2011/10/6 Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com
Btw, v[0] (as well as v.front()) are only valid if !v.empty() -- but
(without checking it in detail right now) I guess the patch already takes
account of that, Maciej?
Yes it does. Mostly it is one function that takes also the size of data.
On 10/05/2011 10:11 PM, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 05.10.2011 22:02, Maciej Rumianowski wrote:
Dnia 2011-10-05, śro o godzinie 17:35 +0200, Lubos Lunak pisze:
On Wednesday 05 of October 2011, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
That would allow you to convert the pO-GetData() to something like
po-data(),
Hi Maciej,
On 2011-10-05 at 10:39 +0200, Maciej Rumianowski wrote:
There was a lot of WW8Bytes( SV_DECL_VARARR ) which was partly replaced
with ww::bytes. This set of patches totally migrates code to ww::bytes.
Very nice, thank you! :-)
Before pushing, I wonder - ww::bytes is
On Wednesday 05 of October 2011, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Hi Maciej,
On 2011-10-05 at 10:39 +0200, Maciej Rumianowski wrote:
There was a lot of WW8Bytes( SV_DECL_VARARR ) which was partly replaced
with ww::bytes. This set of patches totally migrates code to ww::bytes.
Very nice, thank you!
Dnia 2011-10-05, śro o godzinie 17:35 +0200, Lubos Lunak pisze:
On Wednesday 05 of October 2011, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Hi Maciej,
On 2011-10-05 at 10:39 +0200, Maciej Rumianowski wrote:
There was a lot of WW8Bytes( SV_DECL_VARARR ) which was partly replaced
with ww::bytes. This set of
On 05.10.2011 22:02, Maciej Rumianowski wrote:
Dnia 2011-10-05, śro o godzinie 17:35 +0200, Lubos Lunak pisze:
On Wednesday 05 of October 2011, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
That would allow you to convert the pO-GetData() to something like
po-data(), instead of (*pO)[0] (and similar) used on many
