Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Possibly unused OTempFileService class

2011-07-18 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Caolan, On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 11:22 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: Where an extra utl string is to be prefixed to the stock component_getFactory entry point string to give an entry point of Which makes me wonder: does callcatcher cope with eliding foo_component_ prefixed methods we

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Possibly unused OTempFileService class

2011-07-18 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 11:22:45AM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 08:13 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote: It seems like OTempFileService, defined and implemented in libs-gui/unotools/source/ucbhelper is unused. There's no mention of this name elsewhere in the tree,

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Possibly unused OTempFileService class

2011-07-18 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 11:25 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: Hi Caolan, On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 11:22 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: Where an extra utl string is to be prefixed to the stock component_getFactory entry point string to give an entry point of Which makes me wonder: does

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Possibly unused OTempFileService class

2011-07-17 Thread Francois Tigeot
Hi, It seems like OTempFileService, defined and implemented in libs-gui/unotools/source/ucbhelper is unused. There's no mention of this name elsewhere in the tree, and LibreOffice builds and run fine without the files removed by the attached patch. One of the methods of this class is already in

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Possibly unused OTempFileService class

2011-07-17 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 08:13 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote: Hi, It seems like OTempFileService, defined and implemented in libs-gui/unotools/source/ucbhelper is unused. There's no mention of this name elsewhere in the tree, and LibreOffice builds and run fine without the files removed by