Hi Korrawit,
On Tuesday, 2011-09-06 21:52:46 +0700, Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote:
And please s/interger/integer ;)
Did that in the commit.
Also, it seems that you haven't check the range of ishift yet, whether
it is between -48 and 48 (from your description), or it isn't
necessary? I don't
Hi Olivier,
On Sunday, 2011-09-04 16:42:38 -0300, Olivier Hallot wrote:
If pushed, these new functions should be advertised in the Release notes.
What's the procedure for that?
Eike
--
PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypted mail preferred in all private communication.
Key ID: 0x293C05FD - 997A
Hi Regina,
On Wednesday, 2011-09-07 15:04:47 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
I see a lot of sal_uInt64 in the code. Is that supported for
Windows? As far as I know at least the MSVC Express has only 4Byte
long.
Umm.. now that you mention.. sal/inc/sal/types.h has
#if (_MSC_VER = 1000)
On 09/07/2011 04:37 PM, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Regina,
On Wednesday, 2011-09-07 15:04:47 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
I see a lot of sal_uInt64 in the code. Is that supported for
Windows? As far as I know at least the MSVC Express has only 4Byte
long.
Umm.. now that you mention..
Visual Studio has supported 64-bit int types (long long) since at least Visual
Studio 2005. See here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/s3f49ktz(v=vs.80).aspx
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/s3f49ktz%28v=vs.80%29.aspx
_MSC_VER evaluates to the version of the Visual Studio compiler.
Hi Eike,
Eike Rathke schrieb:
Hi Regina,
On Wednesday, 2011-09-07 15:04:47 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
I see a lot of sal_uInt64 in the code. Is that supported for
Windows? As far as I know at least the MSVC Express has only 4Byte
long.
Umm.. now that you mention.. sal/inc/sal/types.h
Subject: Re: [Libreoffice] Updated [Patch] new BITxxx functions for ODF 1.2
Hi Eike,
Eike Rathke schrieb:
Hi Regina,
On Wednesday, 2011-09-07 15:04:47 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
I see a lot of sal_uInt64 in the code. Is that supported for
Windows? As far as I know at least the MSVC Express has
Henschel; Korrawit Pruegsanusak; l...@pechlaner.at; Thorsten
Behrens; libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Libreoffice] Updated [Patch] new BITxxx functions for ODF 1.2
Visual Studio has supported 64-bit int types (long long) since at least Visual
Studio 2005. See here:
http
Hi Dennis,
Dennis E. Hamilton schrieb:
Um, of course, having 64 bit integers and having the bit-wise
functions work on them at full width is a bit different. Easy to
test though.
The Visual C++ Express Editions have had the same 64-bit (long long)
support as the full-up Visual Studio
Hi Eike
Well... no specific procedure, except to edit the wiki as I did (just to
not
forget it):
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/3.5#Calc
Olivier
Em 07-09-2011 09:51, Eike Rathke escreveu:
Hi Olivier,
On Sunday, 2011-09-04 16:42:38 -0300, Olivier Hallot wrote:
If pushed,
Visual Studio has supported 64-bit int types (long long) since at least
Visual Studio 2005.
Isn't __int64 (and unsigned __int64) the more traditional name for
the 64-bit integer types in MSVC? long long is newer in MSVC; in
other compilers it is of course the normal one.
--tml
Hi Olivier,
On Wednesday, 2011-09-07 15:59:29 -0300, Olivier Hallot wrote:
Well... no specific procedure, except to edit the wiki as I did
(just to not
forget it):
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/3.5#Calc
Thanks, just needed a pointer..
Eike
--
PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG
Hi Regina,
On Wednesday, 2011-09-07 16:58:04 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
so what evaluates _MSC_VER to in MSVCE?
How can I get that information?
In Env.Host.sh I get the lines:
SIZEOF_LONGLONG=8
I think if long long is supported to be 8 bytes we can safely assume
that the typedef of
Hi
Wonderful, great stuff - I have to apologize, the many whitespace
changes in the calc part of the patch are because of my substandard
mentoring - cleaned-up version of the first patch attached.
I was in the belief that we shall use spaces instead of tabs.
Corrected patches attached.
--
Hello all,
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 20:08, Niko Rönkkö niko.ron...@wippies.fi wrote:
Hi
Wonderful, great stuff - I have to apologize, the many whitespace
changes in the calc part of the patch are because of my substandard
mentoring - cleaned-up version of the first patch attached.
I was in
l...@pechlaner.at wrote:
I've made the new Functions BITAND, BITOR, BITXOR BITRSHIFT
and BITLSHIFT,, how declared in the ODF 1.2 specification. Can anyone
have a look on this Patches.
Wonderful, great stuff - I have to apologize, the many whitespace
changes in the calc part of the patch are
Hi
If pushed, these new functions should be advertised in the Release notes.
Olivier
Em 04-09-2011 09:45, Thorsten Behrens escreveu:
l...@pechlaner.at wrote:
I've made the new Functions BITAND, BITOR, BITXOR BITRSHIFT
and BITLSHIFT,, how declared in the ODF 1.2 specification. Can anyone
have
17 matches
Mail list logo
