Hi all,
the problem is that we did not refresh search data for subsequent
searches, so the back references were always filled using the search
data of the first match. So, for RE ([0-9]{2})([0-9]{2}), replacement
$1.$2 and string 1200-1300, that would lead to the following sequence
of changes:
David Tardon píše v St 18. 04. 2012 v 10:02 +0200:
Hi all,
the problem is that we did not refresh search data for subsequent
searches, so the back references were always filled using the search
data of the first match. So, for RE ([0-9]{2})([0-9]{2}), replacement
$1.$2 and string 1200-1300,
