Re: [Libreoffice] [MacOS] Starting dev-install is hairy

2012-01-09 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 01/07/2012 09:07 AM, James C wrote: I've had trouble working out, from the code, what a user installation path is. There are two classes called Bootstrap, and my one reads the details from a map, which I assume is populated somewhere. utl::Bootstrap::locateUserInstallation from

Re: [Libreoffice] [MacOS] Starting dev-install is hairy

2012-01-02 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 12/22/2011 08:33 AM, James C wrote: - cd-ing into Contents/MacOS and running soffice, gives me apparently the version installed in /Applications Did you call it as plain soffice (instead of ./soffice) so it picked the one from PATH? Stephan

Re: [Libreoffice] [MacOS] Starting dev-install is hairy

2012-01-02 Thread James C
Hi Stephen, Probably not. There is currently no soffice in my path (as determined by which), and I don't think I've ever put anything in /Applications into the path, because the mechanism for starting those does not rely on it. What now strikes me as more likely is: - each process from each

Re: [Libreoffice] [MacOS] Starting dev-install is hairy

2012-01-02 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 01/03/2012 02:35 AM, James C wrote: What now strikes me as more likely is: - each process from each version of LibreOffice cooperates with other processes, so that only one LO process is running - (probably) the cooperation extends across versions - I don't recall whether I got a

Re: [Libreoffice] [MacOS] Starting dev-install is hairy

2011-12-22 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 20:33 +1300, James C wrote: I submitted a patch with git send-email. I presume that it is awaiting moderation. hmm, maybe not, probably worth extracting it with git format-patch and try sending it as a manual attachment. Even if it is in moderation, might be a while over