OpenGL was used). I think it

[Libreoffice-qa] New BZ spam vector

Xisco, * This morning saw a new twist to the BZ spam issues. See existing valid bug tdf#104252 [1], where a BZ user changes elements, linkages and drops in URL links in the URL and Whiteboard fields. The link is to a valid URL containing malware payload (a malformed script in this case). How to

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla spam

Another round of spam clobbering BZ all last week and continuing. Anything that can be done? Perhaps the AntiSpam extension for our BZ instance? =-ref-= https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1306750 -- View this message in context:

Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] GSOC work on Special Character dialog

yglot usage. I'd say that is far more than 5% of our users. Stuart > From: Heiko Tietze > Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 7:46 AM > To: V Stuart Foote > Cc: libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] GSOC work on Special Character dialog > &g

Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] GSOC work on Special Character dialog

[2] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PxkIpkzgWF1cX9oQmBhjiTBhUXvUEqbz06Bn4hzbF54/edit [3] http://www.babelstone.co.uk/Software/BabelMap.html From: Heiko Tietze <tietze.he...@googlemail.com> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 6:25 AM To: V Stuart Foote Cc: libreoffi

Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] GSOC work on Special Character dialog

2 [2] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PxkIpkzgWF1cX9oQmBhjiTBhUXvUEqbz06Bn4hzbF54/edit [3] http://www.babelstone.co.uk/Software/BabelMap.html > From: Heiko Tietze > Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 6:25 AM > To: V Stuart Foote > Cc: libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advis

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] GSOC work on Special Character dialog

@Samuel, Heiko, Akshay, * Looks like Akshay is making progress on his GSOC special character dialog work. But I am concerned that the "Characters" edit bar of the dialog has been dropped from the UI. And now only have the new "Recent Characters" glyph boxes available. Functionally the

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Incomplete text in menus and dialogs in 5.4.0.1

@Pedro, I looked closer and the "1" and "y", are from Tahoma. Just the x-height and crossbar position had looked stretched vertically to me--compared Segoe and Tahoma side by side the clip shows Tahoma. Sorry for that noise. As to the funky x-scale--unable to reproduce. Tried various Windows

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Incomplete text in menus and dialogs in 5.4.0.1

@Pedro, You seem to have set a system font other than Segoe UI or Tahoma (looking at the x-height and crossbar positioning). Do you have a LibreOffice replacment table in use? If so clear that and retest, otherwise reset you system font to something with better/correct font metrics. Stuart

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] proposed keyword filter:docbook

Terrence Enger wrote > Would it be a good idea to have this keyword?  If so, who can make it > happen? Easily done, but looking at the volume for "docbook" or ".dbk" (24 over project duration), probably not necessary. When we triage we try to toss any filter issues into the "filters and storage"

Re: Windows / font / text futures ...

Apologies for reviving this thread rather than spinning anew, think this is germane. A year on and Khaled's clean-up of the the HarfBuzz common layout implementation is mostly done, including a bunch of work that was needed for font handling. Thanks! But there are a few warts with the results

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Invalid ODF

Michael Stahl-2 wrote > ... together with an ODF meta-bug that was created in 2015 and that i've > never heard of? I searched but somehow missed Jay's meta -- BZ link is tdf#95487 alias as *ODF-spec*. Added the Keyword and Whiteboard

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Invalid ODF

@Regina, * Regina Henschel wrote > ... > does a meta issue exists for those bugs, where LibreOffice writes > invalid ODF? Or is there a way to mark such bugs in a consistent way? Strangely, no META that I could find--but probably needed. Otherwise some inconsistent use of Whiteboard "odf"

Re: LODev 5.4.0 TB62 x86 test build for Windows XP

s/Breakbad/Breakpad / -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LODev-5-4-0-TB62-x86-test-build-for-Windows-XP-tp4210986p4210987.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ LibreOffice mailing list

LODev 5.4.0 TB62 x86 test build for Windows XP

@Cloph, * The TB62 test build for Windows XP Version: 5.4.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 3d53ec9b2d1c4514adf90ea68915f20ce4d5bc81 CPU threads: 1; OS: Windows 5.1; UI render: default; Locale: en-US (en_US); Calc: group with

Windows TB builds

None of the Windows TB builds of master (TB 39, 42, 62) are posting. Don't know the cause, but we're waiting on a TB build to get a look at some of Khaled's latest for font handling for Default and OpenGL rendering. Thanks. -- View this message in context:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 5.2.6 RC2 test builds available

Jean-Baptiste Faure-3 wrote > Is it on purpose that RC are not made available on the Development > versions webpage: https://www.libreoffice.org/download/pre-releases/ ? Actually the link to Access the Pre-releases server and pick the version of your choice there.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes of the Design Hangout: 2017-Feb-09

mhenriday wrote > ​... > Many thanks, Heiko, to all of you for the work you are doing on this > matter. Would it be possible to request the option to customise toolbar > *location*, so that it could be moved from the right to the left side by > those of us who, for one reason or another, are so

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Call for testing. Shutdown problems in Windows

m.a.riosv wrote > there are not daily windows's builds since at least a couple of weeks, > for 5.2 and 5.3 No, Thorsten's TB42 has been rolling master each night. http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Win-x86@42/ Just Kendy's TB39 and Cloph's TB62 have been missing. -- View this

Re: Need for a 5.2.4.3 build? Windows font handling issue.

The BZ issue for this is tdf#105015 -- Crash in: ImplReleaseTempFonts(SalData &) . -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Need-for-a-5-2-4-3-build-Windows-font-handling-issue-tp4204127p4204375.html

Need for a 5.2.4.3 build? Windows font handling issue.

In a late change to 5.2 for tdf#103514 5.2.4.2 went out with a glitch in salfont.cxx not picked up in 5.2.4.1 Khaled has reverted, but errors are piling up against 5.2.4.2

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'libreoffice-5-3' - extras/Package_palettes.mk extras/source

792d7d29688a0273f346a9baa23d415a7f8f55d8 Author: V Stuart Foote <vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu> Date: Fri Nov 25 15:16:31 2016 -0600 tdf#80196 - rename palette to tonal.soc and adjusting names for 5.3.0 renamed from tonal_column.soc and removed abbreviations Cha

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: extras/Package_palettes.mk extras/source

98419425080f58880f2d0d85749a4a55e8abb40b Author: V Stuart Foote <vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu> Date: Fri Nov 25 15:16:31 2016 -0600 tdf#80196 - another attempt at renaming to tonal.soc and adjusting names now for 5.4.0 master and dropping abreviations Cha

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: extras/source

extras/source/palettes/tonal.soc | 161 --- 1 file changed, 161 deletions(-) New commits: commit 2bea44c420c3d2dcc55504c3922aea8562a35db8 Author: V Stuart Foote <vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu> Date: Mon Nov 21 19:22:14 2016 + Revert &quo

HarfBuzz common layout -- needs 64-bit build testing on Windows

The new HarfBuzz (1.3.2) based common layout with GDI and OpenGL rendering on Windows is really an improvement. I've not experienced any major issues with SAL_USE_COMMON_LAYOUT, but all my testing has been with 32-bit TB Windows builds. I'm leaning toward Khaled's position that it be enabled by

Re: Merging feature/commonsallayout branch

On Windows 8.1 & 10 builds (32-bit master TB62) and the Alpha1 build, HARFBUZZ unified text is having some issues with OpenGL rendering. With default GPU rendering it is doing pretty well. See tdf#103365 - Text isn't showing in the new commonsallayout if OpenGL is on

Re: minutes of ESC call ...

Michael Meeks-5 wrote > * UX Update (Heiko) > * 'Muffin' concept proposed by marketing > + extended toolbar vs. notebookbar > + http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=muffin > + concern wrt. naming (Norbert) --MUFFIN-- from "MUltiple INterface Form Factors" was coined by

Re: MSVC 14.0 U3: LO msi package put VC redist libraries in wrong directory

Checked and all the VS2015 runtime elements listed in https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/msvc-x86_64#Unsolved_problems_.28help_wanted.29 were installed to C:\Windows\System32 as desired. Nothing ended up in a C:\System64

Re: MSVC 14.0 U3: LO msi package put VC redist libraries in wrong directory

@David, * OK, sucess. But had to do a bit to meet the KB2999226 issue to get your VS2015 build to run. Following guidelines of the KB 2999226 article and clear the api-ms-win-crt-convert-l1-1-0.dll requirement, have to first install KB 2919355 (and its requirements). So... Windows 8.1 Update

Re: MSVC 14.0 U3: LO msi package put VC redist libraries in wrong directory

@David, * Spun up a new Windows 8.1 Ent 64-bit en-US as a virtual machine on VMWare 12 The C:\Windows\System32 directory contains msvcp60.dll msvcr100_clr0400.dll msvcr120_clr0400.dll msvcp120_clr0400.dll CLI install msiexec.exe /i LibreOfficeDev_5.3.0.0.alpha0_Win_x64.msi WRITEREGISTRY=1

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] (no subject)

@Markus, * Looks like we can "Custom Search" search on the "Crash report or crash signature" for an "is not empty" value, so only advantage to having a keyword set would be to identify the BZ as being generated from the CR portal on review rather than by a user when the CR is submitted. Would

Re: A toolbar option that makes it easier to type using unicode

Additionally, we already support this with the Special Character dialog. It allows one to select by Unicode block, and has the Characters field to compse with, picking glyphs and inserting into a paragraph when ready. In fact, the only missing element now for handling Unicode as requested by OP

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Markus Mohrhard wrote >> + Most Pressing Bugs: >> http://tdf.io/mostressingbugs >> + tdf#100295 - LibODev-5.2.0.0.b2 does not run in Windows_XP (32 >> or 64 bit) >> + Interest in fixing ? (or is this a 'feature' ?) >> + Tor - thinks a feature. >>

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Writer] Inserting dummy text, changing font to a non-existing one leads to grey menues in 5.2.0.0RC1

Hello Thomas, Tested your exact STR on Windows 10 Pro 64-bit en-US with Version: 5.2.0.1 (x64) Build ID: fcbcb4963bda8633ba72bd2108ca1e802aad557d CPU Threads: 8; OS Version: Windows 6.19; UI Render: GL; Locale: en-US (en_US) Can not reproduce on Windows. So, for others can you identify your

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Testing - Slowness Enable Extended tips?

Miguel Ángel, * On Windows 10 Pro 64-bit en-US with a clear user profile Version: 5.2.0.1 (x64) Build ID: fcbcb4963bda8633ba72bd2108ca1e802aad557d CPU Threads: 8; OS Version: Windows 6.19; UI Render: GL; Locale: en-US (en_US) Sorry, no noticeable delay when opening LibreOffice and setting the

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Adding a field for crash reports to bugzilla

Markus, This sounds great, assisting the users to post the minidump details to BZ should help both QA triage, and developer response. And of course the QA Wiki will need to include some guidance on what to do with the minidumps. Two questions... 1.) can our BZ infrastructure grow to hold

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibODev-5.2.0.0.b2 does not run in Windows_XP (32 or 64 bit)

Issue opened in BugZilla as tdf#100295 . Things have been getting worse, time to officially drop support of Windows XP at 5.2.0? -- View this message in context:

Re: Save as pdf - should we embed the document?

@Wol,* Wols Lists wrote > I know developers love to add bells and whistles, and aiui when you > "save as pdf" from LO it can now embed the original document in the pdf > to make it easy to get the document back into editable form, but the > attached email below makes me think "is this wise?".

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibODev-5.2.0.0.b2 does not run in Windows_XP (32 or 64 bit)

@Cloph, * Just did a clean VM install of 32-bit Windows XP sp3, no other updates. Then I also get the same error message. And the GetTickCount64 looks a bit suspicious, what is that? Stuart -- View this

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Print current page

Pretty obvious. A specific "Print current page" action was deemed unneeded as the Print Dialog "Pages" field provides capability to select just the single page via radio button. That field is populated with the "current" page on opening the dialog. No sense in a single action .uno command as

[Libreoffice-qa] provide Bugzilla master to 5.3.0 notation

Robinson, Christian, Joel, * With beta1 for 5.2.0 out, the Bugzilla needs an update to move master to a 5.3.0 notation. Thanks! Stuart -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/provide-Bugzilla-master-to-5-3-0-notation-tp4185262.html Sent from the QA mailing list

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Check for update

@Pedro, Pedro wrote > Bump! > > One week later (and 18 days after 5.1.3 release) version 5.1.2.2 still > reports it is up to date under Windows. No the PHP script has been updated, if it is not offering 5.1.3.2 there is a new issue in the version signature checks... Christian? Robinson?

Re: Fwd: LIbreOffice integration into accessible software project

@Jan, Regina H. and Fred W. were some of the last to poke at the math formula editor. Unfortunately, the StarMath syntax while comfortable has stagnated as W3C MathML evolved, and LaTex remained mainstream--we don't natively enter either and have to filter or extend to work with them. Regina

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] CrashDumps?

You can delete them safely. They are "mini" dumps that depending on available symbols can be attached to WinDbg and analyse the crash, or obtain a stack trace to review. They get generated by default per user into their %USERPROFILE%\AppData\Local\CrashDumps if this Windows registry key is

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOfficeDev 5.2.0 alpha1 test builds available

Pedro wrote > Hi Florian > > Long time no see ;) > Florian Reisinger wrote >> Have you installed the correct MS C++ redistributable? I do not which >> version is the baseline ATM... > I sincerely don't know. I never had to worry about that in any software > (including LibreOffice). > If the

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOfficeDev 5.2.0 alpha1 test builds available

@Cloph, * Not sure what to make of it, and do hate to report it, but seems the Windows builds for 5.2.0alpha1, both x86 and x64, are affected by packaging issue of tdf#99285 .

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Possibility of monitoring LibreOffice code with SonarQube

Sure, but do you mean in addition to the very functional Coverity Scan that the project already routinely uses? https://scan.coverity.com/projects/libreoffice Is that just a "belt + suspenders" idea, or is there really substantive advantage to flushing the code base through another quality

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] More information in About dialog

Pedro wrote > It couldn't be simple and consistent, could it? Actually, I had thought the (x64) was being applied to info "About" dialog for all builds =) But perusing the code showed it had only been done to distinguish the 64-bit Windows builds. [1] Hmm, maybe I need to spend more time in

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] More information in About dialog

See this MSDN note: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms724832%28v=vs.85%29.aspx -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/More-information-in-About-dialog-tp4177879p4177892.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] More information in About dialog

@Pedro, * Pedro wrote > The most frequent questions from people providing help in the User mailing > list and in the Bug tracker is: "What is your OS architecture?", "Are you > using the 32 bit version of LibreOffice ?" > > Isn't it possible that this information is included in the About dialog?

Re: Keyboard Shortcut

Yes, those are reserved here http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/vcl/source/app/svapp.cxx#99 -- fundamental to navigating keyboard only without mouse. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Re-Keyboard-Shortcut-tp4176943p4176975.html Sent from the Dev

Are vcl Global Shortcuts and localized accelerators diverging?

Hey "Devs", Please excuse me for poking in here out of turn... But, seems like there is some divergence and loss of function for Global short-cuts as defined in keycod.cxx and behavior of Accelerators assigned in

Re: Some problems in LibreOffice 5.1

jan iversen wrote >> On 11 Feb 2016, at 17:27, Carlos Molina Palma > cmolinap@ > wrote: >> ... >> 2. The Exit of LibreOffice command (Ctrl + Q) in File Menu doesn’t >> work. > This sound like real problem, can I please ask you to file 2 bug reports > using: >

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 5.1.0RC2 runs on MozTrap

sophi wrote > Hi Stuart, > > Thanks for running your tests on MozTrap. I've seen that you've created > a new run on MozTrap, what was the purpose of this run and why didn't > you use the one that was created? you wanted to test a special build? > In general, it's better to keep the tests in the

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Start Center, shortcuts, and so forth

This is wrapped up in Simon and Caolan's work on GTK, and the non-standard way the StartCenter accelerators & shortcuts are cobbled together. Two open issues: Bug 92516 - "x" accelerator and mouse click not exiting StartCenter in

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Building or bibisecting

Sophi, * Build on Linux but only when patching. Routinely bisect against my archive of daily pulls of Windows TBs. I don't run a bibisect git repo (though I probably should invest in setting up the Windows flavor since we seem short there). Stuart -- View this message in context:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [libreoffice-projects] minutes of ESC call ...

Pedro wrote > In case no one noticed the tinderbox is named Win-x86 but the builds are > Win_x64. Wrong upload? Looks like Thorsten just pointed the upload script to Win-x86@42 rather than Win-x86_64@42, simple correction. > How are the VS2015 builds different from those in tinderbox

Re: [libreoffice-users] Creating High Res Images in Draw or Impress

This is easily done from within Draw. 1. Open a new draw document 2. Use the page dialog to set orientation, and page size, also I prefer to remove margins--setting the page allows you to work with the whole drawing and pass it for export rendering. 3. Use the Insert -> Image, or the Drawing

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANNOUNCE] Branch libreoffice-5-0-2 and Tag libreoffice-5.0.2.1 created

No issue, I get a complete download and clean installation of both 32-bit and 64-bit builds of 5.0.2.1 build. Did you attempt to download too soon, only a partial installer had uploaded? LibreOffice_5.0.2.1_Win_x86.msi MD5 5a5b2bf4c026fdfa6344d8bf375563cf SHA-256

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Master builds

@Miguel Ángel, * Both Kendy and Cloph remain on vacation. Thier TBs of master will wait till they get back... just have to roll your own for the time being. Stuart -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Master-builds-tp4158636p4158637.html Sent from the QA

Re: Unable to use Writer as a publication tool

@madrosh, The major bug I have is applying a register-true to an entire document at a time. I use OL to put together a periodical, with columned text and many images (which are put in frames and anchored to specific pages). It is LO not OL, or better LibreOffice. Believe the best practice

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Issues with Display of Dialogs of 5.0-beta2

As Anreas is on Linux with KDE4, this is likely to be tdf#91301 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91301 which should be resolved with a 5.0.0beta4 build. Unclear of any relation to the other tdf#91882 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91882 issue which

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug/feature on Bugzilla?

Pedro, Pedro wrote I have never added myself to CC on any bug I commented in the past and yet I used to receive new comments/answers to my comments and changes to status. I think it makes sense that it works this way (i.e. no need to explicitly adding yourself to cc, if you comment you are

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Question regarding bug workflow

@Philippe, Your patch for tdf#34555 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34555 Make cropping handles for images (as in Draw/Impress) available for all LibreOffice applications is sitting in the Code review queue in Gerrit. https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/15541/ Depending

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Versions: 4.5-master vs. 5.0-master ?

Pedro wrote Since there are no 4.5 specific bugs (even if there were some regressions, there will be no final 4.5.0 version) it doesn't make any sense to keep 4.5 There is no 4.5 version. TDF is jumping from 4.4 to 5.0 so all bugs reported while 4.5 was under development now only

[Libreoffice-qa] help from Debian distro user on tdf#88117

Could someone running Debian 7 or 8, have a look at tdf#88117 - image truncated when exported to svg https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88117 . Can't repro any mix of Windows, Fedora, or RHEL -- so possibly Debian distro specific. Thanks. Stuart -- View this message in

Application Hangs

Using Mac, 4.4.1, on newest Yosemite, Text Document goes to 99 - 100% CPU (and stays above 95%) and shows one new 'Recent Hangs' every 5 seconds. It also shows 1000 context switches PER SECOND ---... During quiescence, stays above 90% except after non-use for 10 minutes. Has many context

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugs with Backtrace but Not Reproduced

@Joel, Think you need to share that query list for us to be able to run it--currently return invalid. Stuart -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Bugs-with-Backtrace-but-Not-Reproduced-tp4142359p4142406.html Sent from the QA mailing list

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.4.1 rc2 test builds available

@Cloph, * Needs more investigation, but looks like there may be continuing issues with signing of the OS X builds and Gatekeeper... Reopened -- https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84352 (Assigned to S. Bergmann) New -- https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89561

Re: [IMPORTANT] Google OpenId End-of-Life, Gerrit users need to take action

Ashod Nakashian-2 wrote So, unless Gerrit has decided not to, or is unable to, migrate to OpenID Connect by the deadline, migrating to OpenID Connect should be seamless and uneventful. Do we know whether or not Gerrit will have migrated by the deadline? (Granted, warning people to avoid a

Re: [IMPORTANT] Google OpenId End-of-Life, Gerrit users need to take action

Trying to accomplish the Link Another Identity process for my LO gerrit account. Username vsfoote Full Name V Stuart Foote Email Address vstuart.foote AT utsa.edu Registered Oct 2, 2014 2:18 PM Account ID 1000805 But the WebIdentities ?link an account page is a little thin

Re: [IMPORTANT] Google OpenId End-of-Life, Gerrit users need to take action

V Stuart Foote wrote Hmm, so looks like there is an issue with gerrit project's implementation of openid4java and StackExchanges OpenID (also using openid4java). s/(also using openid4java)/(using DotNetOpenAuth)/ -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org

Re: [IMPORTANT] Google OpenId End-of-Life, Gerrit users need to take action

Hmm, so looks like there is an issue with gerrit project's implementation of openid4java and StackExchanges OpenID (also using openid4java). Looks like StackExchange is serving OpenID AX attribute type/value pair exchanges to a namespace alias alias3 rather than the OpenID prototypical alias ax

Re: Request for late push to 4.4.1

@Tamás, Getting the first in to correct the MAB for 4.4.1 is probably enough. Thank you. As to even bringing the second down to 4.4, I'll have to do some bench marking comparing t a 4.4.2 nightly and a 4.5.0 master with the sw: avoid temporary object creation to build GraphicPrimitive2D patch.

Re: Request for late push to 4.4.1

@Miklos, *, Of course that is how it would work if all participants of the project were able and currently building from source. I don't. No excuses, I just don't. I should, and freely acknowledge that I need to. So, that said and out of the way--opportunity here to fix a nasty 4.4 MAB

  1   2   3   4   >