[Libreoffice] question about cppcheck for libreoffice.boldandbusted.com

2010-11-27 Thread Julien Nabet
Hello, libreoffice.boldandbusted.com is a great idea, but what's the version cppcheck used for libreoffice.boldandbusted.com ? I ask this because cppcheck has sometimes false positives. For example, lately i had opened a tracker (#2235: false Resource leak) and today it's corrected. It could

Re: [Libreoffice] question about cppcheck for libreoffice.boldandbusted.com

2010-11-27 Thread someone
Hi Julien, It is the git version of cppchcek, which I checkout every few days via Portage. If you find false positives, you should let the cppcheck folks know, and they'll remove it or otherwise correct it (or tell you that it isn't a false positive ;) ). Which tracker are you referencing?

Re: [Libreoffice] question about cppcheck for libreoffice.boldandbusted.com

2010-11-27 Thread someone
I've added some code to my report generation scripts to insert the cppcheck git sha1 hash in the title of the report. I had to do a bit of shell trickery to get Gentoo's Portage to give me the hash of the installed cppcheck. It is in the middle of a report run now, so probably in 4-6 hours from

Re: [Libreoffice] question about cppcheck for libreoffice.boldandbusted.com

2010-11-27 Thread Julien Nabet
Hi Jesse I was talking about cppcheck bugtracker. There has been a fix for the tracker #2235, this one has been corrected yesterday. About false positives, i've created 3 trackers on cppcheck for the moment. 2 have been fixed : #2235 i talked about and #2210 which has been corrected by the